The Basic Procedures Of A Standard American Criminal Trial...Covers Everything Between Indictment And Sentencing.

2633 words - 11 pages

Procedures of Criminal Trial (American)One of the most vaguely understood events in the United States is the modern criminal trial. Most people have a faint knowledge of the goings-on of criminal proceedings, mainly due to what is seen on television, but the person who knows the real course of a trial is rare. However, there is nothing mysterious about the events that determine criminal guilt. Trials are carefully orchestrated, following procedures that have been laid in legal concrete over the years, and generally follow the same basic format across the United States.Criminal law is distinguishable from civil law in the aspect that criminal acts are officially considered to injure not only individuals, but society as a whole. This is the reason why criminal cases are described as state v. offender. The state, as the injured party, is taking the defendant to court. The purpose of a criminal trial is to determine if the offender is legally guilty of the crime, but this does not necessarily mean that the person in question committed the crime. As opposed to factual guilt (the person 'did it'), legal guilt merely means that a jury of the defendant's peers is convinced without reasonable doubt. As can be seen, this leaves room for possible discrepancies.Before a trial can proceed, certain events must take place. The first is the arraignment of the defendant, which can happen anytime between arrest and a logical, non-specific time before the trial itself. Arraignment consists of the court reading to the defendant the substance of the charge, and calls on the subject to enter a plea within a given time.The defendant may consult with and be advised by an attorney on what plea to offer the court. He may plead guilty or no contest (nolo contendere), in which case a trial does not occur and the subject goes directly to a sentencing hearing, or he may plead not guilty, and trial preparations will proceed. In very rare cases the defendant will not enter a plea, and is said to 'stand mute.' Directly after entering a plea of not guilty, the defendant must decide on one, if any, of many courses of defense to follow. A plea of guilty or no contest that is withdrawn by the defendant cannot be used as evidence against the defendant.One of the most popular defenses is the alibi defense. This course of action holds that the defendant was at another location at the time of the offense, and therefore could not possibly have committed the crime. If an alibi is to be offered, the defendant has a court-appointed time in which he must declare his intentions. The attorney for the state will send a notice describing the time, date, and place of the offense, and the defendant must refute this information. If the defendant issues notice of alibi but then withdraws the claim, this information cannot be held against him later in court.Another popular defense is the insanity defense. The court definition holds that "a person should not be guilty if they did not know what they...

Find Another Essay On The basic procedures of a standard American criminal trial...covers everything between indictment and sentencing.

Essay covers the basic of stress in todays world and several ways of combating it

726 words - 3 pages limits of our threshold are being pushed to succeed. Success is the driving force behind many people pushing their bodies to the limits. A human body needs a delicate balance between work, and relaxation. When this equilibrium is not maintained, problems occur, which might have repercussions later. These repercussions take the forms of "Burnouts", break-downs, and sometimes extreme cases of heart attacks.In most cases of the systems breaking down

The Prosecution’s Indictment of Mr. George Stevens

1247 words - 5 pages The Prosecution’s Indictment of Mr. George Stevens In the story The Garies and Their Friends by Frank Webb, one man is responsible for the race riot. The prosecution charges Mr. George Stevens with Inciting a Riot and Seditious Conspiracy. We intend to prove these charges beyond a reasonable doubt. We will do this by presenting overwhelming evidence of his guilt. He manipulated people and circumstances to his full

American Judaism: Orthodox to Reform and Everything between

2371 words - 9 pages American Judaism: Orthodox to Reform and Everything Between American Jews today identify themselves as Orthodox, Reform, Conservative, or Reconstructionist. These four movements in modern American Judaism are different in many aspects, but one must remember that even though there are differences in the different beliefs of the Jewish movements, that all Jews share a common bond of a history and a destiny. They are one people. These four

Comparison of characteristics and perceptions of the Qld Criminal Justice System, Aboriginal Customary Law and Islamic Criminal Law according to crime and punishment procedures

2946 words - 12 pages within the family. More serious breaches involving the injured family in carrying out retaliation until an equal level of injury was restored.3.0 MethodologyHypothesis:""There are known differences but also strong similarities between the way Islamic law, Australian aboriginal customary law and Queensland criminal justice system operate their crime and punishment procedures"With the researched hypothesis in mind, a investigation process using a

'Consider what you think are the key aims of a criminal trial and explain, with reasons, the extent to which you think the Crown Court or magistrates’

