The Significance Of Reason, Discussed In John Locke's "The Second Treatise Of Civil Government", And In Jean Jacques Rousseau's, "Emile"

1353 words - 5 pages

The significance of reason is discussed both in John Locke's, The Second Treatise of Civil Government, and in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's, Emile. However, the definitions that both authors give to the word "reason" vary significantly. I will now attempt to compare the different meanings that each man considered to be the accurate definition of reason.John Locke believed that the state "all men are naturally in ... is a state of perfect freedom" (122), a state in which they live "without ... depending upon the will of any other man" (122). It is called the "the state of nature," and it is something that is within us at birth. The state of nature is a law made by God, called the Law of Reason. This law gives humankind liberty, freedom, and equality and stresses that no man "ought to harm another in his life, liberty, or possessions" (123). According to Locke, the law of reason is the basis of man as well as society. It restrains men from infringing on the rights of others. In this state, there is no need for a central authority figure to govern the actions of people, for it is the people, themselves, who impose the "peace and preservation of mankind" (124). One can have perfect freedom as long as one does not disturb others in their state of nature; in this "state of perfect equality ... there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another" (124). Men, thereby, have the power to "preserve the innocent and restrain offenders" (124) and punish those who transgress against them and disturb their "state of nature." Thus, all men are their own "executioner[s] in the law of nature," or the Law of Reason.While all men are in charge of their own will according to the Law of Reason in which they are born, some men do, in fact, break or reject this law, which causes them to enter into a state of war with the others. People reject the law of nature for many reasons, especially when their ideas and opinions differ. When people reject the law, two things can happen; the first is that one could enter into a state of war with someone else, and the other is that one could choose to enter into a state of society. It is reason that ultimately leads a person into the state of society through a social contract.In these societies, it is reason, the law of nature, which governs mankind. Reason is not flexible because it is God's law and it is set in stone. This reason gives you the social contract, leading to life, liberty, and happiness. To Locke, it is crucial for men to enter into the social contract as soon as possible. Since we are born into the state of nature in which the law of reason governs us, it is easy for us to enter into society when we are young. This is because that very society is based on reason, not upon feelings or intuition. When men leave their state of nature and conform to society and the government, they give up their right to punish others, as they see fit. Instead, the social contract exists to protect people from those who transgress by...

Find Another Essay On The Significance of Reason, discussed in John Locke's "The Second Treatise of Civil Government", and in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's, "Emile"

John Locke in Leviathan and Second Treatise of Government

1545 words - 7 pages When initially looking at the arguments of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke in Leviathan and Second Treatise of Government, they seem to agree on many things. Both philosophers believe that human reasoning is based on appetites and aversions, that humans have a fundamental right to self-preservation, and, above all, that a strong central government is the way to remedy the problems with the state of nature. However, after looking closely, many

Conflicting Visions of Freedom in John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty and John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government

1525 words - 7 pages John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty and John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government are influential literary works while which outlining the theoretical framework of each thinkers optimal state propose two conflicting visions of the very essence of man and his freedom. Locke and Mill have completely different views when it comes to how much freedom man should have in political society because they have obtained different views about man’s potential

Revenge and Justice in the Iliad and Second Treatise of Government

1269 words - 6 pages Homer’s epic poem, the Iliad, and John Locke’s political philosophy essay, Second Treatise of Government, are two different types of literary works with different purposes, but they both strongly touch upon the themes of vengeance and justice. The nature of revenge is agreed upon, but its role in each of the two works is different. Locke implies absolute justice whereas Homer implies both absolute justice and subjective justice that is seen by

Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The Social Contract

3546 words - 14 pages under the laws imposed by the ruler. Locke in his 'second treatise on civil government' differed slightly from Hobbes, by concluded that individuals in a state of nature would cohere and provide a neutral entity that would protect lives and property by introducing laws. David Hume was a critic of Hobbes and Lockes versions of the social contract. Firstly he points out that there had never been a situation called the state of nature' and that no-one

The Role of Education in Society as Discussed by Emile Durkheim, Pierre Bourdieu, and John W. Meyer

