This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Historical Origins Of The Second Amendment’s Protection To Keep And Bear Arms

1452 words - 6 pages

The origin of the right to keep and bear arms all started with the culture of having guns, then events that brought fear among people, then valid arguments for the need of arms. This explains the historical origin of the second amendment's protection to keep and bear arms. Americans at first had the culture of carrying arms with them for normal life purposes; that is protection, maintaining order in the society, and hunting for food. As time went by in their new settlement areas in America, conflicts developed, and they had to have arms for protection against invasion. The British with their oppressive activities also reinforced Americans’ belief and support for the right to bear arms. The right to keep and bear arms was strengthened by arguments which argued that it was a necessity for the security of the nation; with arms in the hands of civilians, the nations is protected from oppressive acts of the government, and the nation has an advantage of having soldiers everywhere. Below is a full description of the right’s historical origin.
The origin of the right to keep and bear arms is justified by the experiences of the early American people. When the early colonists immigrated to America, they brought guns which they used in their daily lives. They used muskets and short guns to hunt. They also used the guns to fight the Native Americans. When Europeans came to America, they were at first warmly welcomed by the Native Americans who helped them through tough times and shared their food. This relationship did not last long when more Europeans migrated to America. They took away Native American’s land, drove them away, and destroyed their natural way of life. This led to wars between the Native Americans and the colonists therefore, colonists had to carry guns as a safety measure. This conflict and the formation of a larger community led to new developments. The colonists found it necessary to arm every man in the community so that an attack at any time, would find them prepared. The colonies at the time also had slaves and the region was characterised by slave rebellion. Because of this, laws were developed that required Americans to carry guns in case slave rebellion occured. The leaders wanted to make use of everyone who could fight to maintain order in the society. Because of this culture, keeping guns was the right thing to do. People, therefore, had the right to keep and bear arms. Additionally, during these times, there were no police. Having arms was a way of maintaining security within the community. If the community leaders found out that there was a criminal on the loose, they would raise the alarm, and the community would help find the fugitive. The citizens were, therefore, expected to have their own weapons.
When English settlers immigrated to America, they came with their customs, laws, and traditions. These later influenced American Bill of Rights and Constitution, when Americans became independent from the English. The right to...

Find Another Essay On The Historical Origins of the Second Amendment’s Protection to keep and Bear Arms

The Rights of the Second Amendment to Bear Arms

1003 words - 5 pages In recent years gun control has been a very hot topic. The Second Amendment, which was adopted on December 15, 1791 in the Bill of Rights, protected the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. Today that right is being tested by the government who plans to tighten its grips on gun control in America. Should or right to protect ourselves be infringed upon? That’s debatable. Guns play a major role in many criminal acts we see on the news in

Right to Keep, Bear Arms Essay

849 words - 4 pages just wait for the law enforcement to arrive, I will do what is necessary to protect me and my family. Part of the government wants to take away guns from all citizens, but by taking away guns and only the law enforcement and government permitted to have guns this puts the American citizens in danger. This is a way for the government to have more power over its citizens, which the second amendment allows citizens to keep their guns. I believe

The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

1440 words - 6 pages repealing the Second Ammendment the Answer? No it is not. We must think of the result of such a repeal, many people would not stand for it they would take arms to defend the very right being taken away. If the right to keep and bear arms had not been exercised when George Washington led the U.S. to victory over England, our Constitution would not exist, that is why the Second Ammendment is such a sacred one, it is the basis for which the ideas of

The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

1677 words - 7 pages The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms The Second Amendment to the Constitution gave United States citizens the right to bear arms. Although, the Second Amendment stated: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms. However, the framers could not foresee the type of violence we have in our cities today. Innocent citizens have and are being brutally

The Meaning of the Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

1234 words - 5 pages “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(understand) comes from the United States constitution. It has for the last decade or so been a topic of an ongoing debate between the people of this nation. It all depends on how you interpret the 27 words. Most people believe that it gives United States citizens the right to bear arms. The

The Security of a Free State: This essay points out some of the major flaws in the argument for strict gun control and argues for the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms

1081 words - 4 pages the world a safer place for kids. On the other side, we have the National Rifle Association, a 4 million-member group that lobbies for more liberal gun laws, in accordance with our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. While firearm opponents have strong convictions and beliefs, people supporting the right to own and use a gun have logic on their side. The power to keep and bear arms, which the second amendment of our constitution grants to

This essay is about the Second Amendment and whether its meaning was for personal gun use or military gun use. It is based on the book "Whose Right to Bear Arms Did the Second Amendment Protect?"

622 words - 2 pages to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." (65) What does this mean? According to the Federalists, it guaranteed a strong central government who had control of the militia. They believed a militia was needed to keep the country in order and protect citizens from tyranny, especially by the mob, outside invaders, and corrupt individuals within the government.With guns in the hands of the individual, a militia was needed to stop rebellious

The Bill of Rights and the Right to Bear Arms

1244 words - 5 pages over one of the amendments. The controversy is whether or not the second amendment guarantees citizens of the United States the right and protection to keep and/or bear weapons. Some people may raise the question whether or not the second amendment protects an individuals’ right to bear arms or not? If so, is it a federal or state right to bear arms? What is the purpose of the second amendment, and does it create a conflict with the National

The Right To Bear Arms

1073 words - 5 pages Wisconsin to New York, Milwaukee City has three times the murder rate of New York City. I am convinced that this is due to the fact that New York has the right to carry firearms. I believe that law in Wisconsin defies our natural rights and should be declared invalid, as stated in the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being the necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

The Rights to Bear Arms

1183 words - 5 pages limitations are placed on guns, they will only stop the average American from obtaining a gun. The real criminals out there will still be able to obtain guns through the black market. Every American should have the right to protect them self. The second amendment to the constitution of the United States says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

The Right to Bear Arms

565 words - 2 pages After our Constitution was ratified in 1789 some congressmen were still unhappy. They demanded that some changes or "amendments" needed to be made. These changes were listed in what became the Bill of Rights. An issue that the early Americans found very relevant and important at this time was the right to bear arms. As a result they ratified the second amendment to our constitution which reads "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the

Similar Essays

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1677 words - 7 pages bear arms has been a topic of extreme controversy in this century and can be argued equally from both sides. The first side says that it is our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. On the flip side, it is too dangerous and would increase the number of violent crimes. No matter which side is right, there has to be a middleman to regulate the extent of "the right to bear arms". Up to the 1900's people didn't even second-guess this

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1292 words - 6 pages State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It guarantees the people’s right to keep and bear arms. The opposition may say that we should interpret this to mean that citizens may carry arms for a “well regulated militia” but not concealed personal carry. However, nowadays, even if we do not need to carry arms for such a purpose as we have an actual police force and military for such a purpose, we have our personal

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms In The Usa

1209 words - 5 pages “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” These words have become forgotten as individuals, former member of the U.S. Supreme Court John Paul Stevens, attempt to strip away the individual aspect of the second amendment. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. However, if more

Americans Have The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1547 words - 6 pages States of America have the right to keep and bear arms.      The controversy about the Second Amendment is derived from how it is worded (Jordan). The debate about the wording can be broken into two different arguments. To understand the arguments it is important to know how the Amendment is worded. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms