The Factors Influencing The Way Each Of The Members Of The Jury Perceived The Murder In Twelve Angry Men

1214 words - 5 pages

The Factors Influencing the Way Each of the Members of the Jury Perceived the Murder in Twelve Angry Men

Each of the members of the jury perceived the murder according to
their own beliefs, values and social status. As the story unfolds,
reveals the jurors' complex personalities, preconceptions, backgrounds
and interactions. The most important factors that influence perception
is personality, learning and motivation.

The juror that strongly believes that the defendant is guilty is a
very rude man and biased. A factor that affects his perceptual
selections is that he sees the environment as hectic and unstable. On
the other hand, he is influenced by the estrangement from his own
teenaged son that causes him to be hateful and hostile toward all
young people. That indicates that learning is a crucial factor, which
affects perception.

Henry Fonda is a liberal-minded, patient truth-and-justice seeker who
uses calm logical reasoning. He is a conscious man that organizes his
perceptions into neat categories and retrieve data quickly in an
organized manner. At the same time, Fonda is motivated to make a fair
judgement in the case and therefore he was determined to defend his

Some of the jurors are prejudiced and have strong stereotypes about
the defendant. For example, one juror believes that the defendant’s
negative background indicates that he is or will become a criminal.

The juries focus on the different opinions among them and they ignore
the real issues in the case that can potentially lead them to a
miscarriage of justice. Added into the mix, there are some jurors who
are anxious to "get this over with" as soon as possible and they are
not really interested if the defendant is guilty or innocent.

2) Do you think that Henry Fonda’s decision to disagree with the
original vote of “guilty” was based on his firm belief that the
defendant was innocent?

I believe that Henry Fonda’s decision to disagree with the original
vote of «guilty» was not based on his firm belief that the defendant
was innocent. At first Fonda bases his vote for the sake of
discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable
doubt that the defendant is guilty.

He supports the belief that a defendant is innocent until proven
guilty. Also he takes into consideration that the case is about a
matter of a life or death of a young man and that must decide wisely
about the verting. Fonda is the voice of reason even as he realises
that this may free a murderer. His strength lies in finding the weak
spots in arguments, which make it easy for the juries to change their

3)Why do you think Henry Fonda was so successful in changing the
attitudes and perceptions of the other members of the jury?

Fonda is the natural leadership of the juries. In addition, he takes

Find Another Essay On The Factors Influencing the Way Each of the Members of the Jury Perceived the Murder in Twelve Angry Men

This is an essay about "12 Angry Men", by Reginald Rose. It describes juror 6 and the cons of the Jury System

942 words - 4 pages play "12 Angry Men" may be intended to show the glory of the United States jury system, the play also serves in showing many of its faults as well. One fault of the jury system is actually the main basis for the jury system, twelve randomly chosen people being chosen to decide on the innocence of a man on trial. The fact that these people are randomly chosen makes it so that uneducated people may be chosen and thus may not be fit to decide on a

Facets Of Human Nature- Twelve Angry Men

972 words - 4 pages Aneeb Adrees - practice sac- Q2) the jurors represent the worst facets of human nature and of soceity itself. Do you agree?In Reginald Roses Twelve angry men, Rose illustrates and explores the worst facets of human nature. Through his depiction of the jurors, and the way they interact, Rose creates an environment where fallibilities of human beings can be examined. Rose depicts prejudice, self-interest along with many other negative traits a

Twelve Angry Men

1149 words - 5 pages Introduction: The movie ?Twelve Angry Men? involves twelve men, all of different ages, chosen for jury duty. Their case, a young boy accused of killing his father. The jurors had to reach a unanimous decision based on whether the boy was innocent or guilty of murder. The twelve men were placed in a small jury room, located inside the courtroom, where it was very warm because of the weather outside. Upon entering the room, each jury member was

Twelve Angry Men Plot

610 words - 2 pages Plot: “Twelve Angry Men” is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night altercation with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the

Twelve angry men

818 words - 3 pages testimony of the woman across the street, the problems with the knife, and the old man who lives in the same building, are the factors that caused reasonable doubt in the jurors minds. Would you believe the kid is innocent? Put yourself back in court. The jurors fill the jury box and the foreman stands. "There's a reasonable doubt in my mind" pg. 155. No one can bring his father back, but at least now he is not going to spend the rest of his life in prison for a crime he never committed. Thanks to those twelve angry men who spend hours going over two testimonies and one piece of evidence.

