The Enlightenment: Hobbes Versus Locke Essay

920 words - 4 pages

The Enlightenment was an 18th century intellectual movement concentrated in France that had lasting repercussions throughout Europe and America. Questioning traditional doctrines and values marked the Enlightenment; there was a notable tendency towards individualism and emphasis on the ideas of human progress. Celebrated philosophes such as Francois-Marie Arouet also known as Voltaire (1694-1778) and the enigmatic Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) marked some of the intellectual catalysts for the new ideas and approaches to old customs that wore down institutionalized traditions. The philosophes crafted the vocabulary for the French and American Revolutions, not by being advocates of violent revolution, but by encouraging free use of reason and the universality of humanity and natural rights. These same principles evoked a rallying cry throughout France and later America for systematic governmental changes; these cries manifested themselves in the form of the American and French Revolutions. The American Constitution and the Bill of Rights are both products of the Enlightenment and ideas of the philosophes, in particular John Locke.The political theorist and elitist, John Locke (1632-1704) wrote the "Second Treatise on Government", in this work he hypothesized that man is naturally a social animal, characterized by reason and tolerance. He also maintained that in man's "State of Nature" men were equal and "free to pursue life, health, liberty and possessions". For this reason he believed that a mythical contract existed to provide common defense and necessities for the people based on mutual consent. Locke being an optimist thought that it is man's human nature to be naturally good and humane towards his fellow man, for this reason he felt that government was organized in order to protect the inalienable rights of man: life, liberty and property. Locke had knowledge of Natural Law; the law asserts that there is some kind of non-conventional relation between law and morality. Natural law is comprised of precepts that govern the behavior of beings possessing reason and free will. As the Natural Law states and Locke believed: every man has an innate ability to reason. Locke believed that reality consisted of both material and spiritual substances and that humans are born without any innate ideas. Locke affirmed that humans become furnished with ideas through experience.In Locke's "Second Treatise on Government" he concluded that there was a social contract that people in a society entered into freely and voluntarily. Locke felt that majority should rule and that political power should be shared and not in the hands of the few. Locke linked economic liberty and private property with political freedom and felt strongly that no government should have the authority to take the property of any man. Locke also stressed common consent...

Find Another Essay On The Enlightenment: Hobbes versus Locke

Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke: Who is the true liberal?

1685 words - 7 pages Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are often referred to as the premier liberal philosophers, a label which is actually misleading. The political philosophies of Hobbes and Locke are only similar in their methodology, not in their conclusions or in the form of government they advocate. In fact, the ideologies of Hobbes and Locke are so dissimilar they should not even be counted in the same category. Hobbes and Locke both begin with a theoretical

Locke, Hobbes and the Good Life: The Proper Role and extent of Government

1792 words - 7 pages The political philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke revolve around the proper role and extent of government. Their two philosophies have extensive similarities but in the end are wholly different when it comes to the quality of life they provide for their subjects. The differences lie in whether they provide mere life or the good life for their subjects. Aristotle laid out the basic ideas of mere life versus the good life when he stated

differences between the social contract theory of john locke and thomas hobbes

2347 words - 9 pages a common enemy. He advocated for an established order. Hence, Individualism, materialism, utilitarianism and absolutions are inter-woven in the theory of Hobbes. Analysis of the theory of Social Contract by John Locke  John Locke theory of Social Contract is different than that of Hobbes. According to him, man lived in the State of Nature, but his concept of the State of Nature is different as contemplated by Hobbesian theory. Lockeǯ

Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx

772 words - 3 pages In the idea of human nature; origin of state, the nature of government, the rights of regulation can be drawn as the reflection of insightful philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx. By understanding this within the context of human nature, we can see their ideas play to how they perceive a modern philosophy. Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto illustrates the desire to build "a society without economic classes". John Locke's

It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in regards to social contract, the state of nature and each of their ideal governments.

1843 words - 7 pages HOBBES, LOCKE AND ROUSSEAUTHE STATE OF NATUREHobbes invites us to take place in a thought experiment where equals and nonequals are placed together in a state of nature without the existence of a state power placed over them. Hobbes believes that the people will soon lapse into a state of war where each person is threatened with violent attack. He says the conflict is caused by three basic factors, which are, competition, diffidence and glory

In this discussion we will look at the meaning and nature of the social contract as seen from the point of view of political theorists, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.

