The Death Penalty Doesn't Deter Crime

1083 words - 4 pages

I would characterize the public opinion on the death penalty as being an uninformed opinion. More people are in favor of the death penalty, now then back a few decades ago. People are not well informed on the statistics of the death penalty, like the number of prisoners, or the racial discrimination etc. I think that if more people were informed that some opinions would be changed.
It has been shown that men over women, whites over blacks, and Republicans over Democrats, conservatives over liberals are in favor of the death penalty (Bedau 90). These statistics have been found all through the whole period that the data was collected. It doesn't really seem as though people have formed exact opinions of why they support or oppose the death penalty, it’s more of just choosing a side and sticking by it. Most people’s attitudes toward capital punishment are basically emotional (95). Some people feel that killing is wrong so they oppose the death penalty. On the other hand people will feel that the only way justice will be served is to punish by death, so retribution seemed to be a big reason why they would support the death penalty, cause people more so someone would seek revenge for a loved one. People’s opinions are also based on the costs of imprisonment, or what crimes they think should be punishable by death.
I don't think everyone really wants people to die though. Polls have shown that when people were faced with the question of either the death penalty or life imprisonment without parole, that support for the death penalty dropped substantially (117). So it would seem that people really don't want an execution they just don't want the criminal to one day have a chance to roam free, or some might be scared that they will do it again if they have a chance to get out. But as long as the prisoner is contained and the people feel safe then the death penalty does not seem to be such a big necessity.
Some difficulties in trying to determine what the public’s view is on the death penalty are that the questions asked on polls are different. Also they way the questions are phrased are asked differently on different polls and also during different time periods. People aren't very well informed so instead of really forming an opinion there just choosing a side. These make it difficult to determine the view because there are so many flaws in the way it’s administered and the public is ignorant to many facts dealing with the death penalty.
I do not think that the Supreme Court should continue to rely on the public opinion as a way of determining “the evolving standards of decency.” My reason for this is because the people are like children and the Supreme Court our parents. People look up to the Supreme Court for guidance, answers, and justice. The courts should be the one to set the better example. We don't believe murder is right so the courts should enforce death as a punishment because it’s hypocritical. ...

Find Another Essay On The Death Penalty Doesn't Deter Crime

The Death Penalty Deters Crime and Saves Lives

1151 words - 5 pages “I don’t think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don’t think that’s right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people’s lives.” -- President George Bush Many who disagree with the death penalty believe it is immoral, discriminates, is very expensive, increases crime, and is only a way to carry out revenge. This, however, is not true. Capital punishment should be legal because it is

Death Penalty: Capital Punishment and Violent Crime

1590 words - 6 pages costs more than life? Again, this is seen as an implementation problem. It is the 14 to 17 years of appeals that cost money, not the lethal injection or the current of an electric chair. The death penalty doesn't deter violent crime? Some feel that if the death penalty were more swift in coming, and more likely, the danger would be more immediate to a would-be murderer, and would be more of a deterrent. Another answer could be that some

How might the death penalty prevent crime? Discuss in an essay

1323 words - 5 pages The Death Penalty: How does it affect crime?The death penalty is a major issue that brings up a lot of controversy in our society. The most important question concerning the death penalty is whether it should be abolished or not. Many people think that the death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights and that it also violates the right to life. Some say it is cruel, inhumane, and a degrading type of punishment. Other people are for it

Capital Punishment, specifically, the practice of State administered death as a penalty for any crime requires abolition

1108 words - 4 pages Capital PunishmentI will argue for the claim that Capital Punishment, specifically, the practice of State administered death as a penalty for any crime requires abolition.My argument centers on the simple violation of human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the U.N. in 1948, asserts "the right of every individual to protection from deprivation of life". It states that no person shall be subjected to cruel or

The death penalty

1996 words - 8 pages to Pojman there is no evidence that shows the death penalty is a nondeterrence of future crime. The best bet argument, which uses rational ? as its bases was set forth by Ernest Van den Haag. Haag argued that the death penalty deters future crime. If it does deter future crime then we save the lives of innocent people if the death penalty becomes legal. If we are wrong and it doesn't deter future crime then we sacrifice the lives of murders

