The Ethics Of Medical Animal Testing

1896 words - 8 pages

In all matters, including medicine, the well-being of the human race comes before any other consideration. This is the justification for the use of nonhuman animal testing in medicine. Of course this argument brings issues into play that are both ethical and professional and need exploring before a definitive answer can be given.

The Rights of “Lesser Life Forms”

Animals have rights. This is a statement that very few people will disagree with. Animal cruelty as an end unto itself (i.e. for entertainment) is just wrong. Short of being a sociopath I really can’t imagine anyone saying or thinking otherwise. The real ethical question comes when humanity can benefit from a “cruelty” committed against an animal.

As far as life on this planet goes, we appear to be at the pinnacle of creation. Though we have only been here for less than the blinking of an eye, as far as our small planet is concerned, we have achieved heights unparalleled by any species to grace the world before us. Because of this we have looked at the rest of existence as lesser than us and therefore present for our use.

A Respect for All Life

This view of superiority has begun to diminish only very lately. The first reason for this elevated respect for nonhuman animals comes from the same source as our concern for our fellow human beings: compassion. As a species humans have, for whatever reason, developed the ability to conceptualize ourselves in the place of other things we observe. While this ability is strongest when dealing with other humans, it is even possible to do this with humans. This is of course followed by hard reasoning as to why nonhuman animals do have rights.

Peter Singer, a professor in bioethics, is believed by some to have begun the modern animal rights movements with his writings. In his book Animal Rights and Human Obligations Singer illustrated animal rights as the next logical step to follow those against racism and sexism. He describes our current state as a speciesism where we have decided that we are superior to animals for no better reason than any discrimination within our own race has ever had.

Ideologies such as these lead to the formation of animal rights organizations. Probably the most well known animal rights group is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). This organization is against everything from animal testing, to meat eating, and even pet owning. On the Frequently Asked Questions section of their website they even speak in support of organizations such as the Animal Liberation Front, an organization that resorts to destruction of property and vandalism in service to the cause.

Overall there are an abundant number of sights on the internet of organizations against animal testing. All of them operate on the basic premises that we shouldn’t cause harm to animals and even use the argument that animal testing doesn’t work. These last arguments will be addressed later.

Why Animal Testing is done


Find Another Essay On The Ethics of Medical Animal Testing

The Controversy of Animal Testing Essay

1302 words - 5 pages many animals are forced to live under. Animal testing is defined as the use of non-human animals in research and development projects ( All kinds of animals such as rabbits, dogs, mice, and guinea pigs are used to test the safety of food additives, industrial chemicals, cosmetics, drugs, household products and much more. Universities, pharmaceutical companies, and medical schools are examples of

The Issues of Animal Testing? Essay

1128 words - 5 pages every living organism has. Unfortunately, the killing of animals follows as a result of the achievement of medical science. However, is was animal testing that helped create key cures for major diseases like cancer, heart disease, tropical disease, kidney disease, and asthma. Nevertheless, some may say that loving animals or other organisms also is a natural human instinct. But, what if in the 1950s some parents who are animal lovers find out that

The Harm of Animal Testing

1412 words - 6 pages Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many

The Cruelty of Animal Testing

1694 words - 7 pages people against animal testing. The AWA sets minimum housing standards and also requires regular inspections by veterinarians. The animals not protected by the Animal Welfare Act are fish, birds, rats, and other cold blooded animals, which make up 95% of the animals being tested on; and because these animals aren’t protected scientists are able to mistreat and abuse these species. According to the Humane Society International, “animals used in

The Ethics of Genetic Testing

3438 words - 14 pages The Ethics of Genetic Testing The Goal of the Human Genome Project is to obtain genetic mapping information and to determine the complete sequence of all human DNA by the year of 2005. The project started in 1990 and 180 million dollars are being spent on it annually. This adds up to a total of over 2 billion dollars for the 15 year budget. Of this 2 billion dollars budgeted, 5% is spent annually on the ethical, legal and social issues

Animal testing: Inevitability of animal testing

1161 words - 5 pages arousesstudent’s interest in biology. Also by testing animal, students are able to get detailed, practical knowledge. Finally, measures that guarantee animal rights are conducted.Animal testing is not same as animal abuse.3’R’s, the general principles of ethics about animal testing, were established.In 1959, William Russell and Rex Burch proposed 3Rs guidelines for more humaneanimal testing. Replacement, Reduction and refinement are 3Rs. Replacement means

The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing

1470 words - 6 pages superior race (Blazina, Boyra & Shen-Miller, 2007). This is a belief known as anthropocentrism. This belief is still around today and is the main cause of the debate as to whether animal ethics are important when it comes to animal research. Animals are used mainly for the testing of drugs, vaccines, and other medical reasons to determine the safety of the product (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2010). Scientists who use animals want to see

Case Study: The Benefits of Animal Testing

1757 words - 7 pages consumers.  Though some may disagree, animal testing is both beneficial and practical to the well being of both humans and animals. Animal testing saves countless lives and plays a practical role in medical advances. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. In 2009, heart disease claimed the lives of some 616,067 people (“FastStats”). However, due to the continuous

The Evils of Cosmetic Animal Testing

2719 words - 11 pages developed as long ago as the 1920s to evaluate the toxicity of consumer products and their ingredients. Rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and other animals are forced to swallow or inhale massive quantities of a test substance or endure the pain of a chemical eating away at their sensitive eyes and skin––even though the results of animal tests are often unreliable or not applicable to humans. (1) Cosmetic testing isn’t the only type of animal testing

Abolishment of Animal Testing

1033 words - 4 pages Animal Testing Should Be AbolishedAnimal testing imposes a great deal of cruelty on innocent creatures. Testing involves the use of cosmetics, medicines, and household products on animals. The tests are all unnecessary because animals react to substances much differently than humans. All of the tests take long amounts of time to complete, and in the end they are pointless due to the fact that they only show needless results. Today's technology

Abolishment of Animal Testing

1819 words - 7 pages and mistreated so badly that they die before they are even experimented on. Animal testing is a cruel procedure and should be made illegal. However, animal testing is very important to understanding the human body. Over the years, we have vivisection to thank for many of our medical advances we have reached this far. Vivisection is the practice of performing the testing procedures that are done on the live test animals. Some say that it is

Similar Essays

Animal Testing Ethics Essay

1528 words - 6 pages that experiment on animals use is the utilitarian ethical theory. The utilitarian ethical theory is founded on the ability to predict the consequences of an action. To a utilitarian, the choice that yields the greatest benefit to the most people is the choice that is ethically correct. Since scientists believe that animal testing can benefit humans they feel good about conducting their experiments. One benefit of this ethical theory is that the

Animal Testing In Medical Research Essay

1635 words - 7 pages ) Even if the uses of animal testing in medical research produce goods for the society in terms of beneficial treatments, the pain experienced by the animals can be far more than the goods produced. If we evaluate this practice through Bentham’s perception, the action of causing pain and distress to animals during the course of medical research is morally wrong because this process causes no pleasure and great pain and distress to the animals that

Animal Testing Is Vital To Medical Advances

3050 words - 12 pages Research is responsible for virtually all the medical breakthroughs there have been- there are medicines and vaccines and cures and treatments and more life saving benefits being developed today- but an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Virtually almost everyone alive has benefited from the medical advances made feasible through animal testing. According to my aunt Blanca, who is a

The Necessity Of Animal Testing Essay

1299 words - 5 pages Way to the Complete Elimination of Animals from the Laboratory." The Scientist (Nov.-Dec. 2011). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. "Update: Animal Testing." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 31 Mar. 2006. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. . "Using Animals for Medical Testing Is Unethical and Unnecessary." The Ethics of Medical Testing. Ed. Tamara Thompson. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "Animal Experiments: Overview." People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals [PETA]. 2011. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.