This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Evolution Of Criminal Law: From The Common Law To Modern Statutes And The Model Penal Code

4557 words - 18 pages

IntroductionThe history of Criminal Law in the United States does not begin as one might imagine with the creating of our Constitution, nor even with the Declaration of Independence that predated it by more than a decade. Nor indeed does that history begin in the colonial period. Our criminal law finds its genesis in a much earlier period, in the times of Moses and of Hammurabi. The historic path towards our current Jurisprudence then diverges, proceeding from these legal luminaries to the Roman Republic and to the Gauls, Franks and Germanic people who populated the European Continent during the early Middle Ages. Law as it is commonly perceived came to the English Isles with the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Danes, and lastly with the Norman conquest of William in 1066. In a decisive moment in English Law, King John signed the Magna Carta at Runnymeade in 1215. But what purpose did these new laws and new influences on existing laws serve? What is the Common Law of England that came to be so vital to early American Jurisprudence? Does the common trend towards a Model Penal Code of criminal law stand in contradistinction to the earlier legal forebears, or are these merely codification and evolution of their predecessors?In arguably one of the most influential works to effect American legal thought, Oliver Wendell Holmes (1881) defined the purpose of criminal law in his The Common Law: "For the most part, the purpose of the criminal law is only to induce external conformity to the rule. All law is directed to conditions of things manifest to the senses. And whether it brings those conditions to pass immediately by the use of force, as when it protects a house from a mob by soldiers, or appropriates private property to public use, or hangs a man in pursuance of a judicial sentence, or whether them about immediately through men's fears, its object is equally an external result." And law has as much to do with punishing the wrongdoer as with laying out what those governed should seek to avoid doing. As Sir James Stephen concisely stated in his History of the Criminal Law of England (1883), "The criminal law stands to the passion of revenge in much the same relation as marriage to the sexual appetite."This paper will discuss the historical underpinnings of our current system of criminal law, and the ways in which the English Common Law were co-opted nearly wholesale for use by the colonies following their emancipation from their far-away sovereigns. From there I will discuss our transformation from common law (or lex non scripta, unwritten law) to a more statutory basis (or lex scripta). Finally, I will discuss what lies ahead as more and more states adopt the Model Penal Codes presented by the American Law Institute.History of Criminal LawThe law embodies the story of a nation's development through many centuries, and it cannot be dealt with as if it contained only the axioms and corollaries of a book of mathematics. In order to know what it is, we must...

Find Another Essay On The Evolution of Criminal Law: From the Common Law to Modern Statutes and the Model Penal Code

History of Criminal Law from the Roman Justice

4665 words - 19 pages with the dogma of the completude), it was transferred to understand that the "Code" did not have gaps, therefore the judge fit the function to base its decisions on the analogy and the orienting general principles of the code. The law started to be the only unalterable e source of the Right, fitting to the judge, the sight of the problem, to find the norm in the "Code", renegando it tradition of the Common law of the "Ancien Regimen" that placed

Criminal Law, Criminal Careers, and the Criminal Justice System

2544 words - 10 pages LawCriminal law seeks to protect the public from harm by inflicting punishment upon those who have already done harm and by threatening with punishment those who are tempted to do harm. Most people accept that there are consequences for criminal conduct. The consequences are generally unpleasant and take away from the law breaker either his liberty or his property.One purpose of criminal law is to respond to harmful acts committed by individuals. However

The Difference Between Civil Law and Criminal Law

979 words - 4 pages One way of looking at criminal law is that it is dealing with something of public awareness. For instance, the public has awareness in seeing that people are protected from being robbed or assaulted. These are legal problems that fall into the criminal law. Criminal law involves punishing and rehabilitating offenders, and protecting the public. Since the public has an interest in having criminal law, we give the

Criminal Law and The War on Drugs

1778 words - 7 pages   "Our long armed and hairy ancestors had no idea of redress beyond vengeance, or of justice beyond mere individual reprisal."3   To determine what constitutes criminal law, is, as one learned judge has opined, "a work of art, it is something that may be easier to recognize than define ..."4 I shall venture to say, that, when a person commits a crime that person commits a breach of faith with the community in which that person lives. In

