This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Framers: Federalists And Anti Federalists Essay

650 words - 3 pages

When the United States declared itself a sovereign nation, the Articles of Confederation were drafted to serve as the nations first Constitution.Under these Articles, the states held most of the power; but due to an almost absent centralized government, colonists were ill-equipped to deal with such practices as regulating trade both between states and internationally, levying taxes, solving inter-state disputes, negotiating with foreign nations, and most importantly enforcing laws under the current notion of "Congress". Realizing that there were several deficiencies in the current system of self-government, the states appointed delegates to ratify the situation and come up with a way to attain the aforementioned practices they needed to be a functional independent nation.
The delegates, also known as the Framers of the Constitution, didn't exactly agree on how to create a new system of government, with two sides emerging both with contrary, but comparable motives on how to keep their country running efficiently. First there were the Federalists, who favored a stronger national government run by elected officials. They believed there was a need to protect both the right to private property and free enterprise that only a unified central government could ensure. Then there were Anti- Federalists who believed that the bulk of duties should continue to be left to each state's own discretion, so that there would be no misrepresentation of the people it governed. It's left to say that neither side saw eye to eye, but would eventually reach a "compromise", the Federalists would institute their version of the Constitution which had a clear notion of Central Government and it's duties. The Anti-Federalists would receive an additional amendment to the Constitution (The Bill of Rights), which would protect the personal liberties they were convinced a Central Government would revoke. Both sides seemed fairly satisfied with the outcome, though there was still fear of that popular tyranny from the outside. But the act of tyranny they should have feared was their own, for...

Find Another Essay On The Framers: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

The Anti-Federalists Essay

985 words - 4 pages Were For, he methodically lays out the Anti-Federalists’ positions and contributions to the constitutional compromise and why he believes that they too should be considered Founding Fathers as well. The Anti-Federalists where seen as those primarily opposed to creating a new constitution and stood against this proposition on nearly every point of the debate. The Anti-Federalists gained their name because they were antagonists to

The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists Essay

802 words - 3 pages division between the American people. These two groups were the federalists, who believed that the constitution was good, and the anti-federalists who thought that the constitution would not be able to protect the rights of the people. These two groups had conflicting views but together, they both wanted the same thing. The same thing was that America should be controlled by the people by the principles of federalism. Both

Beliefs of the Anti-Federalists

753 words - 3 pages was exactly opposite of what they are. According to the proper definition, the Anti-Federalists were really more “Federal” than the so-called Federalists. Many Anti-Federalists felt this way because “they took their bearings from the principles of federalism laid down in the Articles.” (Allen viii) The Anti-Federalists say they stuck with the Articles of Confederation and stayed with the government. Before the Federalists took on their

The Anti-Federalists’ Representation of People

1680 words - 7 pages The Anti-Federalists had many views that were different than those of the Federalists. One the differences that seems to be important, is who they view as “The people”. The Anti-Federalists believed that common people should be able to be active participants of their government; this involvement includes having a say in the laws that are made and the protection of everyday working class people. This common man involvement is reinforced by the

Jeffersonians and the Federalists

730 words - 3 pages Jeffersonians vs. FederalistsDuring the period of 1801-1817, the Jeffersonians and the Federalists were viewed differently when it came to the federal Constitution. The Jeffersonians were viewed as strict constructionists and the Federalists were more of a group of loose constructionists. Although the two parties had their different views on the federal government, they occasionally switched their views to help solve certain situations.The

Comparing the Federalists and Republicans

928 words - 4 pages Practice 3.3.2 Comparing the Federalists and Republicans To what extent were the policies of Presidents Jefferson and Madison a departure from those of Federalist Presidents Washington and Adams? The policies of Presidents Jefferson and Madison differed dramatically from those of Presidents Washington and Adams in that they advocated civil and states' rights instead of favoring a strong central government and preferred an agricultural rather

Democratic-Republicans and Federalists

780 words - 4 pages Revolution and favored American assistance. They desired to limit the role of the national government, choosing local control. Democratic-Republicans feared that the creation of the bank would link private individuals too closely to government institutions. Anti-federalists also argued that the Constitution did not explicitly give the federal government the power to grant such charters; it was unconstitutional. Another difference was on how each

Republicans and Federalists

984 words - 4 pages At the onset of our nation's history, the government was divided primarily into two politcal parties, the Federalists and the Republicans. The Federalists, as the name implies, supported a strong national government and military, and a loose-constructionist view of the new U.S. Constitution. The Republicans, meanwhile, were advocates of states' rights and a weaker central government. The Republican and Federalist Parties, however, did not always

Federalists and Antifederalists

2939 words - 12 pages Hillsborough. In the July heat, sitting in the meeting room of the local Presbyterian Church, William Davie quickly realized the momentous significance of the fact that with local elections for state delegates completed the previous March, the result was that far fewer Federalists were in attendance at the convention. A majority of the 284 delegates present were Antifederalists and had over the previous months repeatedly voiced their fervent

Were the Federalists Democratic?

1256 words - 5 pages Were the Federalists Democratic? The idea of democracy is both vague and is often over-simplified to mean "majority rules". In theory, such a notion sounds both just and efficient. However, in practice, the concept of "majority rules" is much more complex and often difficult to implement. Modern-day versions of democracy, such as the one utilized in the United States, simply guarantees a person's right to voice his or her opinion in all

Federalists in the 19th Century

1319 words - 6 pages The formation of the United States Constitution in 1787 led the people of the United States to divide into two groups: the Federalists and the Anti Federalists. They both agreed in the some political thoughts as well as disagreed. Most distinguishable, the Federalists favored the central government, whereas the Antifederalists opposed it. In order to settle the new country after the Revolutionary War, the Hamilton Federalists best represent the

Similar Essays

Federalists And Anti Federalists Essay

721 words - 3 pages The intent of this essay is to show different viewpoints of federalists and anti-federalist colonists and how they were overcome by compromises to form our constitution. It is important to first understand that the birth of our nation is a result of two major events, which we call founding moments. It all began when various unfair and inconsistent policies of England had changed Colonists goodwill towards the imperial power. Colonists felt

Federalists Vs Anti Federalists Essay

1342 words - 6 pages Constitutional Convention, which was endeavoring to write out a document that would more or less define the political structure and trajectory of the whole country. These two factions were the Federalist and the Anti-Federalists and they’re quarrel was over what a right understanding of federalism, republicanism and America was. While many different issues littered they’re public debate through published tracts, booklets and a litany of news

Federalists Vs Anti Federalists Essay

645 words - 3 pages Constitution called themselves the Federalists, and their opponents, who supported states rights over centralized power, were called the Anti-federalists.The Anti-federalists' arguments against the Constitution represented deep mistrust of centralized government, which found its source in the colonial experience leading up to the revolution. The principle contention of the Anti-federalists was that the national government could never be as

Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists: The Differences Between Federalists And Anti Federalists After America Broke Away From Gb

633 words - 3 pages After America finally broke away from Great Britain, a new system of government was needed to maintain order and protect the rights of the people. Naturally, not everyone agreed on how this should be done, and two groups arose with opposing points of view on how the new American government should be run. These groups were the Federalists and Anti-federalists. The Federalists were in favor of a strong central (federal) government, while the Anti