This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Jury Selection Procedure In The English Legal System

1718 words - 7 pages

The Jury Selection Procedure in the English Legal System The theory behind modern day trial by jury can be traced back some
eight hundred years, to the sixty-three clauses of the Magna Carta
(1215). One of these clauses reads; “ No free man shall be arrested,
or imprisoned, or deprived of his property, or outlawed, or exiled, or
in any way destroyed, nor shall we go against him or send him against,
unless by legal judgement of his peers, or by the law of the land.”
The Magna Carta gave English nobles and freemen the right to trial
via a panel of their peers. In addition, the concept could also have
stemmed from Normandy (pre 1066) when a panel of adjudicators was
customary to decide land disputes. Many ancient cultures, such as the
Ancient Judea, had similar philosophies. The independence of the jury
from the judge was established in Bushell’s case (1670). A judge’s
role is ‘master of law’. He is responsible for interpreting the law in
the case, enforcing the law, deciding the sentence and passing it,
guiding the jury and avoiding bias at all costs. Whereas, the jury is
‘master of fact’ and is the sole decider of innocence or guilt. A
judge is forbidden from participating in the decision-making
process.

In part A of this essay, I will describe the jury selection procedure
as it stands in the English Legal System. In part B, I will consider
alternatives, suggest improvements to jury selection procedure, and
discuss how representative it is of English society.

PART A

The method of jury selection in the English legal system is for a
computer to arbitrarily pick individuals from the electoral rolls for
the locality of the court. Around 450,000 people are randomly selected
every year to partake in jury duty. Anyone one can be chosen, as long
as they meet the criteria specified, this being that you have to be a
registered voter between the ages of eighteen and seventy and that you
have lived in the UK for at least five consecutive years since the age
of thirteen. Although only twelve jurors are required, it is necessary
to choose a lot more people than needed due to the following
exclusions for eligibility:

Ineligible

* Persons suffering from a mental disorder.

* Members of judiciary or others concerned with the administration
of justice.

* The Clergy.

Disqualified

* People with certain criminal convictions.

* Those currently on bail in criminal proceedings.

Excused as of right

· Anyone aged sixty-five to seventy years old.

· Anyone who has already partaken in jury service in the last two
years.

· Members of Parliament.

· The medical professions.

· The armed forces.

· Practising members of a religious society.

...

Find Another Essay On The Jury Selection Procedure in the English Legal System

Criminal and Civil Law in the English Legal System

1893 words - 8 pages awarded against the loser (unlike in the full court). Legal representation is discouraged in this way. An 'integrated' theory of the civil justice system encompasses not merely formal legal rules and state courts, but also the numerous others kinds of dispute resolution mechanisms which exist to resolve civil disputes.

Explain the term " Constitutional Reform" in the context of the English legal system

1050 words - 4 pages proposing constitutional reform of some form or another (see appendix 2). This now leads me to explain how the constitutional reforms implemented by the government are affecting the British legal system.Secondly I would identify two main areas of where I believe constitutional reform to be having the greatest impact on the British legal system. This will allow me to show "Constitutional Reform" in the context of the English legal system. These areas

Law Essay: The Judiciary of the English Legal system

861 words - 3 pages are appointed by the queen with guidance from the Prime minister, the Lord Chancellor is still very influential.Under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 the qualifications for varies judicial posts in the English legal system are contained. Furthermore, to become a judge at any level in the English legal system it is necessary to have qualified as a barrister or solicitor, whereas before the courts and legal services act 1990 there was a

The Impact of Formalising Plea Bargaining on Justice and Equality in the English Legal System

4139 words - 17 pages The Impact of Formalising Plea Bargaining on Justice and Equality in the English Legal System Before discussing plea bargaining it is perhaps paramount to define what is meant by the expression. Plea bargaining refers to ‘the exchange of a guilty plea for a reduced charge or some hope of a reduced sentence.’[1] In other words it is an agreement between the prosecution and the defence by which the accused changes his plea

