This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Insanity Defense: Crazy Or Not?

687 words - 3 pages

The article "The Insanity Defense and the Unabomber Trial" by Barbara Sarason of the University of Washington touches on a number of important questions for all members of our society to consider. The insanity defense is used in only approximately one percent of felony cases and succeeds only a rare amount of the time, yet on television and in courtroom fiction it is depicted as being a common technique used by cunning defense lawyers. Shows like "Law and Order" are more responsible for shaping the public's opinion about legal dilemmas such as the insanity defense than factual court cases. This may skew public opinion, but in many ways the same questions are to be asked.Many people, such as the one of the victims of the Unibomber's actions, believe that regardless of one's state of mind, one should be judged and punished based on the actions taken. Even a person who is "mentally ill" should be punished the same as everyone else in society who has raped, killed, or otherwise taken an illegal path in life. The insanity plea, in many people's opinions, is just a trick to try to keep people from being responsible for their own actions. It might be seen as a similar social problem that the insanity plea exists as people who do stupid things, like keep a cup of hot coffee between their legs while driving and wind up spilling it, can sue someone else for their own actions to displace their own blame.However, people who do not think that the insanity defense should be admitted are perhaps uninformed or misinformed on a number of important aspects of this dilemma. For example, most people do not realize the conditions of prisons. The way the prison sytem is set up, prisoners are given no chance of rehabilitation in most cases, and the abuse and mistreatment that takes place behind bars is actually a way to foster criminal behavior. People who are sent to prison are more likely to come out violent offenders than they were when they went in there. If someone is mentally weak in...

Find Another Essay On The Insanity Defense: Crazy or Not?

The Insanity Defense Essay

2225 words - 9 pages known what they were doing at the time or not have realized their actions were wrong. (Insanity defense among the states ) Despite the fact that people plead insanity it is not confirmed they will be granted that permission and there is no possible way to prove that they were actually insane at the time, the insanity defense is needed because it is a right that we are entitled to use and some people really were not aware of what they were doing so

The Insanity Defense Essay

1170 words - 5 pages Each state, and the District of Columbia, has its own statute outlining the standard for determining whether a defendant is legally insane, therefore not responsible, at the time the crime is committed. “An insanity defense is based on the theory that most people can choose to follow the law; but a few select persons cannot be held accountable because mental disease or disability deprives them of the ability to make a rational / voluntary

The Insanity Defense

1377 words - 6 pages The first claim of the insanity defense recorded can be found in Hammurabi’s code which dates back to around 1772 BC. The Code of Hammurabi is a Babylonian law code of ancient Iraq, formerly Mesopotamia. Back when the Roman Empire ruled the government found convicted people to be non-compos mentis. This means without mastery of mind and not guilty for their criminal actions. There have been many different types of test over the years to

The Insanity Defense, "Innocent by Reason of Insanity", Should be Reformed or Abolished

1909 words - 8 pages States, or it should be abolished in all criminal cases.The controversy over the insanity defense comes from the many different interpretations of insanity and the different notions of how to deal with those people who are truly insane. The insanity and incompetence defenses are considered by many to be defenses by excuse, where a defendant may argue that he/she should not be held criminally liable for breaking the law, as they were mentally ill

The Hinckley Trial and the Insanity Defense

1237 words - 5 pages , and medications. (Dan Greenberg, Psychiatric Treatments) The John Hinckley Trail was an assassination crime towards the president Ronald Reagan of the United States of America. The prosecution raised a defense against the defendant saying he was full aware of his actions and should be tried guilty for the murder of the president. The defendant stated not guilty by claim of insanity. Hinckley had an interest in famous crimes, and he studied

Answers whether the insanity defense has a useful fuinction

1162 words - 5 pages agreement among psychiatrists as to the meaning of this illness or whether or not it really exists. Some psychiatrists call mental illness a myth. The psychoanalyst has not been successful in treating or predicting mental illness. The insanity defense is impractical in its present usage and should therefore be abolished.If you could create your own rules for determining insanity in criminal trials, what would they be? How would they differ from existing

Andrea Yates and The Evolution of Insanity Defense

1919 words - 8 pages The criteria for insanity has changed due to the different criminal cases that people are faced with and there isn’t a fine line between sanity and insanity. From what I have researched, I find that there could be a fine line drawn between sanity and insanity. My criterion for insanity is for a person not to know the difference between right and wrong. My criteria matched well with the M’Naghten Rule which states, “Defendant either did not

Is The Current Law Defense of Insanity Ineffective?

2143 words - 9 pages criticisms. Some academics have argued that even if the D meet the legal definition of insanity and do not meet the medical criteria for insanity, is sentenced to medical care anyway. Another criticism is that the rules are not able to distinguish if the D is dangerous for the public or not or if the D is suffering from temporary or permanent mental condition. Additionally, some academics have argued that this rule makes it too easy for a D with a

The Insanity Defense Part I When is the insanity plea a reasonable and

866 words - 3 pages severe. This (Insanity Defense) is an endeavor to place in morality into our so called perfect law because there is no perfect test to know if the acclaimed criminal is insane or not. Contrary to what a few people who have lost their loved ones through the act of an insane person, and most people who oppose the insanity plea say, a person who commits a crime and at the time the crime was committed he was not in his correct sate of mind and cannot

The Defence of Duress or The Defense of Necessity

2050 words - 9 pages The defense of duress is available where a defendant commits a crime to prevent the greater of death or serious injury to himself or another threatened by a third party. On the other hand, the defense of necessity refers to circumstances where a person chooses to commit an offence to avoid a greater evil to them or another which would result from objective dangers arising from the circumstances in which they are placed . The

The war with Iraq, self-defense or assault

992 words - 4 pages You've heard it before: people claiming that Saddam Hussein is an intolerable threat to the security of our country and that he must be eliminated. The question now is whether or not this statement is accurate. Is Saddam Hussein really a serious threat to our nation? Is it really fair for us to attack another nation simply because we've made an assumption of what might come next? Some will claim that the very idea of attacking a nation just

Similar Essays

“I’m Crazy I Swear. Now Let Me Off”: The Insanity Defense

2390 words - 10 pages insanity. His defense: “not guilty by reason of insanity.” Should he be let off? The insanity plea should be changed to “guilty by reason of insanity” to protect the justice of the American people. Criminals should not be able to get out on an insanity plea, or be treated any differently. Their physical body committed the crime, therefore they should be charged for it, no matter the state of mind they were in. Former U.S president Ronald

Insanity Defense: Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity (Ngri)

2964 words - 12 pages Institute, which had a hand in development of the particular test) or the “Durham Test” sought to acquit the person in question, if the accused was a “product” of mental illness. The most controversial test of the NGRI defense is called “Temporary Insanity.” “Temporary Insanity” is not a distinct test; rather it has to do with the how much time passed during an insane episode. The majority of the available tests for NGRI defenses are subject to

Defense Of The Insanity Defense Essay

2558 words - 10 pages Defense of the Insanity Defense: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffery Dahmer, James Holmes, and Andrea Yates: all are perpetrators of violent crimes, and all claim insanity as the reason. In recent years, it seems that the verdicts of many major violent crimes have come down to whether the defendant is accountable for their actions or if they should be held Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI). This verdict more commonly known as the Insanity Defense

Against The Insanity Defense Essay

1238 words - 5 pages matter? Other problems associated with the insanity defense include how to actually determine mental illness, justifiable placement of those judged mentally ill, and its overall usefulness (Chiacchia 2001).The general public also has issues with the use of the insanity defense. They feel that NGRIs result in a shorter or non-existent prison/institutionalization, that the mentally ill should not be treated like normal citizens once released, and that