Twelve Angry Men

1488 words - 6 pages other like kids until they conclude a verdict. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a group of men are summoned for jury duty and almost all of the men would rather conclude a verdict immediately and leave; except for one, Juror #8. He managed to detain the group by requesting for a discussion of the murder trial before voting “guilty” or “not guilty.” Not once did Juror #8 allow the others to influence him unless they had a valid explanation. Often

Twelve Angry Men

664 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and determine truth based only upon the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without any personal bias. In spite of this assumption people will be people and in some cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that shows precisely what I’m talking about is in the movie Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who

Twelve Angry Men

644 words - 3 pages . He was also trying to recreate a situation to see if indeed one of the witnesses on the stand was lying. Quotes like this one convinced me that #8 was very wise and intelligent person: "If he heard anything at all, he still couldn't have identified to voice with the el roaring by..." (The el is a train)I believe Twelve Angry Men situation could happen in the real life, and I am almost certain it has already happened, however I do not

Tension in Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

2071 words - 8 pages Tension in Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men Twelve Angry Men is set in summertime New York, 1957. Where a juvenile delinquent is put on trial for stabbing his violent father in the chest with a unique knife. A jury of twelve men is ordered by the judge to vote guilty if there is no reasonable doubt. In the ballot: eleven vote guilty, but one feels the need to discuss the boy's guilt and the ambiguity of the evidence

Movie Analysis "Twelve Angry Men"

1745 words - 7 pages Movie Analysis Movie Analysis 1 Running head: Movie Analysis on Conflict in Groups Movie Analysis on Conflict in Groups "Twelve Angry Men" Movie Analysis 2 Group communication is the interaction of three or more individuals working together to achieve a common goal. As we know, groups, like the individual members, have different characteristics and concerns

Film Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

2027 words - 8 pages The movie "Twelve Angry Men" is about a young man who is accused of stabbing his father to death. The twelve jurors have to decide whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. If the young man is found guilty, there is a mandatory death sentence (the jury needs to be unanimous in their decision). At the preliminary vote, eleven of the twelve jurors vote the young man guilty. Henry Fonda is the only one who voted the accused as not guilty because

Similar Essays

Twelve Angry Men And The Jurors Of The Kevorkian Trials

2347 words - 9 pages people carry out their death wishes; therefore, his solution was a suicide machine (Chermak 103). In this way, more than 130 were helped by Dr. Kevorkian and his suicide machine (Chua-Eoan). Although Kevorkian was tried five times, he was found innocent four times (Chermak 108-115). His jury had an onerous time coming to their conclusion. Throughout Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, Twelve jurors had to decide the fate of one boy convicted

A Real Twelve Angry Men And The Rodney King Trial

1900 words - 8 pages two months and the jury reached the uttermost biased verdict. After reading the play Twelve Angry Men and researching the Rodney King Beating trial, it is easy to conclude Juror Three would be indecisive about the verdict of this trial. His opinion would waver back and forth because he would have opinions regarding both sides. In the play Twelve Angry Men, Juror Three said, “I’ve got a kid. When he was eight years old he ran away from a fight

Demonstrations Of Leadership In Twelve Angry Men

709 words - 3 pages The film Twelve Angry Men, while great for entertainment alone (who doesn’t like to watch people argue?), helps show aspects of leadership and negotiation. In this film, a jury is attempting to decide whether a boy is guilty of murder, with evidence piled high against him. However, one juror stands firm and says that they should at least give him an hour. This is where the more interesting part of the story begins. At first, Juror Eight was the

My Verdict Of Twelve Angry Men

883 words - 4 pages On Friday, April 18, I attended the Henderson State University production of Twelve Angry Men. Reginald Rose wrote the playwright of Twelve Angry Men and Sherman L. Sergel had it adapted. The performance took place in the Arkansas Hall Studio Theatre on Henderson State campus. Fortunately, I had the opportunity of watching the Good Friday performance of this play and it did everything but disappoint. I didn’t know much about this playwright