The Embryonic Stem Cell Research Controversy

1006 words - 4 pages

When James Thomson at the University of Wisconsin and John Gearhardt at John Hopkins University were able to culture human embryonic stem cells in a lab in 1998, they opened up an entire world of controversy now known as the stem cell debate. The importance of embryonic stem cells to modern science and medicine rests largely on the fact that they are pluripotent. This means that they have the ability to form into any cell necessary within the body; they can be encouraged to become skin cells, brain cells, etc. Organs could be grown in a lab and transplanted into patients, and these cells could be used to test new drugs, rather than a live human subject. This technology, according to scientists, could foster the ability to cure any disease, illness, or injury, but at what cost? Opponents of stem cell research believe that the practice of embryonic study and culture is immoral, while proponents suggest that this technology is necessary for the advancement of medical research.
In 2001, then President George W. Bush quickly sided with those believing the research to be immoral. During his primetime address, he advocated only to allow research on cell lines already in existence. Much of this side of the argument is based on the idea that human eggs are fertilized with sperm to create an embryo, and then destroyed to harvest the stem cells within the blastocyst. Many religious and pro-life groups – including, the Catholic Church, Christian Medical Association, Family Bioethics Counsel, etc. – believe that life begins at conception, and feel that this involves the destruction of human life. They consider it equal to abortion, which they also oppose.
A few years after this controversy emerged, in 2006, two bills were passed through the House and the Senate. The first, Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, H.R. 810, requested increased federal funding for embryonic stem cell research and the ability to utilize donated cells from in vitro fertilization clinics. The second, S.3504, prohibited the creation of human embryos specifically for research purposes. The president vetoed H.R. 810 and passed S.3504. In his stem cell veto and executive order announcement, he states, “destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical – and it is not the only option before us” (par. 11). With the backing of President Bush, embryonic stem cell research was halted, while federal funding was allotted to adult stem cell research and the search for more ethical methods of advancement.
With these options, opponents of embryonic research suggest that there are ways to employ stem cells without harming a living being or creating life only to destroy it. They see the positives of this research and hope only to be patient with its study in order to come to solutions or scientific discovery by ethical means.
It wasn’t, however, until the election of now President...

Find Another Essay On The Embryonic Stem Cell Research Controversy

Embryonic stem cell research Essay

854 words - 4 pages Imagine standing on a desolate Island, reclusive and isolated from all of mankind. The only creatures that stand in your way towards liberation to the shores of humanity are innocent little () . In order to reach the shores of freedom, you must kill these poor critters. Would you do it? Suggestive of this metaphor (commences) a very similar issue: Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Like the scenario of the island stampeded by the liitle critters

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essay

1979 words - 8 pages slaughtering potential human beings, while other people backed through science and research feel as though these are not active life-forms until they reach a certain stage. In this essay, I will explain what stem cells and embryonic stem cells are and how they are important to mankind. I will explain the controversy behind embryonic stem cell research and how many Americans feels as though this is not a necessary way of getting stem cells. Although

Embryonic Stem Cell Research

2539 words - 10 pages acquire changeable degrees of conceptual awareness like adults and children; the degree of awareness is not as vital as the reality of its ownership. For example, children have certain basic rights, but not others. As they grow, and as their conceptual awareness and their power of reason grow, they gain more rights. The same is true when an adult is diagnosed with a mental illness such as Alzheimer’s (Stephens). “Embryonic stem cell research

Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1419 words - 6 pages considerable breakthrough in regenerative medicine, it raises serious ethical controversy. A specific type of stem cell used in regenerative research is an embryonic stem (ES) cell; harvested through the destruction of human embryos. (Hurlbut, 2006) This poses a significant ethical dilemma, as ES cells are sourced from pre-implantation embryos leftover from In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF). The destruction of embryos is seen by many as an abuse of human

