The Case Of Mitchell V. Wisconsin

2986 words - 12 pages

On June 11, 1993, the United State Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin'spenalty enhancement law, which imposes harsher sentences on criminalswho "intentionally select the person against whom the crime...iscommitted..because of the race, religion, color, disability, sexualorientation, national origin or ancestry of that person." ChiefJustice Rehnquist deliverd the opinion of the unanimous Court. Thispaper argues against the decision, and will attempt to prove theunconstitutionality of such penalty enhancement laws.On the evening of October 7, 1989, Mitchell and a group of youngblack men attacked and severely beat a lone white boy. The group hadjust finished watching the film "Mississippi Burning", in which ayoung black boy was, while praying, beaten by a white man. After thefilm, the group moved outside and Mitchell asked if they felt "hypedup to move on some white people". When the white boy approachedMitchell said, "You all want to fuck somebody up? There goes a whiteboy, Go get him." The boy was left unconscious, and remained in acoma for four days. Mitchell was convicted of aggravated battery,which carries a two year maximum sentence. The Wisconsin jury,however, found that because Mitchell selected his victim based onrace, the penalty enhancement law allowed Mitchell to be sentenced toup to seven years. The jury sentenced Mitchell to four years, twicethe maximum for the crime he committed without the penalty enhancementlaw.The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling was faulty, and defied a number ofprecedents. The Wisconsin law is unconstitutional, and is essentiallyunenforceable. This paper primarily focuses on the constitutionalarguments against Chief Justice Rehnquist's decision and the statuteitself, but will also consider the practical implications of theWisconsin law, as well as a similar law passed under the new federalcrime bill (Cacas, 32). The Wisconsin law and the new federal law arebased on a model created by the Anti- Defemation League in response toa rising tide of hate-related violent crimes (Cacas, 33). Figuresreleased by the Federal Bureau of Investigation show that 7,684 hatecrimes motivated by race, religion, ethnicity, and sexual orientationwere reported in 1993, up from 6,623 the previous year. Of thosecrimes in 1993, 62 percent were racially motivated (Cacas, 32).Certainly, this is a problem the nation must address. Unfortunately,the Supreme Court of the United States and both the Wisconsin andfederal governments have chosen to address this problem in a way thatis grossly unconstitutional."Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,or prohibiting the free exercise therof; or abridging the freedom ofspeech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceablyassemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."The most obvious arguments against the Mitchell decision are thosedealing with the First Amendment. In fact, the Wisconsin SupremeCourt ruled that the state statute was unconstitutional...

Find Another Essay On The case of Mitchell v. Wisconsin

The Case of Plessy v. Ferguson

1026 words - 4 pages state's rights.5.Separation by race and equality are incompatible. For example, in the case of education. Separation alone implies a sense of inferiority of one race to the superiority of another. Although the physical factors may be equal in a white school and a black school, the segregation and the inequality it implies can severely damage the mind of a student.6.An example of separation that does not mean inequality is separate bathrooms for men

Analysis of the Brown v Board of Education Case

3216 words - 13 pages It is imperative to note that the case of Brown v Board of Education is based on a chronological history of the fight towards realization of human rights in the United States. This essay shall begin by discussing the history chronologically and accessing it whilst the essay goes along. It is clear that even though the United States constitution guaranteed equal rights to all men, the issue of slavery prevailed under violation of other human

The Supreme Court case of Reno v. ACLU

549 words - 2 pages consequences of this right endanger millions of Internet users on a daily basis. If the CDA had been passed, online predators and harassers would not be as protected, and many deaths, rapes, and fights could have been prevented.ACLU. "Your Constitutional Rights." Web. 4 Oct. 2009. .Cyber Rights and Cyber Liberties. "Materials Related to the American Civil Liberties Union v Reno Case." 29 June 1997. Web. 4 Oct. 2009. .Enerything2. "Reno v. ACLU." Web. 4 Oct. 2009. .Learning To Give, Steve Germani. "Freedom of Speech." Web. 4 Oct. 2009. .