Overview of the Process of Law Reform in the English Legal System

2408 words - 10 pages The intention of this essay is to explain the process of law reform within the English legal system. The way in which the activity of parliament and that of the judiciary affects the way in which laws are reformed in the UK will be also discussed. The common law system in the UK means that the UK's primary legal principles have been developed by the judiciary rather than by parliament. However, as parliamentary sovereignty is an important

The English Legal System is based on the age-old system of precedent, which can be strict and inflexible

1415 words - 6 pages may need them. The court structure allows for control and organisation within the English legal system. Without the court, hierarchy there would be a decline in certainty and control. The civil court structure is as follows:Ratio decidendi and obiter dictum are two important features of precedent, which are taken into consideration when a judge has to make a decision in court. The ratio decidendi of a case is the principle of law on which the

A Dilemma of the Jury Selection Process?

1875 words - 8 pages a result of this research, lawyers understand what types of jurors are preferable and will strike down those unfavorable prospective jurors in a stereotypical manner. Thus, juries might not be representative and competent enough to reflect what the society believes, since lawyers interfere with the legal system and undermine the integrity if the result (Adams 715).The jury selections process is designed to help to select jury. However, the

The Jury System and Democracy

1115 words - 5 pages , which is very effective for a verdict. At the jury trial it is difficult for judge to do any corrupt, so the case does not go the wrong way. Any prejudice of one juror, which is wrong will be canceled out by the others and it is fair enough. The jury system is a very important institution in the United Kingdom and a fundamental part in the English legal system. It is the best example of participatory democracy. It is the only time, that ordinary

Advantages of Jury Trials in the Canadian justice system

2082 words - 8 pages This essay looks at the advantages of trials by juries in the Canadian justice system.I wrote this, while in Grade 10, for my OAC Law cource ISP project. It is a good essay, as I spent a lot of my time researching and planning for the essay..."Trial by jury" is very beneficial in Canada, providing exceptionally fair and just trials. Canada, as a democratic society needs these trials for a number of reasons. Firstly, the jury selection process

Justice in the Legal System

668 words - 3 pages Justice in the Legal System Justice, as defined by Webster’s Dictionary is the quality of being fair or just. This implies that justice would have something to do with being fair. I thought that if one of the things the law and legal system are about is maintaining and promoting justice and a sense of fairness, they might not be doing such a great job. An eye for an eye is fair? No, that would be too easy, too black and white. I could

The Selection and Role of a Jury in a Criminal Trial

946 words - 4 pages roll. The jury is made up of 12 people from all walks of life who have no legal qualifications, jurors play a vital part in the legal system. To qualify for jury service you must be between the ages of 18-70 years old, though if you are between the ages of 65-70 years old then you can refuse. Potential jurors must also have been resident for 5 years in the UKby the time they reach 18 years of age. Certain people are

Similar Essays

The English Legal System Essay

2075 words - 9 pages The English legal system is complex and there are many ways in which it can be influenced, this essay will explore some of the different, more obvious ways the law can be changed and what this shows in relation to the quote above. First the essay will discuss the different ways the law can be created and changed and who enables and controls those changes, with my primary examples being the common law and legislation for the judicracy and

The English Legal System Essay

1443 words - 6 pages The English Legal System The English legal system comprises of two different branches, barristers and solicitors. In the UK at the moment there are around 9,000 barristers and they are known collectively as the 'Bar'. The governing body for barristers is the Bar Council, which acts as a kind of trade union, safe guarding the interests of barristers and regulating barristers training and activities. All barristers

Discuss Whether Trial By Jury Should Be Abolished In The English Legal System? Critically Analyse The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The System

2010 words - 8 pages Jury selection is laid down in the Juries Act 1994. While it is proven that there are reasonable alternatives to a jury trial and that there is no doubt that jury trial is both time consuming and expensive when compared with trial by magistrates or by a judge alone, however the right to a jury trial shall not be dismissed so lightly. The anti jury lobby deems the jury system unpopular the importance of which is considered only overrated. I will

Juries In The English Legal System

1142 words - 5 pages Juries in the English Legal System Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment. When used in cases they have to decide weather the claimant has successfully proved his or her claim, they also decide the amount of money that is awarded in damages, this differs from the criminal court, where the only decision is whether the defendant is guilty or not. Jury