The Gun Control Debate: Is It A Violation Of The Constitution?

1988 words - 8 pages

The Gun Control Debate: Is it a Violation of the Constitution?
The United States Constitution is regarded as the supreme law of the land. When it was drafted over two centuries ago, the goal of the founding fathers was to provide for the general welfare and common defense of all citizens, establish a more perfect Union and insure domestic tranquility for the United States of America. Unfortunately, this tranquility has been disturbed by unnecessary tragedies at the hand of armed individuals. Tragedies like the Sandy Hook shooting and the Columbine massacre, where armed individuals took the life of innocent civilians mercilessly, have shaken our communities and forced us to take a different approach when it comes to gun safety. Gun control has been the topic of many heated debated in recent years. We have, as a nation, become so accustomed to firearms in our everyday lives whether for protection, hunting, or self-defense, that we have forgotten that firearms are dangerous and deadly weapons. The second amendment of the Constitution grants all individuals the right to bear arm; however, this amendment continues to be used and abused by individuals who chose to interpret it differently than it was originally intended. It is our duty, as citizens of this great nation, to open our eyes wide and realize that this problem is not going to fix itself. Although the right for all individual to bear arm is granted and secure in our Constitution, it is imperative for the safety our population to regulate all gun purchases and tighten by the requirements necessary to purchase a firearm in order to prevent further tragedies from occurring.
Perhaps the most well-known argument given against gun control is that it is a violation of the Constitution. Members of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and other people against gun control are adamant that guns have always been a part of the American culture and any laws restricting the ability to purchase a firearm is a violation of the right to bear arm granted in the Constitution. Our founding fathers found it necessary to include the second amendment in the Constitution which clearly states that all individuals have “the right to keep and bear arms”, therefore it is undeniable that the removal all private ownerships of firearms would be a violation of the Constitution (Chioccetti 2). However, what some people fail to realize is that the issue of gun control is not about the complete removal of firearms in our everyday life. Removing guns to stop further deaths is not the solution to the problem, just like removing cars is not the solution to stop people from driving under the influence. Gun control is about regulating all gun purchases and tightening the requirements necessary to make sure that they do not end up in the hands of a person with malicious intent. Some people may also argue that guns do not kill people, people kill people. The validity in this argument is that a gun in itself is not dangerous without...

Find Another Essay On The Gun Control Debate: Is it a Violation of the Constitution?

Black And White: The Reason Why Gun Control Debate Fails

1922 words - 8 pages Gun control has been being a controversial topic for many years that people try to discuss about it. This issue has become more serious because of many recent tragedies have been happened in the US, and the main reason of those tragedies is lack of control. For example, tragedies in Newtown or Colorado, which everybody has known, took away many lives of innocent children and adults. That is why American citizens think that guns are dangerous and

Gun it a problem Essay

549 words - 2 pages use of guns is necessary. People of the U.S. aren't as rigidly regulated by gun laws compared to our European neighbors. In the United States it takes anywhere from a few days to a couple of weeks to get a permit to carry a handgun. However, in most crimes committed with a handgun, the gun isn't even licensed. More authority is necessary to control the illegal handling of handguns. In England, guns which are permitted for hunting are required to

Is it a Violation? Sterilization of women.

553 words - 2 pages population. It all starts out with the philosophy that a woman can have as many babies as she wants.... IF she doesn't ask the government to take care of them. When she starts asking the government for financial support, they ought to have some control over the woman. Even though the mandatory Norplant has been viewed as a violation of rights, nothing could be further from the truth. Insertion of the Norplant device would take place IF and only IF a

The Ethics of Gun Control

1853 words - 7 pages Constitution is only giving the states the right to regulate militia activity and therefore possess and "bear" arms (Rowland 3). Some of the more extreme anti-gun lobby advocate repealing the Second Amendment altogether. Since the most extreme advocates of gun control wish to ban guns regardless of the Constitution, it becomes necessary to not just examine the law of the land, and the courts interpretation, but also the underlying

Drug Testing is a Violation of the Fourth Amendment

3079 words - 12 pages and the right most valued by civilized men." The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the "right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable search and seizure" except upon probable cause. Random drug testing threatens the Fourth Amendment and has been called suspicion by association. This is to say that it is not possible to justify a search of one person because they are similar to

The necessity of gun control.

