The Morality of Abortion and Surrogacy
It is said that, the basic principle of such tradition is that humans communicate through symbols, which are a common currency through which a sense of self is created through interaction with others. Mead's theory neatly avoids the trap of positing a sense of self that is constructed entirely through symbols and society by making a distinction between two different selves: "I" which is the unsocialized self; the font of individual desires and needs, and "me," the socialized self, the self within society. (p. 184) Elliot rightly identifies the flaws of symbolic interactionism: namely, the obsession with rationalism and the wholesale disavowal of the emotional aspects of the self. The American sociologist Irving Goffman would seem to articulate a rather more fluid version of selfhood. Irving's self is constantly engaged in per formative space, routinely playing specific roles within particular scenes of social interaction. (2001) This conceptualization of self too is not without its flaws, for although Irving maintains that there is a self behind the masks, it is not this self but rather its per formative role-playing that appears to be analyzed in Irving's theory.
The mind is the ultimate resource and the only thing that is truly scarce in absolute terms. Abortion thus adversely affects society by both reducing the quantity of minds available and by exacerbating negative externalities. Thus, abortion is not in the public interest on account of both of these reasons and, therefore, it cannot be a just or genuinely beneficial public policy. (Germain, p. 275)
Theologians will argue that killing innocent human beings is moral turpitude since an irreplaceable soul is lost. However, abortion is also a huge social loss in an economic sense. Society loses minds and the ideas they would have, as well as the resources that are siphoned off in order to kill and process them. But the murdered lose the opportunity to live and enjoy life, and all that living entails. Also, many have to bear the pain of being burned to death by saline solution or chopped up into pieces by sharp instruments, and would hardly be consoled by the fact that their remains will go to benefit medical science or rent seekers. The key element is that an innocent life has been taken that might have developed into the next Einstein, Edison, Salk, Jefferson, or Beethoven. (1970)
Some believe that even though there may be life, or potential life, or however one wants to refer to the fetus, that by denying a woman the right to an abortion is denying her control of her body. Being a woman myself, I am obviously against people trying to control women or their bodies. But the fetus is a completely separate life from the woman. It has a completely different blood type and genetic code; it is not just part of the mother's body. It is temporarily residing there, and birth is just the...