The Justice Of The Death Penalty

953 words - 4 pages

The Justice of the Death Penalty

Whenever the word "death penalty" comes up, extremists from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says deterrence, the other side says there's a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. Personally I think it is time for Americans to take a stand use the justice system as it was intended, for the punishment of criminals.
A big point of argument for the people against the death penalty is the accidental execution of an innocent person.(Royco, 370) Before deciding, one must remember the lives that the death penalty saves. Repeat murderers are eliminated, and potential murderers are deterred. One must consider the victims as well as the defendant. Is it worth it to lose forty-five innocent lives so that no innocent person is executed. Wesley Lowe states the matter best when he says, "As for the penal system accidentally executing an innocent person, I must point out that in this imperfect world, citizens are required to take certain risks in exchange for relative safety." We risk dying on the highway in a car accident for the convenience of using a car. This practice is considered acceptable. Risking the possibility that someone might be wrongly executed is worth it to save the lives of thousands of innocent people who might be the next victims of murder. One US Senate report stated this position this way: All that can be expected of...[human authorities] is that they take every reasonable precaution against the danger of error... If errors are...made, this is the necessary price that must be paid within a society which is made up of human beings.
Many persons against the death penalty say there are alternative forms of punishment, such as a life sentence. The problem with this is that no prison is 100% safe and criminals do find ways to escape or some are even paroled. This allows repeat offenders to be back out on the street and gives them the chance to kill again. Dawud Mu'Min who was serving a 48-year sentence for the 1973 murder of a cab driver when he escaped a road work gang and stabbed to death a storekeeper named Gadys Nopwasky in a 1988 robbery that netted $4.00. This could have all be prevented if he was executed.
Abolitionists claim that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent when it comes to crime. (Schwarzchild, 655) They say that the states with the death penalty have a higher rate of crime. The problem with this is that every state is different, each state has a different ethnic groups that make up the population,...

Find Another Essay On The Justice of the Death Penalty

Capital Punishment Essay: Death Penalty Maintains Justice

1213 words - 5 pages Death Penalty Maintains Justice It is no triumph that death sentences are routinely carried out, or even that such a device is necessary within our society. Yet the fact remains that society does require a death penalty, and to believe that the topic is one-sided or easily answered would be a fatal mistake. It is best to note the absolutes of the death penalty - first, that once it is carried out, there is no reversing the outcome. It

Arguments of the death penalty Essay

567 words - 2 pages Is death the justification of a murder or are we merely subduing ourselves by performing the same heinous act? This argument had been debated for many decades and although some feel that death is the answer to a murder, there are others that find it completely barbaric. Through a careful analysis between Edward Koch's "Death and Justice" and David Bruck's "The Death Penalty", I believe Koch had the better argument in claiming that death is the

Cost of the Death Penalty

1185 words - 5 pages people see their own government put people to death, the more likely they will be to use death in their own world. Also, he believes the evidence shows those who currently support the death penalty would favor other types of alternatives if given the option and explanation. Largely he believes people want justice and choose the death penalty due to a lack of any other sure way to keep the dangerous criminals off the street. Costanzo suggests workable

Flaws of the Death Penalty

973 words - 4 pages Flaws of the Death Penalty Capital Punishment has been part of the criminal justice system since as far back as 1700 B.C. However, in recent times opponents have shown the death penalty to be racist, barbaric, and in violation with the United States Constitution as "...cruel and unusual punishment." In this country, although laws governing the application of the death penalty have undergone many changes since biblical times, the punishment

Constitutionality of the Death Penalty

1792 words - 8 pages of the national police and our nation is constantly being viewed and examined. The death penalty was designed to give justice where justice is due but more importantly it is a huge deterrent for people who might think about committing a crime of extreme seriousness, letting no one forget that with extreme action comes extreme due consequence. What is wrong with consequence? Growing up on a farm my family had a large number of animals of

Abolition of The Death Penalty

1039 words - 4 pages which bars cruel and unusual punishments (Singh, 2003). There is no constitutional amendment that gives state or federal governments the authority to proclaim death as a penalty. This is an assumption based on the methods of punishment used in the era of the first colonies. The archaic “eye for an eye”, “Annie get your gun” justice has regressed into a self-justifying realm of indecision where it is easier continue in conventional tradition. We

Abolishment of the Death Penalty

2800 words - 12 pages steadily moved to more humane methods of carrying out capital punishment” (Baze v. Rees, 2008). This is the opinion of the Chief Justice, John G. Roberts, who has a powerful voice in this argument, primarily because if the death penalty is abolished it must ultimately go through the Supreme Court. Another major goal of the death penalty is to provide the victims’ families with some sort of closure, “Society is justly ordered when each person receives

The Death Penalty - Overview of the death penalty including history.

589 words - 2 pages The Death PenaltyThe first known execution in the United States of America was of Daniel Frank, put to death in 1622 in the Colony of Virginia for the crime of theft. Since then the death penalty has almost always been a feature of the criminal justice system, first in the American colonies and then, after independence, in the U.S.Legal challenges to the death penalty culminated in a 5 to 4 U.S. Supreme Court decision Furman v. Georgia in 1972

Benefits of the Death Penalty

1554 words - 6 pages Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of

Support of the Death Penalty

705 words - 3 pages I do support the death penalty and I do not consider it cruel or unusual treatment. The Constitution itself indicates that the death penalty can be used. Amendment V of the Constitution states that “…no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law….” (U.S. Const., amend V). In other words, once a person has gone through the due process of law, his life can be taken if he is found guilty. There is a

The Cons of the Death Penalty

565 words - 2 pages The Cons of the Death Penalty “…Over 600 people were falsely convicted and 35 faced death for crimes that they did not commit…”(Johnson). The death penalty is an ineffective and expensive way of dealing justice to the American people. It is easier and cheaper to send someone to prison for life than to have them face the death penalty and be executed. Capital punishment is an unnecessary punishment because criminals are already managed at

Similar Essays

Criminal Justice System And The Death Penalty

2334 words - 9 pages ”( The foundation of the criminal justice system is certainly a profound and interesting topic to discuss and debate. In the American criminal justice system, cases of the most severe and heinous nature can be sentenced to the death penalty when appropriate. “The death penalty is a punishment by execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime” (Farlex). “In most American states, capital crime offenses consist of

Capital Punishment Essay True Justice Through Application Of The Death Penalty

1104 words - 4 pages True Justice Through Application of the Death Penalty       The death penalty, as administered by states based on their individual laws, is considered capital punishment, the purpose of which is to penalize criminals convicted of murder or other heinous crimes (Fabian).  The death penalty issue has been the focus of much controversy in recent years, even though capital punishment has been a part of our country's history since the beginning

Unlawful Justice; It Is About The Death Penalty And How It Is Wrong.

978 words - 4 pages penalty has some major mess-ups. Nobody is going to be able to correct those fullyand the only way to stop the mess-ups is to abolish the death penalty. Many innocent people are killed and a lot of jurors are racist and judge the crime poorly. Almost half of the countries in the world have abolished it why shouldn't we.What if you were wrongly accused of committing a crime and were put to death would justice have been served I think not. Do you

Injustices Of The Justice System. Why Do Wrongful Convictions Of The Death Penalty Occur? This Research Paper Describes Many Reasons For Why Wrongful Convictions Occur.

997 words - 4 pages measure. A book written by Michael Radelet, "In Spite of Innocence," gives 415 cases of murder trials that ended in death were actually proven to be wrongful convictions ( Two scholars, James McCloskey and David Rudovskey, give a little more insight in which they truly believe that ten percent of everyone convicted are innocent.Most convictions are handled without a trial because the evidence to convict