571 words - 2 pages Theorists have long discussed the value of education in society as evidenced by the writings of Emile Durkheim, Pierre Bourdieu, and more recently John W. Meyer. Emile Durkheim believed in the theory of structural functionalism and its ability to provide social order. Durkheim felt institutions were a social fact that made the machine of society work in an orderly fashion. Education, being an institution has a standard set of rules accepted

Explaining the Origins and Evils of Society in Second Treatise of Government by Locke and Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by Rousseau

1262 words - 6 pages Second Treatise of Government by John Locke and Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by Jean-Jacques Rousseau are books written to try and explain the origin of society. Both try to explain the evils and inequalities of society, and to a certain degree to discuss whether man in his natural state is better than man in society. These political science based theories do not appear, at first, to have anything in common with J. Hector St. John De

John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract

1373 words - 5 pages government. Two well-known and most influential thinkers of this time were the English political philosopher John Locke and the French political philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. These two men had laid down some of the intellectual grounds of the modern day government and both had different opinions on what the government’s role in a society. John Locke published his Two Treatises of Government in 1690. In his writing Locke argued that

Jean Jacques Rousseau's Influence on Mary Shelley's Creature

1216 words - 5 pages “advanced” and before any society, there was a time when nothing mattered except self preservation. But things have changed; things always change and evolve. Throughout humanity society was developed into what it is today. Jean-Jacques Rousseau describes these steps in detail. He describes how society came about and how it has created evil. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, shows the evolution of human society through the Creature according to Jean

Why John Locke's government is the best choice to use

668 words - 3 pages How would you like to elect your own officials, be treated equally, and have the option to rebel if your rights are not looked after? John Locke's government allows people who's rights are not being upheld to rebel against the government. Locke's government is also an Indirect Democracy which works well and keeps order throughout the country. The citizens in this form of government are allowed to chose the leader they feel will most likely look

Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

2042 words - 8 pages Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all dealt with the issue of political freedom within a society. John Locke's “The Second Treatise of Government”, Mill's “On Liberty”, and Rousseau’s “Discourse On The Origins of Inequality” are influential and compelling literary works which while outlining the conceptual framework of each thinker’s ideal state present

John Locke's Influence on Government

1135 words - 5 pages John Locke was born in Wrington, a village in Somerset, on August 29, 1632. He lived to become the most influential people in England, and perhaps one of the most influential people in the seventeenth century. His mother died while he was still an infant, and his father was a "Country lawyer@ and a small land owner who served as a captain of horse in the Parliamentary Army during the Civil War. Locke=s father later died in 1961.John Locke was an

Similar Essays

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan And John Locke's Second Treatise Of Government

2995 words - 12 pages Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Second Treatise of Government Hobbes’ Leviathan and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes’ and Locke’s writings center on the definition of the “state of nature” and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors

Jean Jacques Rousseau's The State Of War

1096 words - 4 pages Jean-Jacques Rousseau's "The State of War" Jean-Jacques Rousseau's "The State of War" elegantly raises a model for confederative peace among the states of Europe, and then succinctly explains its impossibility. Rousseau very systematically lays out the benefits of such a "perpetual peace" through arguments based only in a realism of pure self-interest, and then very elegantly and powerfully turns the inertia of the self-interest machinery

John Locke: Second Treatise Of Civil Government

903 words - 4 pages Civil Government and Locke The Second Treatise of Government provides Locke's theorizes the individual rights and involvement with the government; he categorizes them in two areas -- natural rights theory and social contract. 1.Natural state; rights which human beings are to have before government comes into being. 2.Social contact; when conditions in natural state are unsatisfactory, and there's need to develop society into functioning of

Property In Second Treatise Of Civil Government And Robinson Crusoe

2557 words - 10 pages Property in Second Treatise of Civil Government and Robinson Crusoe              Both John Locke's Second Treatise of Civil Government and Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe deal with the question of property. In these two texts, the following questions arise: when does common property become an individual's property; and what factors make the appropriation of property justifiable or not? These questions may be answered by looking at each