This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The International Criminal Court (Icc) And The Protection Of Human Rights In Africa

1589 words - 6 pages

2 Introduction
This essay will discuss the successes and challenges faced by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in prosecuting human rights violations cases in Africa. The ICC has been recently put under the spotlight by the African Union when it called for non-cooperation by its member states not to comply with the warrant of arrests that had been issued by the ICC against some of the leaders in Africa. This has created difficulties when it comes to prosecution of international crimes. The Court is also facing allegations of being Anti African. This mini dissertation will further look at some of the major cases that have been prosecuted in the ICC against African leaders. Furthermore, this mini dissertation will examine the obligations of states to cooperate with the ICC and the issue of state immunity from prosecution. The African Union has accused the ICC of targeting African leaders and for being inconsistent with how the ICC deals with alleged human rights violations.
2.1 Problem Statement
The non-cooperation and non-compliance of African state parties to arrest and hand over accused individuals to the ICC.
2.2 Aims/ objectives of the study
This mini dissertation aims to assess the effectiveness of the ICC in prosecuting African leaders who have alleged to have committed international crimes. It also aims to analyse the emerging role played by the International Criminal Court in Africa when it comes to prosecuting crimes in the continent. This mini dissertation will examine the successes and challenges that have been encountered by the ICC in prosecuting crimes since 2002. It will also assess the jurisdictional powers of the ICC in successfully prosecuting these crimes, analysing immunity of state officials in the prosecution of international crimes and commenting on the accusations levelled against the Court.
3 Background of the study
The International Criminal Court was created by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The Rome Statute came into operation in July 2002. It is governed by the Rome Statute as the first permanent international court which is treaty based. Up to date, out of 122 state parties to the Rome Statute, 34 of them are African states. Article 1of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court states that the ICC has the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of international concern. The functions and powers of the ICC to prosecute come into play when state parties cannot or are unwilling to prosecute accused persons. The ICC has jurisdiction only in relation to crimes that were committed after its inception in 2002. Article 13 provides for the ICC’s exercise of jurisdiction which includes the following: a state party referring a situation to the prosecutor, referral of a situation by the Security Council, and where the prosecutor initiates an investigation on his own initiative.
This mini dissertation seeks to analyse the...

Find Another Essay On The International Criminal Court (ICC) and the Protection of Human Rights in Africa

The Effects of the Purposed International Criminal Court

1318 words - 5 pages Rome, 160 nations decided to establish a permanent Inter-national Criminal Court to try individuals for the most serious offences of global concern, such as genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Many feel the agreement is no less important than the adoption of the United Nations Charter itself and it was hailed by United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan as "a giant step forward in the march towards universal human rights and the rule

An essay on the International Criminal Court, with a mark of 18.75/20. Including- Overview, History, Jurisdiction, Structure, Rights of the accused and Current Cases

1026 words - 4 pages,M1

Human Rights in Africa

2198 words - 9 pages HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT IN AFRICA Introduction The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is an international document that states some basic rights and necessary or fundamental freedoms for every human beings. (Universal Declaration of Human Rights) It was created by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10th December 1948. (The Foundation of the Human Rights law)It is made up of thirty articles which apply to everyone and this is

The History and Obstacles of Facing International Human Rights Proliferation

1860 words - 7 pages Many of us in Western society take for granted the freedoms that we enjoy on a daily basis. Freedoms such as speech, religion, and protection against political violence are guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. Unfortunately, in many parts of the world there are no such promises and people are subject to violence and suppression daily. This is where the need for an international structure of the basic rights of human beings comes into play, however

The United States Lends Credibility to the International Criminal Court

1683 words - 7 pages violations of human rights. The objections presented to America’s union with the International Criminal Court, including sovereignty and the protection of American citizens, are worth consideration; however, in order to bring legitimacy to the Court and be a factor in protecting human rights globally, the United States should join forces with the International Criminal Court. As a global court, the ICC’s main goal is to protect the rights of those

Have the courts struck a balance between the protection of individual rights under The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary sovereignty?