Embryonic Stem Cell Research

698 words - 3 pages encourage further destruction of human embryos that have at least the potential for life”. Now, according to an article in U.S Liberal Politics titled: Pros& Cons of Embryonic Stem Cell Research“ President Obama have lifted the federal funding ban for embryonic stem cell research”. But still, laws are very clear, and even if using embryonic cells is allowed, credible sources such as Wikipedia declare that ”the creation of a human embryo

Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1153 words - 5 pages Embryonic Stem Cell ResearchA new advance in technology that seems to make itself the topic of talk show round tables and dinner tables is embryonic stem cell research. With supporters and detractors on both sides of the issue, it is clear that this controversial procedure will continue to encourage debates whether it be on television, in newspapers, or just between humans in general. The ingenuity of this scientific advancement shows promise in

The Stem Cell Research Controversy

1813 words - 7 pages . Knowing this, prominent researchers are already leaving for Britain declaring their independence from restrictive regulations in the United States (Berger 2). One embryonic stem cell research laboratory (not government funded) has created human embryos exclusively for research purposes ("Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine" 2). Would it not be better if the government instead of doing things freely regulated that research? The genetic

The Debate Concerning Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1515 words - 6 pages One of the most heated political battles in the United States in recent years has been over the morality of embryonic stem cell research. The embryonic stem cell debate has polarized the country into those who argue that such research holds promises of ending a great deal of human suffering and others who condemn such research as involving the abortion of a potential human life. If any answer to the ethical debate surrounding this particular

Stem Cell Research Controversy

891 words - 4 pages The controversy over stem cell research’s use in the medical field is almost two decades old. So why the sudden intense return of fierce political debates over an old issue? It’s because President Obama recently revoked the ban on stem cell research, as he believes it holds the potential to revolutionize the medical industry in the years to come. As USA Today quoted him saying in March, after he stopped restricting federal funding for stem cell

Support Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1414 words - 6 pages specific and tends to revert back to where it originated. Scientists use adult stem cells for ongoing research to develop new treatments, and no controversy surrounds this research. The process of in vitro fertilization is very complex, but to better understand the debate of embryonic stem cell research, one must be familiar with the stage at which the embryo must be implanted, frozen, or discarded. Embryonic stem cells, as their name suggests

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1311 words - 5 pages most of the cells specializing and becoming all the tissues that form the developing foetus. Some of these cells retain the ability to become any type of cell located in the body. They act as a kind of reservoir, one that provides new cells to replace those that are damaged or lost. At the foetal stage of development, they are known as ‘Embryonic Stem Cells.’ These cells are at the heart of the controversy surrounding stem cell research because a

Similar Essays

The Controversy Over Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1161 words - 5 pages There is an ever growing controversy surrounding stem cell research. First off, stem cells, are the earliest of cells (basically the first cells that are created to form the human body) that give rise to other types of cells, and have the potential to turn into many different types of tissue. They are similar to cells called Totipotent cells, which are considered the master cells of the body, because they contain genetic information needed to

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essay 972 Words

972 words - 4 pages The use of embryonic stem cells in regard to research involving the creation, usage, and destruction of human embryos has been the center of ethical debate. Embryonic stem cell research offers a remarkable way to treat various diseases where therapeutic interventions have failed to treat effectively. These cells have the ability to self-renew, and are also pluripotent, which means they have potential to differentiate into a more specialized

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essay 1932 Words

1932 words - 8 pages Human embryonic stem cell research has been seen as unethical and immoral due to the potential of the cell developing into a person. Stem cell research itself has proven the ways in which the medical field can advance and benefit from experimentation. The controversy lies within the "embryonic" aspect. Cells are the smallest units of living matter and are capable of independent functioning. Stem cells can be considered precursor cells (Melloni

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essay 1513 Words

1513 words - 6 pages inevitably raises moral questions within us, removing us from the simplistic routine of daily life and placing us in the uncomfortable realm of controversy. Such is the case with embryonic stem cell research. Four sources where examined to give further understanding to the issue of embryonic stem cell research and the morality of the issue. After researching the sources I feel that embryonic stem cell research is moral because science has the potential