This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Justice Of Private Property: Analysis Of Locke, Smith And Marx

2044 words - 8 pages

The Justice of Private Property:
analysis of Locke, Smith, and Marx

Robert Trujillo

Mount Vernon Nazarene University
Social Justice
Dr. Lincoln Stevens

Private property and in a sense distribution of wealth have been key topics of social justice debate for centuries. John Locke, Adam Smith, and Karl Marx had differing and sometimes overlapping ideologies when it comes to property acquisition, economics, and property ownership. I assert though, that though it has not be put into practice in way matching the theory, Marx had the greatest ideas towards the creation and sustainment of harmony between men in his economic theory.
Probably some of Locke's greatest contributions were his ideas regarding property. In the time of Locke it was believed that the Bible declared the earth was made for humanity in common. Locke argued that though the earth is for all people, this does not imply one giant communal use but instead permits the acquisition of private property. Locke believed that God, being the creator had control over creation in the sense that he could work to create and manipulate/own/improve creation. Since we are made in the image of God we share (to a lesser extent) that power. Even though creation was possibly made for the common in the beginning we as humans inherently own our bodies. This ownership of our bodies includes our actions/works. This is similar with Marxist thought regarding the interrelationship between man, labor, and products we create. 1)"Whatsoever then he removes out of the state of nature… he hath mixed his labour with, and joined it with something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property." Assuming we do truly own our work/efforts, Locke believed that when we applied our work (ourselves) to the rest of creation, we in a way put ourselves into creation and more or less made creation a part of us therefore owned whatever we had work to improve/subdue. This is a simple break down of his acquisition of property theory. For Locke, any individual who put work into
1) John Locke, "Second treatise of government". Raleigh, N.C.: Alex Catalogue, 1776

(unowned) land justly acquired it. Locke seemed to believe one can also acquire property through the work of others if the person somehow submits to or benefits from the original owner. This opens Locke's theory to being a pro-capitalist theory. For example if a man has a servant, his servants work becomes his property. When the servant harvests crops out of the masters property, even if to sustain themselves, there is a gain in property fort he master. Arguably an individual can work as hard as they want and therefore acquire as much (if not all) the land there is as well as gain as many people for whom will acquire more property in his/her name. There were a couple of stipulations though to combat the possibility of a single person or few people owning all property.

Locke said that act of acquisition, an individual must only...

Find Another Essay On The Justice of Private Property: Analysis of Locke, Smith and Marx

How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

7443 words - 30 pages Locke says that the state has a responsibility to preserve people's private property. He (1688) says "The great and chief end, therefore, of men's uniting into common-wealths, and putting themselves under government, is the preservation of their property" (p. 262). The state has to set laws which establish the rights of the people to own property. It has to have judges to decide between disputes. And it has to have people to execute the law once

A Comparison of the Economic Philosophies of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx

1811 words - 7 pages the entire summation of the Communists theory can be described in a single sentence, being the Abolition of private property. A society where accumulation of capital would not take place, but the wide spread nature of capital throughout. Marx take on education is that of a social structure, where public schools are constructed and lecturing influence of the ruling class is obsolete. Through communism, religious beliefs would be abolished, along

A Comparison of the Economic Theories of Adam Smith and Karl Marx

2467 words - 10 pages There is perhaps not a more famous ongoing dialectic argument in the field of political economy than the one between Adam Smith and Karl Marx in regards to capitalism. The two thinkers, although coming to radically different conclusions about the outcomes of the capitalist system for all parties involved, agree on a surprising number of ideas such as labor being the source of commodities’ value, as well as the fact that the division of labor

Viewpoints of Durkhiem, Karl Marx, and Adam Smith

790 words - 4 pages keeps the classes where they are. People cannot rise the through the class system. The division of labor is a way of “social control” of the status hierarchy. ADAM SMITH: Adam smith is a good medium of Durkheim and Marx. Adam understood that for a nation, productivity is everything. A lot of productivity occurring within a nation correlates to a lot happening in it. Things are being made and sold because things are needed for different things

Economis Theorists- Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes and their contributions to the field of economics

