This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Demands Of National Security Vs. Individual Rights

716 words - 3 pages

No form of government can survive... when the life of the nation is at stake." Because I agree with Clinton Rossiter, I affirm the resolution that When the United States is engaged in military conflict, the demands of national security ought to supersede conflicting claims of individual rights.Definitions from Encarta World English DictionaryEngaged in Military Conflict means fighting open warfare.Demands of national security means protection against loss, attack, or harm to the citizens.Ought to supersede means that there is a duty or obligation to take the place or position of something.Conflicting means not able to be followed or acted on, because each requires different and incompatible ...view middle of the document...

" Even when man is in harmony with government, certain individual rights are limited. When in military conflict, however, justice and security are both compromised, and something must be done to protect them.Contention II: Government must provide for the safety of the society during war by further restricting rights. The highest obligation a government has is to provide the protection of its citizens, and certain rights that may be allowed in less vulnerable times may jeopardize national security during military conflict. Because new forces endanger the society, new measures must be taken to preserve societal order. Jean Jacques Rousseau affirms this. "Only the greatest dangers can outweigh that of changing the public order, and the sacred power of the laws should never be interfered with except when the safety of the country is at stake." Even certain constitutional rights may be temporarily superceded during these times. Political Science Professor Martin Shaffer explains: "To meet the challenge of a major emergency, the barriers...

Find Another Essay On The Demands Of National Security Vs. Individual Rights

National Security vs. the Right to Privacy

3061 words - 12 pages terrorist attacks on the United States, issues about privacy now focus on national security needs to protect against further violence at the hands of individuals among us” (23). This statement is a clear depiction of how the United States should continue working towards security. It is imperative that we continue to focus our efforts on stopping terrorism before it begins; however, it must be done in ways that are not encroaching on our personal

National Security vs. the Right to Privacy

790 words - 3 pages rethinking will concern law-how we will balance understandable demands for improved security with our right to privacy, our freedom to travel, our free speech, our policy of welcoming immigrants, and our commitment to a tolerant society. Once we learn how the terrorists learned to fly these Boeing planes, should we place new restrictions on pilot training? Access to flight simulators? First Amendment experts may rightly be concerned about such

Individual Rights vs. State's Rights

1000 words - 4 pages Lance ItoEssay #1February 12, 1997In the reviewing the case of Planck v. Indiana, many complicated issues arise. Included in those, individual rights conflicting with the public good are among the most difficult. According to Mr and Mrs. Planck's attorney, John Price, the Planck's religious beliefs prohibit them from accepting professional medicine practice, as they practice alternative medicine and home school their children. After a complaint

The Purpose of Individual Rights

1666 words - 7 pages segregation in the United States, and were the implied protection that the founding fathers put in the constitution to destroy any oppression attacking these rights of individuals. Individual rights were given to the people so that governmental control and leadership is not up to one person and up to who is worthy of the people. The people’s right to an opinion and the ability to express that opinion has been major in the development of our county today

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001: Need for National Security vs. Protection of Civil Liberties

1436 words - 6 pages In a post-September 11th America, it is not uncommon for the mentioning of the word “terrorist” to spark any number of emotions in its citizens. In response to activities such as the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, as well as the 2001 anthrax scares, Congress proposed the USA PATRIOT Act. Supporters of the Act cite the importance and immeasurable need for greater protection in terms of national security, which is the government’s

National Security vs. Civil Liberties

533 words - 2 pages The recent September 11th attacks have caused many Americans to wonder about the personal sacrifices to be made in order to keep the nation "safe and free." With mixed results, it has become a common practice throughout history to restrict personal freedoms in the name of national security. Many questions arise from this process: Where is the line drawn? If liberties are restricted do they ever truly return? If it is true that we are doomed

Indiviual Privacy vs National Security

1499 words - 6 pages intertwined as they both serve to fill the needs of a society by their purposes. It is not easy to maintain security without giving up some privacy. It just depends on what you feel is important. Each individual is different. While some feel that security should come at any cost, including privacy and liberty, there are others that feel there should be a balance. It is possible to juggle both, security and privacy. It takes effort and cooperation

Civil Liberties VS National Security

683 words - 3 pages someone's phone line, but eventually, they will want to put spy cameras in people's residences, and video record their private lives at home. This law can only lead to one bad thing after another. People's freedoms and privacies should not be sacrificed in the names of "safety" and "prevention."The Espionage Act of 1917 is a perfect example of when Americans' liberties were taken away in the name of national security. After the US entered WW1

Role of the National Cyberspace for American National Security

3032 words - 12 pages Role of the National Cyberspace for American National SecurityTerrified, panic, chaos and terrorism. These are a few words that could be used to describe the terrorist attacks on the United States during the day of September 11, 2001. These attacks scarred American history and everyone who remembers it forever. But imagine if the terrorist who organized these attacks also had attacked the United States cyberspace. What if terrorist used

Police Authority vs Individual Rights

1117 words - 4 pages freedoms and upholding the law, their job (Barkan, 2012). Police officers are allowed to think what they want or say how they feel, a right granted to them in the Bill of Rights. However, under the badge, police officers are required and expected to abide by the laws of the United States. Sometimes, the level of authority police hold in this situation can get them into trouble legally. This is what we call police misconduct (Barkan, 2012

The National Security Scam

1457 words - 6 pages paid to a company for service is not just so phone conversations can be occur between family and friends, but also for unauthorized surveillance of any individual. The National Security Agency violates section 2702 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act which protects customers from any communication provider attempting to share records with the government (Nielson 1). Despite the violation, the agency still operates as the unlawfulness is

Similar Essays

Individual Rights Vs. National Security Essay

878 words - 4 pages I negate the resolution, "Resolved: When the United States is engaged in military conflict, national security ought to supercede conflicting claims of individual rights. My value for the round is Human Dignity, or what can be defined as a respect for the individual and his or her rights and virtues. John Stuart Mill states that "Everyone who receive the protection of society owes a return for the benefit... but not to the point that it violates

Individual Privacy Versus National Security Essay

1871 words - 7 pages definition of the word clues to the term “freedom”. The aforementioned definition of security is very general. It does not stipulate the individual whose security is at issue or the types of values pliable to being secured. The security of people (“human security”) is understood to extend beyond national security, also comprising of economic welfare, the health of the environment, cultural identity, and political rights. Security began to take on a

An Analysis Of Cell Phone Technology, Security, And Individual Rights

1056 words - 4 pages An Analysis of Cell Phone Technology, Security, and Individual Rights In this technology driven era, I question what effect cell phones are having on our lives as American citizens? To investigate this, I read two articles. The first reading was “Mobile Phone Tracking Scrutinized” by Nikki Swartz originally published in the Information Management Journal for March/April 2006, and the second reading was “Reach out and Track Someone” by Terry

Why The American Government Has The Authority To Take Away Our Rights During The Time Of War And That National Security Supercedes The Rights Of The People

1394 words - 6 pages National SecurityWhen the United States is engaged in military conflict, do the demands of national security supercede conflicting claims of individual rights?" ...Only the greatest dangers can outweigh that of changing the public order, and the sacred power of the laws should never be interfered with except when the safety of the country is at stake". Because I agree with these words given by a great philosopher of the social contract, Jean