2024 words - 8 pages free-for-all that Hobbes described. People left the state of nature, according to Locke, not out of fear of violent death, but as a matter of convenience and in order to protect their property. They did not give all of their rights to an absolute authoritarian government. Instead, they formed two distinctively separate agreements: the contract of society and the contract of the majority of society and government or "trustee relationship." For Locke

Hobbes Versus Rawles On The Fool

1991 words - 8 pages I Both Thomas Hobbes and John Rawls propose an idea of a social contract, for society. Hobbes' account gives us the Leviathan, and Rawls gives us his Theory of Justice. For Rawls a social contract is hypothetical, in other words people would agree to it if they were to choose it.1 He creates a thought experiment, to show what people would choose if they were to decide on a social contract. This exists in what he calls the "original

The Age of the Enlightment Analysis

1278 words - 5 pages Catholic Church helped keep these beliefs alive through all the doubt and skepticism that was brought about by the Enlightenment. Last of all the debates to be discussed is the debate upon the nature and fundamental rights of humanity. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are prime examples of the two contrasting beliefs in this particular area. To begin, John Locke claimed that, “men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for

John Locke vs Thomas Hobbes

688 words - 3 pages Locke versus Hobbes Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists, and both natural law theorists, but there the resemblance ends. All other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal. Hobbes assumed otherwise, thus his conclusions are strikingly different from those of other natural law theorists. What would life and human relations be like in the absence of government? Thomas Hobbes was the first to

European Enlightenment

626 words - 3 pages . Edward Jenner built a vaccine against smallpox, a deadly disease. These sort of scientific successes prompted European thinkers to use reason to find laws to govern the physical world, which they called natural laws. Natural laws are laws that govern human nature. Two prominent “thinkers” during the enlightemnet were Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Thomas Hobbes wrote a book about his ideas called the Leviathan. In his book he argued that people

The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were witness to several intellectual revolutions in Europe.

1451 words - 6 pages . Where Hobbes' fears led to absolutism, Locke's led to a more accountable system of governance.Rousseau had much less in common with Locke and Hobbes than they did with each other. Where the former two both believed self-interest was the driving force behind the creation of societies, Rousseau felt it was the traditional bond of the family. Furthermore, he rejected the presumption that the Enlightenment had brought about a better society than

Similar Essays

John Locke Versus Thomas Hobbes Essay

1303 words - 5 pages subject areas such as the nature of man in society, the relationship between a society and its government, and the affect that both philosophers’ novels had on the government, it can be concluded that both Hobbes and Locke’s philosophies created prominent change in the methods of government. Both Locke and Hobbes experienced different events that prompted them to write their novels. Hobbes witnessed the conflict and violence of the English

The Ideas Of Hobbes Vs Locke

964 words - 4 pages Hobbes Vs. LockeNick CappyThomas Hobbes and John Locke were English philosophers who attended Oxford University. Hobbes was born in Westport, England and Locke was born in Wrington. These two philosophers became famous because of their ideas about politics and the understanding of human nature. Thomas Hobbes had a very negative view on human nature. He describes human nature as being constantly at war with one another. According to Hobbes

Hobbes And Locke: The Power Debate

1393 words - 6 pages Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were seventeenth century political philosophers whose different beliefs stemmed from the different contexts in which each man lived. Hobbes, an aristocrat who lived through the English civil war, had to flee England, watch his monarch’s execution, and observes the violence of human nature at its very worst. Given this experience, his central concern was the need for absolute power to maintain peace and prevent

The Natural Ways Of Locke, Hobbes, And Rousseau

1382 words - 6 pages philosophers mainly concern themselves with the concept of the social contract. Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke begin with the conception of the individual, because in the natural state, they all believe that man is an independent character. Each of the philosophers used their revolutionary concepts to challenge power, yet their arguments differ dramatically. Through their texts, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau portray Enlightenment ideals of their time period