This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Main Properties Of The Cosmological Argument

1220 words - 5 pages

The Main Properties of the Cosmological Argument

The cosmological argument began with Plato and ever since been
defended and attacked by many great philosophers.
One of the supporters was Leibniz.
The cosmological argument is basically an argument about causation.
Its major supporter was Thomas Aquinas though Gotfried Leibniz also
put forward a simplified version of Aquinas's cosmological argument.
The major critics of the argument have included David Hume and
Bertrand Russell who question the basic principle that the argument
works from.

While the arguments of Aquinas assume that the universe cannot be
temporally infinite, there is a version of the cosmological argument
(supported by Leibniz (1646-1714) among others) that allows that the
universe is temporally infinite.
Leibniz regards the cosmological argument as a strong argument because
there has to be an explanation for life.

In 1710 Leibniz furthered Aquinas' third "way" (self existence) into
what he called the "Principle of Sufficient Reason". By 'Sufficient
Reason' he meant "complete explanation". He thinks it is logical that
there is a reason for existence.

Leibniz put forward a very simple and understandable version of the
cosmological argument, which states that there must be a reason, why
things exist because there must be a reason why anything happens and
why one thing happens rather than another. If something exists, it is
that something faced with the possibility of making it exist or not
making it exist chose to make it exist. Ultimately as things exist,
there must be a first-mover that itself was not caused to exist. This
first-mover is what we understand by God. As things exist, God must
exist.

Some great base must exist, he said, that was in itself the ultimate
reason, the ultimate "brute fact". Coppleston, in his famous debate
with Bertrand Russell, described Leibniz's logical end as a "necessary
being" or a "being, which must and cannot not exist".

However many major thinkers have rejected the cosmological argument
such as David Hume.
Hume states that it is illogical to think of God. God is just claimed
as an excuse because of the need for a first mover. God is just a name
to a process we can't define.
Hume is an empiricist (bases everything on experience).

Empiricists believe that if you can't see/ study something in this
world, you do not know it.
You cannot observe a universe starting, therefore we do not know about
it.
Hume also suggests that we are here, and that is that. Why do we need
an explanation anyway?
Hume asks why, if everything has a cause, must one thing not.

As does Bertrand Russell. Russell believes that the universe is 'just
a brute fact', and it does not matter how, we are just here!'

The universe is not an issue.

Perhaps the most important...

Find Another Essay On The Main Properties of the Cosmological Argument

The cosmological argument for the existence of God

1445 words - 6 pages argument relies on science. The kalam argument says that everything that exists must have a cause. But we have seen that that is no longer true. The theory of the big bang, that the universe started in a little point and then exploded and is getting bigger. Scientists are saying that the universe is getting bigger suggests that there was a starting point, which is the big bang. But the big bang is only a theory and hasn't been proven. One of the main strengths of the cosmological argument is that how could any thing come from nothing. If using the big bang theory, how did the big bang happen itself? I believe in 1 God but think that the weaknesses are stronger than the strengths.

The Cosmological Argument is Self-contradictory Essay

1160 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument, also known as the First Cause Argument, is one of the most important arguments for the existence of God, not only because it is one of the more convincing, but also because it is one of the most used. The thought that everything that happens must have a cause and that the first cause of everything must have been God, is widespread. The cosmological argument is the argument from the existence

Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1344 words - 5 pages Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The term cosmological comes from the Greek language, meaning ‘world’ or ‘universe.’ The argument is based on facts about the world. The topic of cosmology refers to the study of the universe. The cosmological argument begins with a general claim about the physical universe e.g. that some events have causes and that there must be a

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

940 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not logic so the outcome is probable or possible not definite. The argument is in three forms; motion, causation and being. These are also the first three ways in the

The Various Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

2389 words - 10 pages The Various Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument is a well established argument for the existence of God and it is also known as the first cause argument. The cosmological argument is based upon the belief that there is a first cause behind the existence of universe and this was God. It has taken many forms and in the past has been presented in many ways. So many

The Key Ideas of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1709 words - 7 pages point, which is the big bang. But the big bang is only a theory and hasn’t been proven. One of the main strengths of the cosmological argument is that how could any thing come from nothing. If using the big bang theory, how did the big bang happen itself? I believe in 1 God but think that the weaknesses are stronger than the strengths.

The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument

862 words - 3 pages The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument Aquinas’s argument was as follows: If the universe was infinite, it would have an infinite number of days. The end of an infinite series of days can never be reached, so today would never arrive. However, today has arrived, so the past cannot be infinite. Time began when the universe began, which was an event. Events are caused; therefore there must have

Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument

1402 words - 6 pages Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument Aquinas's 3rd way suggests that the world consists of contingent beings. As all contingent beings have a cause, namely another contingent being, there must have been a time when nothing existed, (unless contingent beings exist as a brute fact). Therefore, contingent beings could not have come into existence unless there is a necessary being which is non- contingent that caused

The Influence of Cosmological Thought

1623 words - 6 pages Cosmology is the universal observation of extra terrestrial cosmos that illustrate the meaning and origins of life. Cosmological thought defines the beliefs and practises in civilisations and is apparent in the reflection of social hierarchy and structure in many cultures. It can be described in anthropological thought as a cultural phenomenon that has been constructed by many ancient civilisations, depicted for thousands of years in ancient

The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas

1455 words - 6 pages one’s understanding of the nature of God. Anselm’s definition of God being “a supremely perfect being”, is the basis of his argument. God must be such a thing that cannot be thought not to exist if he is: “Than that which nothing greater can be conceived”. (Anslem) Descartes points out that if you imagine a triangle, one of its main properties is that it has three sides and three corners. These are the predicates

The Properties of Water

1103 words - 4 pages dissolve non polar substances because polar substance do not dissolve non polar substances (Water Education , n.d.). Now that cohesion has been discussed, adhesion comes in the picture. Adhesion is the property of sticking together (as of glue and wood) or the assembling of surfaces of diverse composition. The properties of adhesion exist because of the slightly positive hydrogen atoms and the negatively positive oxygen atom (Demand Media, Inc

Similar Essays

The Main Strengths Of The Cosmological Argument

871 words - 3 pages The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the existence of a non-contingent being. One of the main

The Cosmological Argument Essay

1863 words - 7 pages here if God did not exist. This point was actually argued by Aquinas' in his 'First Way'. One of the main issues with regard to the cosmological argument for the existence of God is what the role of God is after the world has been created? Certainly it can be argued that God could be the first cause (either as creation out-of-nothing ('ex nihilo' Genesis 1-2) or a form of theistic evolution (God as the cause of the

The Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

1298 words - 5 pages could a timeless cause give rise to a temporal effect? Moreover, the cause must transcend both matter and time to create matter and time. Finally, in order to create the universe ex nihilo, this cause must be enormously powerful, if not omnipotent. One is warranted in concluding that therefore, God exists. With that, I now turn it over to kohai for his opening argument. Works Cited 1. David S. Oderberg, "Traversal of the Infinite, the “Big Bang” and the Kalam Cosmological Argument", Philosophia Christi 4 (2002): 305-36 2. Alexander Pruss, "From the Grim Reaper Paradox to the Kalaam Argument" http://alexanderpruss.blogspot.com...

The Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

1245 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. Arguments like this are thought up to recognize why we and the universe exist. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically