The Ideas Of Hobbes Vs Locke

964 words - 4 pages

Hobbes Vs. LockeNick CappyThomas Hobbes and John Locke were English philosophers who attended Oxford University. Hobbes was born in Westport, England and Locke was born in Wrington. These two philosophers became famous because of their ideas about politics and the understanding of human nature. Thomas Hobbes had a very negative view on human nature. He describes human nature as being constantly at war with one another. According to Hobbes, all people were made equal in body and mind by nature. Somebody could be smarter or stronger than someone else but when looking at man as a whole, we are equal in both body and mind. "For such is the nature of men, that howsoever they may acknowledge many others to be more witty, or more eloquent, or more learned; yet they will hardly believe there be many so wise as themselves...everyman is contented with his share." Hobbes states that there are three natural causes of constant war. The first being competition, which is for gain. The second is diffidence, which is for safety and the third is glory, which is for reputation. He believes that people naturally want to harm each other and that that is the reason laws had to be made. Hobbes thinks that man is greedy and envious and that the reason we are at war with one another is because we were created equal but we are now being pushed to become unequal by possessions and money.John Locke, on the other hand, had a very different view on human nature. Locke believes that man is constantly at war with nature. He believes that man protects himself, by human nature, and while doing this men protect one another. He thinks that people get all of their ideas from experience. In other words, he believes that mankind would not be where it is today if it wasn't for experience. Locke claims that man can question anything. This is because of curiosity and the only way to satisfy curiosity is to explore whatever you were curious about. According to Locke, we do not know the truth and we cannot comment on anything that we have not experienced personally. Locke believes that man's nature is to look out for himself first but then never forget about everyone else.These two ideas are very different but, at the same time, they are also the same in many ways. One way that these ideas are similar is that both Locke and Hobbes believe that man is selfish. Hobbes believes that man cares about himself and no one else. Whereas Locke believes that man looks out for himself first but, always remembers everyone else. They both believe that man is always at war. In Hobbes opinion, man is at war with man. Man vs. Man. In Locke's case, on the...

Find Another Essay On The Ideas of Hobbes VS Locke

Hobbes vs. Locke--Who Was Correct? Essay

1088 words - 4 pages John Locke believes that man is good; Thomas Hobbes believes that man is evil. One can look at man in these two ways. In Locke's view, man's intentions are benevolent by nature and can live without a central government telling them what exactly to do. Hobbes, the antagonist, believes the complete opposite--that man is brutal by nature and cannot live without a central government running everyone's life. In today's society, Hobbes's philosophy on

Hobbes and Locke: The Power Debate

1393 words - 6 pages another civil war. On the other hand, John Locke lived and wrote forty years later, after the Glorious Revolution. His ideas developed in the context of a period in which individual’s rights and power were emphasized. He believed that individuals needed freedom from control to reach their full potential. Hobbes became an advocate for absolutism--the belief that because humans are naturally power seeking, a sovereign is needed to maintain peace, and the

The ideas of Machiavelli, Locke, Shakespeare, Montaigne, and Achebe

1427 words - 6 pages Never is it easy for a writer to organize his ideas with those of past writers and have a noticeable effect on the world of his times. This is especially the issue as a writer uses ideas spanning nearly six centuries before him. The thoughts and writings of Niccolo Machiavelli, William Shakespeare, and John Locke, as well as their premises about nature, are what Chinua Achebe very closely parallels.Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1530), an Italian

Locke, Hobbes and the Good Life: The Proper Role and extent of Government

1792 words - 7 pages The political philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke revolve around the proper role and extent of government. Their two philosophies have extensive similarities but in the end are wholly different when it comes to the quality of life they provide for their subjects. The differences lie in whether they provide mere life or the good life for their subjects. Aristotle laid out the basic ideas of mere life versus the good life when he stated

Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx

772 words - 3 pages In the idea of human nature; origin of state, the nature of government, the rights of regulation can be drawn as the reflection of insightful philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx. By understanding this within the context of human nature, we can see their ideas play to how they perceive a modern philosophy. Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto illustrates the desire to build "a society without economic classes". John Locke's

differences between the social contract theory of john locke and thomas hobbes

2347 words - 9 pages a common enemy. He advocated for an established order. Hence, Individualism, materialism, utilitarianism and absolutions are inter-woven in the theory of Hobbes. Analysis of the theory of Social Contract by John Locke  John Locke theory of Social Contract is different than that of Hobbes. According to him, man lived in the State of Nature, but his concept of the State of Nature is different as contemplated by Hobbesian theory. Lockeǯ

Comparison of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Human Nature

1546 words - 6 pages out war. In contrast to Hobbes’ pessimistic outlook, Locke places trust in the goodness of human nature. “This equality of men by nature . . . [obligates] mutual love amongst men, on which he builds the duties they owe one another . . . the great maxims of justice and charity” (Locke 8). While Hobbesian equality turns men against each another in the pursuit of similar desires, Locke’s state of equality encourages charity. Locke believes human

Nature vs. Nurture: John Locke on Innate Ideas

1705 words - 7 pages In book one of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke argues against innate ideas using three arguments. The intention of this paper will be to discuss John Locke’s views on ideas while introducing and explaining his three arguments against innate ideas in detail touching on his idea of tabula rasa. Furthermore, it will briefly discuss alternative views on innate ideas as both conflicting and similar. John Locke’s writings came at

It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in regards to social contract, the state of nature and each of their ideal governments

1843 words - 7 pages HOBBES, LOCKE AND ROUSSEAUTHE STATE OF NATUREHobbes invites us to take place in a thought experiment where equals and nonequals are placed together in a state of nature without the existence of a state power placed over them. Hobbes believes that the people will soon lapse into a state of war where each person is threatened with violent attack. He says the conflict is caused by three basic factors, which are, competition, diffidence and glory

The philosophy of thomas hobbes

1199 words - 5 pages ."(184) All me are equally vulnerable and can all be killed. Thus in the state of nature it is every man for himself. I agree with this view on the state of nature, I see many of the same ideas come to truth in today's society even though it is not a state of nature in Hobbes' or my view. If you were one of two people striving for the very same goal, which is limited to only one of you achieving, what would you do? These two people become enemies

The Philosophy of John Locke

1560 words - 6 pages , thus choosing to live in the Christian freedom that demonstrably leads into Hobbes’ definition of property. In this discourse, it is clear that some men have more of a reasoning capacity to use land and resources more efficiently, but Locke does not discuss why anyone would want to store away value in the form of money. Man, by consenting to the system of labor, property, and currency proposed by Locke, lay the foundation for the

Similar Essays

John Locke Vs Thomas Hobbes Essay

688 words - 3 pages peace, security, and protection from one another. John Locke embraced many of the ideas presented by Hobbes in his theories on the state of nature and the rise of government. They differed however, in that Locke believed that God was the prime factor in politics. He believed that individuals were born with certain rights given not by government or society, but by God. This he said, is what gives all people equality. Locke said in the state of

Thomas Hobbes Vs. John Locke: Who Is The True Liberal?

1685 words - 7 pages new, non-traditional form of government in which individual liberty is preserved as much as possible. Liberals are characterized by their aversion to the old feudal system of government, which relies on divine authority and the absolute sovereignty of kings as the basis of government. These ideas expose another difference between the philosophies of Hobbes and Locke, in that Hobbes supports the old system of government (monarchy), while Locke

The Enlightenment: Hobbes Versus Locke Essay

920 words - 4 pages governmental changes; these cries manifested themselves in the form of the American and French Revolutions. The American Constitution and the Bill of Rights are both products of the Enlightenment and ideas of the philosophes, in particular John Locke.The political theorist and elitist, John Locke (1632-1704) wrote the "Second Treatise on Government", in this work he hypothesized that man is naturally a social animal, characterized by reason and

The Natural Ways Of Locke, Hobbes, And Rousseau

1382 words - 6 pages In today’s society, human nature is a commonly used term. On the other hand, there is not just one concept of human nature, but rather a plethora of concepts surrounding the idea. With the rise of capitalism, social structure is reformed; it is during this rise in the early seventeenth and eighteenth century, that John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau introduce their varying opinions surrounding man in nature. The western