The Consensus Theory of Criminal Law

870 words - 3 pages The consensus theory of criminal law contents that society finds its own way and it is product of social needs and values, it also serves the interest of society at large. Rules are for the community to control themselves and to put order. If a crime is committed it is punished by what the society considers appropriate. The significance of that crime has to be evaluated by the same society as well as the punishment

Criminal Law in the News

917 words - 4 pages Criminal Law in the NewsI chose to use an article that I received from www.nytimes.com/2006/08/07/us/07shoot.html. This article is about how there are 15 states that have enacted laws that expands the right of self defense back in 2006.According to the Liptak, the supporters of this law call them "stand your ground" laws and the opponents call them "shoot first" laws. There have been many so called self defense shootings that were not self

Comparison of characteristics and perceptions of the Qld Criminal Justice System, Aboriginal Customary Law and Islamic Criminal Law according to crime and punishment procedures

2946 words - 12 pages questionnaire research method has been performed. The performed sampled 30 peoples perceptions on the differences between the stated model criminal justice systems. Out of the 30 people 8 are experts in Islamic law, 8 experts in Queensland criminal justice system and 8 experts in Customary Law. The remaining 6 from the general Australian public. One third are experts in their field. This questionnaire has been devised to get the best out of my

Comparison of common law and equity law

2888 words - 12 pages , and "common law" decisions issued by courts (or quasi-judicial tribunals within agencies). This first connotation can be further differentiated, into (a) laws that arise purely from the common law without express statutory authority, for example, most of the criminal law, contract law, and procedural law before the 20th century, and (b) decisions that discuss and decide the fine boundaries and distinctions in statutes and regulations. See

The Code of Hammurabi vs. the Hebrew Law

571 words - 2 pages the most.There are so many things the code of Hammurabi and the Hebrew's code of law have in common that it is hard to pick out the differences between the two. Some of the similarities include the "eye for eye" principles, the different punishments among the classes, and the emphasis on a sort of justice. Both of the systems of law are based somewhat on an "eye for eye" principle although the code of Hammurabi is much closer to it. An example

The law of equity came about to remedy the defects of the common law system. Discuss.(includes how equity came about and its remedies. Bibliography included.)

1081 words - 4 pages By the end of the 13th century, the central authority had established its precedence at least partly through the establishment of the common law. The Courts of Exchequer was a court originally dealing with disputes involving revenue, taxation and revenue laws. The Court of Common Pleas was where pleas between subject and subject were brought. And the King's Bench heard actions to which the King was a party.The common law however, had a number of

The relationship between human rights and common law

2505 words - 10 pages law, and holds much truth given the limited historical existence and operation of international human rights.Much of the common laws recognition of human rights in Australia has been inherited from English common law, with the most notable developments being the Magna Carta 1215, and the Bill of Rights 1688, which bore resemblance to the modern human rights provisions .The traditional position of the courts in relation to the use of

Similar Essays

The Development Of Common Law And Equity

3149 words - 13 pages unhappy when they couldn't receive justice in the Common Law courts, therefore they would petition the King asking him for a solution. The king was known as the foundation of justice because all law originally came from him. The king then referred petitions to the Lord Chancellor. He was a priest and lawyer who was known as the keeper of the kings conscience. The cases that were referred to him were decided on the basis of

The Common Law Of Employment Essay

607 words - 3 pages The Canadian employment law system consists of three regimes: common law, employment regulation, and collective bargaining agreement (CBA). From these regimes, the common law of employment is one that was created by Judges over centuries in order to regulate the employer-employee relationship. Judges, from lower level to upper level courts have used employment contracts and torts, two tools available to them under the common law system to aid in

Occupiers' Liability From The Common Law

2405 words - 10 pages between invitee and licensee and the Act would “in place of the common law, to regulate the duty the duty the duty which an occupier of a premises owes to visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises…” . Therefore its evident that the common law position in England with regards to occupiers’ liability was to a large extent confined to history with this act. However the Act did not apply to trespassers which were governed by

Learning Criminal Law And English Common Law

1034 words - 5 pages basis of the common law. These reports are the fundamental material about the history of critical institutions and processes of the English common law, and it is developed from ancient roots and early history and features. On the constitution on the tenth amendment, and part of the Bill of Rights, provides that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States