The Death Penalty Worldwide

1656 words - 7 pages often the electric chair. The death penalty is a controversial topic in which some people believe that the death penalty serves as an example for criminals to think of the consequences of their actions. Other people believe that the death penalty does not in fact deter crime, but it is also an unconstitutional form of punishment. The death penalty has to be abolished because it is unethical, does not deter crime, and costs taxpayers money. The

The Death Penalty Debate

1768 words - 7 pages specifically can vary from state to state, but commonly include first-degree murder, murder with special circumstances, rape with additional bodily harm, and the federal crime of treason. (Facts) The goal of the death penalty then, is to deter these crimes from even taking place, to be so feared that offenders think twice about committing such horrible crimes. But does it? In the following paper, the above question will attempt to be answered by

The Death Penalty

628 words - 3 pages penalty only allows us to extend the pain. It allows us to continue to blame one another, to turn against one another, to learn to hate better' . Many people think that by executing some criminals, we will deter others. The cost to send a murderer to a death penalty is about 3 million dollars. The cost is dramatically lower to keep a criminal in for life imprisonment without the possibility for parole. The death penalty is just ' cruel and unusual

The Death Penalty

1799 words - 7 pages convicted criminal should lie in the hands of God. When someone is murdered in society, Americans rush to execute the criminal as soon as they can. Even though they may be executing an innocent person, Americans just want to see someone take the blame even though it might not always be the right person. Studies show that the death penalty does not actually deter crime in the United States like some would think it would do (6). Most think if a

The Death Penalty

607 words - 2 pages become a very strong and common word of the twenty-first century. In all crimes committed in the United States today, murder is the highest rated form of death for civilians. Every state has similar laws their state must abide by, and murder is plainly stated to be against the law. "We threaten punishments in order to deter crime"(Haag). Our judicial system uses the death penalty as persuasion to civilians not to commit crimes. So, our law

The Death Penalty - 1092 words

1092 words - 4 pages less both physically and mentally. Lastly, abolishment of the penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the Declaration of Independence. Is the death penalty going to make a difference in society? First of all, does the death penalty really deter crime? According to Gregory Ruff, a police lieutenant in Kansas

Similar Essays

Punishment For A Crime Has The Purpose Of Deterring Future Criminality. Death As A Penalty, Has Been Given To Serious Criminals Without Solid Evidence Of Its Effectiveness To Deter Serious Offenses

2156 words - 9 pages Lee PAGE 2 Sang Won LeeDr SiskDeath Penalty: Unconstitutional, but Legalized MurderPunishment for a crime has the purpose of deterring future criminality. Death as a penalty, has been given to serious criminals without solid evidence of its effectiveness to deter serious offenses. Actually, the crime rate is decreasing in Europe where the death penalty is not imposed, in the United States, on the other hand, where the death penalty is imposed

The Role Of The Death Penalty On Preventing Future Crime

8171 words - 33 pages Does the death penalty prevent future crime? We are scared. Surveys find that the fear of crime is high and perhaps rising. So the question of prevention is important. General deterrence is the idea that punishing an offender "deters" others from committing similar crimes. But does the threat of the death penalty actually discourage others from killing and thus make us safer? If so, does it do so significantly better than other forms of

There's No Evidence The Death Penalty Deters Crime

1748 words - 7 pages Capital punishment is very popular with the majority of Americans. Maybe, in part, because it feeds the inborn human need to feel revenge. The death penalty is also very popular politically and provides a way for politicians to show that they are fighting crime. Thirty-eight states have death penalty statutes and several other states are considering legislation to enact it. Yet, is capital punishment really effective and does it deter crime

The Death Penalty Is An Effective Weapon Against Crime

1319 words - 5 pages punishment deters crime.  Deterrence is the idea that the threat of punishment must be severe enough to counter the pleasures that the criminal would receive from committing the crime (Harries 11).  Even if a person gathers that capital punishment does in fact deter crime, they are left pondering if the death penalty is a more effective deterrent than life imprisonment.   The easiest way to consider capital punishment as a more