597 words - 2 pages Throughout the centuries, there have been many economists, who have contributed to the many economic theories. Among them is Adam Smith, also known as the Father of Capitalism. His theory on beneficial workings of the free marketplace and his 1776 Wealth of Nations is what he is most noted for. Karl Marx, the Father of Communism, is most famous for his theory on the conflict within capitalism. There is also John Maynard Keynes, who is known as

Analysis of Karl Marx and Communism

2142 words - 9 pages hasto consume for himself because his "product and labor are estranged"from him. Marx says that because the work of the laborer is takenaway and does not belong to the laborer, the laborer loses his"rightful existence" and is made alien to himself. Private propertybecomes a product and cause of "alienated labor" and through that,causes disharmony. "Alienated labor is seen as the consequence ofmarket product, the division of labor, and the division of

The Effect that Private Property Has on the Actions of Individuals Part 2

1655 words - 7 pages Manchester pre Industrial Revolution compared to the extensive changes that the city underwent after private property and private business was introduced. The memoir gives a very realistic picture of the poor living conditions these inner city areas had. Death rates due to working related incidents and disease were much higher within these industrial cities than in the more rural parts of Manchester. Engels later partnered up with Karl Marx in the

The Effect that Private Property Has on the Actions of Individuals

1584 words - 7 pages Private property has been a crucial human right for hundreds of years and has been very influential on the actions of individuals. Private property is having the right to have complete jurisdiction over obtained goods or resources; however, private property usually refers to land owned by a single individual or to a group of individuals. Because private property is controlled by a private owner, one is able to use the product or land to its

Marx And The Historic Evolution Of Communism

1016 words - 5 pages expressing Socialist (pre-communist like) ideas was Plato's "Republic" in which he outlined a Society run by philosophers and enforced/aided by warriors. Emphasis was put on the perfect state, not the perfect person, although that was to be the eventual outcome. There was to be no private property and children were merely to be born of license from the state. Rulers would be treated and paid equally, but more successful ones would be 'rewarded

Karl Marx and the Authorship of communism

3229 words - 13 pages nature, the lever of fear or of self-interest must be employed. Marx defined inequality between the classes as the cause of social conflict where as for Weber class was only one form of social stratification. To counter this stratification, and allow societies to progress from capitalism to socialism an impartial third person, the State, must be started. The State would abolish private property removing the basis of class conflict. Marx equates

Private Property Concepts in the Bible and in Historic Context

1499 words - 6 pages , premature death, enslavement to capital and renewed competition even in the state of society that is most favorable to them. (Marx, 1844) The hardship of living and increasing anger against capitals resulted in workers’ uprisings where The Great Charter Movement is the representative. The deeper reason behind it is the unfair distribution of property regarding to the whole society where capitals were placed at an advantageous position with gathering

Similar Essays

Locke Vs. Marx: Views On Property Rights

1832 words - 7 pages John Locke and Karl Marx, two of the most renowned political philosophers, had many contrasting views when it came the field of political philosophy. Most notably, private property rights ranked high among the plethora of disparities between these two individuals. The main issue at hand was whether or not private property was a natural right. Locke firmly believed that private property was an inherent right, whereas Marx argued otherwise. This

Rousseau: On The Importance Of Private Property And Private Interests

1488 words - 6 pages In a society based on private property, a conflict arises between private economic interests and the general interest of the society. For this to be minimized in favor of the general will, Rousseau advocated a return to simple society based on a primitive economy. In his critiques on civil society, Rousseau identifies the division of labor, private property and exchange as the central causes of moral and political corruption in that society

Analysis Of The Industrial Revolution With Comparisons Of Various "Fathers" Of The Modern Industrial Machine Such As: John Locke, Karl Marx And Robert Owens

2707 words - 11 pages dominated economy to a more industrial based society.The industrial revolution took place throughout Europe in very different times and in very different ways. Many great thinkers contributed to the industrial revolution, Adam Smith, though alive for only the very beginning of the period, was a huge contributor to its concepts and ideals. There were many critics of the revolution as well. Karl Marx is perhaps one of the most well known and

Compare And Contrast The Philosophies Of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, And Karl Marx

772 words - 3 pages In the idea of human nature; origin of state, the nature of government, the rights of regulation can be drawn as the reflection of insightful philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx. By understanding this within the context of human nature, we can see their ideas play to how they perceive a modern philosophy. Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto illustrates the desire to build "a society without economic classes". John Locke's