1689 words - 7 pages Within criminal court proceedings, there are two key aims that need to be upheld. Firstly, the trial should be fair, most importantly with respect to the consistency of judgments that are given for comparable offences; additionally, judges and juries must fully consider each case individually. Secondly, a judgment ought to come from a body that is representative of the local population; those making judgments should be without any prejudices

Sentencing Guidelines in the Criminal Justice System

3816 words - 16 pages much more likely to deviate from sentencing guidelines for Caucasians than they are for African Americans (Leonard-Kempf and Sample 2001 p. 121). If a crime involves an African American offender and a Caucasian victim their sentence is more likely to be much harsher (Leonard-Kempf and Sample 2001 p. 121). A great example of sentencing disparity based on race is the issue between crack cocaine and cocaine sentencing. This issue came to light

The OJ Simpson Murder Trial and the Criminal Justice System

2106 words - 8 pages was conducted. With that, the judge in this hearing felt that enough evidence did exist for a criminal trial and OJ Simpson was arraigned on July 29th 1994. At his arraignment OJ pleaded not guilty, specifically stating that he was “one hundred percent not guilty”. Between this time and November 3rd 1994 the jury of 12 was selected out of a venire of 304 perspective jurors. All 304 perspective juror’s had a seventy five page questionnaire to

The Sentencing Of Julius And Ethel Rosenberg

2325 words - 10 pages scapegoats in a time when anti-Communist sentiments were high. During the period of their trial and sentencing, the American climate was one of fear and apprehension toward anything associated with Communism. The United States government and the majority of citizens were determined to destroy anything or person with Communist affiliations (Phillipson 225). The Rosenbergs were accused of helping a country that was an ally at the time. They were tried

The Sentencing of Butch and Willie Bosket

2687 words - 11 pages him because he looked like his father, and she told him that every chance she got. I believe Willie was not only a product of his environment but that he also chose to do the things he did. He was trying to be a tough guy in the beginning and this reputation had to stay with him. Willie started his life of crime at the age of eight; a full year younger than his father was when he started his criminal career. Willie began by stealing from street

Similarities Between To Kill a Mocking Birds and the Scottsboro and Tom Robinson Trial

1334 words - 6 pages The Scottsboro Trial and the Tom Robinson Trial are almost identical in the forms of racism and prejudice shown and the the actual trial and the trials outcome. The racism and prejudice is clear and is a key factor throughout both cases, which took place in the same time period. Both trials are very common when it came to the time period, the time the trials have taken place in, those who were persecuted and lastly, why they were persecuted in

The Trial of a Slave

800 words - 4 pages a woman, a slave, she was “owned” by her master Robert Newsom, and she was African American. Celia had nothing positive going for her simply just because she was an African American woman. “Black female slaves were essentially powerless, unable to legally protect themselves from the physical assaults of either white or black males.” (McLaurin 113) Viewing Celia’s political standpoint throughout her entire trial we can see she basically had no

Similar Essays

Procedures Of American Criminal Trial Essay

2653 words - 11 pages Procedures of American Criminal Trial One of the most vaguely understood events in the United States is the modern criminal trial. Most people have a faint knowledge of the goings-on of criminal proceedings, mainly due to what is seen on television, but the person who knows the real course of a trial is rare. However, there is nothing mysterious about the events that determine criminal guilt. Trials are carefully orchestrated, following

Identify And Evaluate The Roles Of The Prosecution And Defense In A Criminal Trial. Identify & Discuss The Sentencing Powers, Available To A Judge In A Specific Criminal Case

1693 words - 7 pages ), directed the Legal Services Commission to establish a Criminal Defence Service (CDS). This means that every person arrested for a crime, regardless of status, is legally entitled to have a free and independent legal representative present before police interviews commence. This paper will identify and evaluate the roles of the CPS, and the defence through a criminal trial. It will also identify and discuss sentencing powers, including

The Selection And Role Of A Jury In A Criminal Trial

946 words - 4 pages The Selection and Role of a Jury in a Criminal Trial This assignment focuses on how a jury is selected and its role in a criminal trial. The advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to decide the outcome of a criminal case will also be considered. A Jury is chosen at random, by a computer using names on the electoral

A Comparison Between Othello And The Trial

1303 words - 5 pages A Comparison between Othello and The Trial    In the same way that the concept innocence and arrogance appear at cross-purposes, a comparison between "Othello" by William Shakespeare and " The Trial " by Franz Kafka at first sight appears contradictory. On closer analysis however, both these terms and these two works can be shown to have demonstrated the same inseparable idea.   The philosophy of both times introduces the ideas