The League Of Nations Was A Success.

551 words - 2 pages

The League of Nations managed to keep a lot of items going and introduced co-operation between countries in the 1920'sIn my opinion the League of Nations was a success I will discuss my reasons in this essay.The aims of the League of Nations were to discourage aggression, to encourage co-operation, disarmament and to improve working conditions for everyone in the world.The League of Nations was set up because after the First World War everyone wanted to avoid war happening again, they all agreed that an organisation which could sort every countries problems out would be a good idea. Countries looked to the league to bring stability.The first problem I am to discuss is the fact that the strongest country America wasn't in the league which is a shock considering it was the president of that country came up with the idea of the league! One major problem in America was that they didn't want to get dragged into everyone else's war like they had in the First World War. The remaining strongest countries left in the league were Britain, France, Italy and Japan. Another problem arose. Britain and France had been weakened from the 1st world war and were not the countries they once used to be. Most countries thought that America were going to join, but they didn't leaving people shocked. They felt that America would keep it together.Another problem that the league often had to face was border disputes where countries would send troops into their neighbouring country and try to take it over. It was especially hard when they had to settle a problem...

Find Another Essay On The league of nations was a success.

To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920's?

646 words - 3 pages Greek invaded Bulgaria as a reply to the murdering of Greek people. The League interfered and Greece became angry about their decision, reminding them of the incident between Italy and Greece in 1923, where Italy attacked them and Greece had to pay Italy for that and apologize. Those three incidents in the 1920's made the League a successful organization.An action which showed the success of the League of Nations was the establishment of

How successful was the league of nations in the 1920's? This essay analyses the problems and difficulties of the first attempt of a world security organization

743 words - 3 pages How successful was the league in the 1920's?The League of Nations main aim was in: "stopping wars, improving people's lives and jobs, in encouraging disarmament and in enforcing the decisions made in the peace Treaty of Versailles."If we consider the above statement to judge the successes of the league, we may say that when the League was called to settle a quarrel in the 1920s, it has always been quite successful.The most important successes

Which was more important as a reason for the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's? The absence of the USA or Britain and France's self interest

574 words - 2 pages The failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's was due to two main reasons.Firstly, the absence of the USA. The League of Nations was thought up by the American president Woodrow Wilson it was one of his 14 points. He had come up with the idea, the League was in a sense his child, yet he was allowed no part in it. The American congress had refused to become members of The League and this caused all sorts of problems. America had the biggest

The League of Nations.

1292 words - 5 pages The League of Nations was created during the conference in Versailles, France, 1919, when Woodrow Wilson, the president of United States came up with fourteen points. The League of Nations was a point of Woodrow Wilson's fourteen points. It was created to stop wars by working out the problems with each other, to improve the world, to get rid of weapons, and to enforce the Treaty of Versailles. The League of Nations wasn't welcomed in the United

The League of Nations

1569 words - 6 pages The League of Nations was set up by Woodrow Wilson and his 14 points, countries around the world decided to join while others didn't for there reasons. Other countries did join but were doing things for example, Italy invading Abyssinia and the L of N knew about it, but failed to do anything about it. In my essay, there are a number of questions asked and I will be answering them with detail, explaining them and giving my own views on them. The

The League of Nations

680 words - 3 pages At The treaty of Versailles, Woodrow Wilson, president of the USA gave 14 points to settle world peace, even though some of his points were rejected, the most important one which consisted of creating a 'League of Nations' was accepted. The League was formed on 1920, the aims of the League where to maintain peace and security in the world by countries acting together to stop war, this was called collective security. Some of the world powers were

Assess the Significance of the League Nations

2139 words - 9 pages to be a success at first it was ultimately a failure. Henig would however argue against this, 'Despite the outbreak of the second world war, the allies in that war were determined to lay the foundations for a successor organization to the League which would help re-establish international harmony after the conclusion of the war.'[ HENIG,R (1973) The League of Nations, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, Page 161 ] This quote conveys an opposing

Ghost of the League of Nations.

593 words - 2 pages The League of Nations was created with the aim of linking up the world and making it a peaceful place, but there was a massive amount of problems that caused it to the road of failure, but why was is it doomed to fail?The primary factor that caused the League of Nations to fail was its leading countries. Thomas Woodrow Wilson, the president of America at the time was the one that brought up the idea of League of Nations, but they didn't even

League of Nations and United Nations.

945 words - 4 pages the UN to take its own actions, notably the Iraqi War. During the Korean War (1950 - 1953), the troops sent were mainly Americans and the commander was also an American, even though they were supposedly UN troops. The decisions made would then be more pro-American rather than pro-UN. Yes, the United States may be a superpower, but should it have so much influence over the UN?Another factor for the failure of the League of Nations was the self

The purpose and intent of the League of Nations - Essay

540 words - 2 pages Following the international disaster of world war one, there needed to be an organisation formed to prevent the chance of a war of that scale ever again. The League of Nations was designed primarily to prevent war and settle matters peacefully. The League also focused upon many humanitarian areas on an international level. Internationalism was a fundamental building block of the Leagues structure as well as a major aim of the organisation. Its

The successes and failures of the League of Nations

1562 words - 6 pages problems around the world.The League of Nations was successful in maintaining a temporary democratic structure in unstable areas, whilst organising a more permanent solution. This was seen in 1921 in the Upper Silesia (on the border between Germany and Poland) with people from both nationalities. The two countries both wanted control, and a vote was organized by the League. The population was divided, so the League partitioned areas and built

Similar Essays

Was The League Of Nations A Success Or A Failure?

3786 words - 15 pages helplessly watched it.Before 1920 there was no such thing as the League of Nations. So there fore starting it and running it the way it did was a huge success in its self. The league was successful in solving disputes between minor and less powerful countries in the 1920's. However, it was powerless in front of the major and powerful countries in the 1930's. The league was doomed to fail right from it creation. The League of Nations was not a league

How Strong Was The League Of Nations?

616 words - 2 pages The League of Nations was created from the Treaty of Versailles after WWI. However, unfortunately no countries were willing to create the League of Nations. They joined and created the League because Wilson, the president of one the strongest countries U.S, said he wanted to create a better world. So, the countries in the League seemed lacking of eagerness. How effective was the League of Nations, then?It was true that the League of Nations had

Assessment Of The Success Of The League Of Nations

1185 words - 5 pages the league condemned all members for trading with Italy. Although Britain and France undermined this decision. Eventually the emperor of Abyssinia fled to Geneva where he addressed the council and protested against the failure of the league, this marked the end of the leagues existence. In conclusion was the league a success at all? The league did have successes and would have had many more but the member nations

The League Of Nations A Success In The 20’s, A Failure In The 30’s. How Far Do You Agree With This Satement?

534 words - 2 pages 1920's the League Of Nations was a success in many areas. It kept peace between Finland and Sweden after an argument erupted over the Aland Islands in 1920, it rescued from Austria from a financial crisis in 1922 and the action they took stopped a war between Greece and Bulgaria in 1925.However during the 1920's the League also failed to maintain peace in some areas, an example of this is when the League could not agree on the action to take when