972 words - 4 pages requirements about gun awareness and gun ownership? A comprehensive course about gun safety and gun usage should be made mandatory as well a firearms test before a gun licence is issued. 3. Gun control in the form of enforced registration, strict background checks, limitation of concealed weapon licensing as well as extended waiting periods have been cited as effective methods of deterring criminals from gun ownership. In California, over one

Gun Control in Canada. Speaks of how gun control is not in the best interest of society

2657 words - 11 pages An increase in gun control is not in the best interests of society, it just provides a false sense of security. Through out history governments have used guns as a scapegoat for their problems with violent crime. Guns are not the problem when it comes to society's problems with violence, people are. Guns do not commit the crimes people do. You must control the criminals in order to control crime.The history of gun control in Canada has had a

The Debate over Palestine: Is it a State?

1019 words - 4 pages edge of the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River) and it divided the area into two parts; a state for the Jewish and one for the Arab people, Palestine. While Israel was given statehood, Palestine was not. Since 1947, one of the most controversial issues in the Middle East, and of course the world, is the question of a Palestinian state. Because of what seems a simple question, there have been regional wars among Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Syria

The Implementation of Gun Control in Texas

2534 words - 11 pages The implementation of gun control in the United States is a large problem as it will take away the 2nd Amendment rights of citizens, while preventing law abiding citizens from protecting themselves from criminals.( Noyes, 3) The right to bear arms is promised to citizens of the United States. Crime is very high in states that have loose gun control laws. The state of Texas is known to have the most lenient gun control laws of any state in

The Pros and Cons of Gun Control

1654 words - 7 pages to gun violence and homicide. According to ( “The argument is if gun ownership is legally restricted, then all and only law-abiding citizens will be unarmed, and therefor would be the easy prey of criminals and law breakers. It wouldn't effect the criminals and lawbreaker since they don't follow the laws anyway.” holders of the anti-gun control side cite a number of instance where new gun control law result in a increase not decrease

The Politics of Gun Control Legislation

2223 words - 9 pages "currently required of imports." These proposed methods of gun control are criticized for being highly reactionary. For example raising the standard to import quality would eliminate many of the cheaper and more affordable guns from the market. It is a subversive maneuver to deteriorate the gun market and drive up the cost of handguns. The media also plays an important role in the gun control debate. The media has promoted gun control

Similar Essays

The Gun Control Debate Essay

823 words - 3 pages their lifestyles by varying degrees. In a debate as important as this one, it is necessary to develop an arrangement on which both sides can agree. Notes: 1 "The United States Constitution." U.S. Constitution Online. 2 "More Guns, Less Crime (Again) in 2007." National Rifle Association of America. 3 "Gun Control." Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia. WORKS CITED Adams, R. J. "Gun Control." Awesome Library. 2014. Web 30 Apr

Gun Control Debate Essay

1980 words - 8 pages Gun Control Debate PAGE 1 With more restrictions and increased education, firearms can be a safe part of society. Without an individual to operate a firearm there is no potential for either intentional or accidental incidents. According to The National Center for Injury Prevention Control (2008) there were more estimated deaths from medical errors reported between 1999 and 2005 then unintentional shooting deaths. This shows us that although

Gun Control: Should The Second Amendment Of The Constitution Be Updated?

1172 words - 5 pages Brady law to the secondary market of handgun purchases such as gun shows. Under the Brady II legislation it will be illegal to sell, deliver, or otherwise transfer a handgun to someone who does not have an FFL (Federal Firearms License), unless the dealer verifies that the buyer has a valid state handgun license. It will also make it a violation of the law for anyone who does not hold an FFL to obtain, either through purchase or as a gift, a

Gun Control: The Debate Rages On Comparing Canadian To American Gun Control

2698 words - 11 pages brethren, could conceivably lend our gun control laws south of the border. The question is, would our Canadian gun control work down in the States, or is it simply a lost cause, with too many points of view to ever reach a conclusion?One of the major points of debate in the gun control issue is the second amendment. This well known contribution to the American constitution was added in 1791, and states "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the