The Arizona v. Fulminante Case

1769 words - 7 pages his stepdaughter, Jeneane Fulminante, the trial court used his confession as evidence to sentence him to death. However, since his confession was “coerced”, the Supreme Court decided to retry Fulminante’s case without the use of the “coerced” confession as evidence. Arizona v. Fulminante manifests an undeniably vital constitutional issue. Were his confessions coerced and, therefore, inadmissible as evidence (Appleby 119)? Did the trial court

The Necessity of Legalizing Wolf Hunting in Wisconsin

1393 words - 6 pages Over the past several years, the gray wolf, native to the Wisconsin area, has been listed federally as an endangered species due to the graphic and horrific treatment they had received during the industrialization periods of America, when they were frowned upon and hated because they are predatory creatures and did, on occasion, attack livestock and pets. Because the government was encouraging the hunting, including bounties for the animals

Case of Canada v Bedford Analysis

2023 words - 8 pages In the case of Canada v. Bedford, three sex workers in Ontario Canada, Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch and Valerie Scott, challenged the Charter as they stated that the following sections in the Criminal Code violate the rights promised and protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; CC s 210, CC s. 212(1) (j), and CC s. 213(1) (c). These sections “make it an offence to keep or be in a bawdy-house, prohibit living on the avails of

Case Analysis of US v. Emerson

2851 words - 11 pages Case Analysis of US v. Emerson This case deals with the Defendant's possession of a firearm while under a restraining order, and the charges incurred by the Defendant for such firearm possession. Under Texas law, the possession of a firearm by Mr. Emerson creates a perceivable threat to members of his family, thus creating a violation of the restraining order against him. Apparently common practice in Texas, the restraining order was filed

Furman v. Georgia: The Death Penalty Case

2166 words - 9 pages finished their report an awaited the case. Both attorneys thought that this case would not be a long one. They thought that the final decision of Furman v. Georgia would be decided at the Georgia Supreme Court. They were wrong. “The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Furman's conviction and death sentence on 24 April 1969, but on 3 May 1969 Chief Justice W. H. Duckworth stayed the execution so that Furman could file a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court

Furman v. Georgia: The Death Penalty Case

1039 words - 5 pages "the death penalty served to discourage [or deter] crime and also satisfied the public's moral outrage when terrible crimes were committed,” (Supreme Court Cases: Furman v. Georgia).” The state of Georgia also had to submit an argument before the case. They tried to have a wide-ranged argument because they had no clue of what Mayfield’s argument would be. They would argue that the death penalty was constitutional, and that it was not cruel and

Summary and key notes on the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

845 words - 3 pages petitioner could not take race into account in making admissions decisions, the program was held to violate the Federal and State Constitutions and Title VI. Respondent's admission was not ordered, however, for lack of proof that he would have been admitted but for the special program. A related case is DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), in which Marco DeFunis, Jr., applied for admission as a first-year student at the University of Washington Law School

Robert Bork's "The Right of Privacy". An examination of the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut.

877 words - 4 pages Robert Bork's The Right of Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut. Bork's 'originalist' view proclaimed that Justice Douglas erroneously interpreted the right of privacy from the Constitution. The originalist view is that judges must strictly adhere to the language of the Constitution, thus people do not have a general right to privacy because it was never actually written into the Constitution. This view severely restricts

Similar Essays

The Court Martial Of Billy Mitchell

509 words - 2 pages The Court Martial of Billy Mitchell General William “Billy” Mitchell of the U.S. Army – Air Corp was a forward thinking officer who saw a need for the military to create an Air Force as a separate branch within the military structure. General Mitchell could foresee that technological advances would make air warfare an integral part of combat power in future operations. The military heirarchy, however, did not agree with his assessment. The

A Case Study Of Space In The Lost World Of Mitchell And Kenyon Part 1 (1897 1911)

2467 words - 10 pages .), New York: McGraw-Hill. Bottomore, S, ‘From the Factory Gate to the ‘Home Talent” Drama: An International Overview of Local Films in the Silent Era’ in Toulmin, V, Popple, S and Russell, P (eds), (2004), Lost World of Mitchell and Kenyon, Edwardian Britain on Film, Trowbridge: British Film Institute. Branston, G, (2000), Cinema and Cultural Modernity, Maidenhead, Open University Press. Gunning, T, (1998), ‘Early American Film.’ in, Hill, J

Abortion: The Case Of Rove V. Wade

1180 words - 5 pages It’s been a major social issue since the 1970’s and the case of Roe v. Wade. Over the years, abortion has been argued from both standpoints, for the unborn babies and against the denying of women’s rights to control their own bodies. Though some say it should be legal, the act of abortion should be illegal because the process can be considered murder, people take advantage of the option and abuse the system, and it can be a health risk to a

The Landmark Case Of Marbury V. Madison.

590 words - 2 pages The decision in this case took two weeks to decide weather Marbury was allowed to receive commission from Madison. It was a unanimous decision of 4-0.The chief justice finally decided that Marbury had a legal right to receive the commission. However, when Marbury requested for a court to order Madison to deliver his commission it was rejected. The reason for this is the Judiciary Act of 1789, which states that if the Supreme Court issues a writ