2052 words - 8 pages legislation.My conclusion would be that the judges have played a mixed role in relation to the protection of human rights. Although they are given the power to interpret legislation under s.3, and to pass declarations of incompatibility under s.4, these powers have little legal consequence, as the main consequences are political. Also, any decision made by the courts will not invalidate legislation, and the court may still be forced to apply the

The United States Lends Credibility to the International Criminal Court

1607 words - 6 pages represent the most extreme and atrocious violations of human rights. The objections presented to America’s union with the International Criminal Court, including sovereignty and the protection of American citizens, are worth consideration; however, in order to bring legitimacy to the Court and be a factor in protecting human rights globally, the United States should join forces with the ICC. As a global court, the ICC’s main goal is to protect the

International Criminal Court

3688 words - 15 pages The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a relatively new organization; only just a decade old and it has seen a great deal of hardships and success. Since the creation of ICC it has seen a vast deal of criticisms that “[range] from concerns about racism and neocolonialism” and so forth. Not only has it encountered criticisms, but as well, people have questioned the usefulness of this organization? In truth, is it necessary to question the

International Criminal Court

1779 words - 7 pages community has witnessed of a variety of criminal tribunals that were meant to promote peace-making and political transition in situations of gross violations of human rights and armed conflict among ethnical or religious groups. This tendency led to the establishment by the UN of two ad hoc Tribunals-for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda-and of the International Criminal Court (ICC). There was also a proliferation of

Criminal Justice/ DIscuss the Bill of rights and their court cases and how they are applied today

726 words - 3 pages America is widely recognized for the freedoms and equalities it gives its people. These equalities also extend to criminals and convicted felons. Under the Bill of Rights all Americans are entitled to certain rights and liberties, with this concept in mind the Supreme Court has interpreted many of these rights and liberties to protect the human rights of suspected criminals. During the 1950's and 1960's, one of the most pressing questions was

Subject: Negotiations Title: The US Opposition to the Establishment of International Criminal Court

2345 words - 9 pages US opposition to it. In particular, this paper will talk about the background information, discuss the interests of the US, which will explain their position regarding the Court and not ratifying the Statute, the approach America used in the process of negotiation, intra-party negotiation and how it influenced the country's position.BackgroundLooking at the history helps to understand that the establishment of the International Criminal Court

Similar Essays

The United States And The International Criminal Court (Icc)

4664 words - 19 pages and sign the Rome Statute. Introduction to the ICC “In the prospect of an international criminal court lies the promise of universal justice. That is the simple and soaring hope of this vision. We are close to its realization. We will do our part to see it through till the end. We ask do yours in our struggle to ensure that no ruler, no State, no junta and no army anywhere can abuse human rights with impunity. Only then will the

Can The European Court Of Human Rights Continue To Play A Meaningful Role In The Protection And Development Of Human Rights Across The Full Range

2414 words - 10 pages Challenges facing the European Court of Human Rights’. In Martinico Giuseppe & Oreste Pollicino (eds.) The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws. A Constitutional Comparative Perspective, Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, pp. 27-53. Helfer, Laurence (2008) ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’. The European Journal of International Law, 19, 1, pp

The Effectiveness Of The International Criminal Court

2978 words - 12 pages There is a close relationship between human rights and criminal law. The scope of my paper will surround human rights and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in addition to human rights and international crimes. International criminal justice in this context speaks to those interested in prosecuting against the background of international human rights and humanitarian norms. The use of criminal law has many positive effects and pursues many

Overview Of The International Criminal Court

2602 words - 10 pages Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) is the permanent court made for the main purpose of dealing with criminal acts committed by individuals amongst a state in a bit to tamper with the territorial integrity of the state. The ICC has prosecuted altogether … cases; of which are war crimes, - are crimes against humanity, - concern crimes of aggression and – (few) were prosecuted for genocide. Dividing the essay into the four main