The Natural Ways Of Locke, Hobbes, And Rousseau

1382 words - 6 pages

In today’s society, human nature is a commonly used term. On the other hand, there is not just one concept of human nature, but rather a plethora of concepts surrounding the idea. With the rise of capitalism, social structure is reformed; it is during this rise in the early seventeenth and eighteenth century, that John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau introduce their varying opinions surrounding man in nature. The western philosophers mainly concern themselves with the concept of the social contract. Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke begin with the conception of the individual, because in the natural state, they all believe that man is an independent character. Each of the philosophers used their revolutionary concepts to challenge power, yet their arguments differ dramatically.
Through their texts, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau portray Enlightenment ideals of their time period. The texts give historical importance and context, for a greater understanding of their environment. Hobbes and Locke write their ideals, as a rise of capitalism is occurring in England. Through their texts, the nation’s structural change as well as equality, freedom, human rights, and democratic rule are conceptualized. Similarly, Rousseau publishes his work on the dawn of the French Revolution, asserting some of the key issues facing his society. Yet to fully understand the concerns of their modern men, the political philosophers retreat to their view on man’s natural state.
Thomas Hobbes, the first of the philosophers to publish his work, had a special interest in the nature of man and society. Hobbes was a proponent of rational egoism, and believed that self-interest is acceptable in cases of great reason and capacity, because of this he portrays man as a relatively greedy character. In the natural state, man has an unrestricted freedom and there is absolute equality. However, he also portrays this setting as a war against all humanity, in which man is intended to fight. The setting lacks laws or authority, which leads to its inadequate protection, further emphasizing Hobbes’s idea of total independence. Anything goes in a society with no moral normalcies, because there is no standard of justice, good, or evil, yet Hobbes still makes mention of man feeling shame by nature. Without morals, Hobbes views the natural man as corrupt, “so that in nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory” (Hobbes 1615:5). The natural man according to Hobbes is insecure, instable, and lacks progress. These assumptions of man lead Hobbes to believe that humanity is in danger of extinction without rules or structure.
From this equality of ability ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of our ends. And therefore if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies; and in the way to their end (which is principally their own conservation, and sometimes their...

Find Another Essay On The Natural Ways of Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau

Comparing Locke´s Natural Law with Rousseau´s Discourse on Inequality

2831 words - 11 pages all, and the earth itself to nobody.” In this scenario, Rousseau describes the natural man, exploring what he calls the theodicy of self-love. According to Rousseau, the natural man is defined both by his love of the self, which is non-destructive, as well as his compassion for others; these things allow mankind to survive within nature. He believes that man is essentially little better than an animal; taking a dim view of Hobbes’ idea of the

Social contract in the view of Rousseau and Locke

1416 words - 6 pages exercise of restraint and rational judgment by the people. Locke also notes the family as the human organization which is most central for the development of virtue in a governmental association that both reveres and promotes natural freedom and balance. He also claimed that freedom is so essential to man's preservation that he cannot live without it.Jean Jacques Rousseau . . . A Contractual Agreement"Man is born free, yet everywhere he is in chains

The Ideas of Hobbes VS Locke

964 words - 4 pages Hobbes Vs. LockeNick CappyThomas Hobbes and John Locke were English philosophers who attended Oxford University. Hobbes was born in Westport, England and Locke was born in Wrington. These two philosophers became famous because of their ideas about politics and the understanding of human nature. Thomas Hobbes had a very negative view on human nature. He describes human nature as being constantly at war with one another. According to Hobbes

Hobbes and Locke: The Power Debate

1393 words - 6 pages Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were seventeenth century political philosophers whose different beliefs stemmed from the different contexts in which each man lived. Hobbes, an aristocrat who lived through the English civil war, had to flee England, watch his monarch’s execution, and observes the violence of human nature at its very worst. Given this experience, his central concern was the need for absolute power to maintain peace and prevent

The State of Nature and its Implications for Civilization in Hobbes and Rousseau

1648 words - 7 pages recognizes that there must be laws to assure the reciprocation of the surrendering of the violent rights of the state of nature, similar to the views of Hobbes. While Hobbes and Rousseau have different ideas about mankind, and the ways in which they may conduct themselves outside civilized society, both agree that their contemporary world is not a world of the human animal. Changes have occurred not only in the way humans are ordered, but in

Locke, Hobbes and the Good Life: The Proper Role and extent of Government

1792 words - 7 pages the good life. While both Hobbes and Locke provide the mere life for their subjects, only Locke allows for the attainment of the good life. A government that offers the mere life to its subjects only offers the protection from outside invasion and from other subjects. This is the initial intent of any civil society, simple protection. After the society is established the natural tendency is to provide for the good life, a life where

Political Philosophy: Locke and Rousseau

1584 words - 6 pages different ideas about the formation of government and development of society. Locke's and Rousseau's different thinking give us the two separate ways to think bout the development of society, the unit, power and system of the government. According to John Locke, the parliament power, common men are legitimate to subvert the parliamentarian; while on the other hand, Jean-Jacques Rousseau holds a belief that people do have the legislative power

Comparison of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

1269 words - 5 pages education and discipline that one would apply in the endless situations life provides. The opposing ideologies of human nature by Hobbes and Rousseau would reflect in their parenting styles. Both men agree that nature is directly relevant to man and that perhaps humans are closes to their natural state at infancy. Nature (the Art whereby God hath made and governes the World) is by the Art of man. (Hobbes 81) Their differences become clear when

Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx

772 words - 3 pages society, Karl Marx, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes had three different ways to reach to the same destination. Karl Marx claimed that "History is economics in action". John Locke's political theory advocates for common people can protest against an unjust ruler. Thomas Hobbes's "Leviathan" illustrates administration of natural and civil laws, as it powers many individuals who make themselves its people. "The philosophers have only interpreted the world

differences between the social contract theory of john locke and thomas hobbes

2347 words - 9 pages , men are necessarily at war. Locke and Rousseau, on the contrary, set forth the view that the state exists to preserve and protect the natural rights of its citizens. When governments fail in that task, citizens have the right and sometimes the duty to withdraw their support and even to rebel. 2. Hobbes view was that whatever the state does is just. All of society is a direct creation of the state, and a reflection of the will of the ruler

Comparison of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

1147 words - 5 pages , Hobbes’ view is more logically sound. Many people would like to believe that Rousseau’s view of humans having natural pity and overall just good-hearted beings. The fact of the matter however is that humans are not. Humans, like Hobbes says, are naturally greedy and power hungry. Throughout history there have been numerous examples where people look out only for the betterment of themselves, not others. Rousseau says that inequality and oppression

Similar Essays

Locke, Hobbes And Rousseau Essay

2084 words - 8 pages What is common in Locke, Hobbes and Rousseau is state of nature. In the state of nature all people are equal – although they have different talents they are equal, because having different talents doesn’t prevent equality - and have same rights but in time they try to command each other and make domination upon them. Hobbes associate this desire with the effort to dispel the insecurity which is caused by equality between people. According to

Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, And Machiavelli Essay

2342 words - 9 pages Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Machiavelli The thirteenth through the eighteenth century brought profound changes in the political realm of Western civilization. Beginning with the Scientific Revolution and only advancing during the Renaissance, secularization and skepticism lead to changes in not only the intellectual life of Westerners, but also to their politics. At the forefront of the political debate were well-versed men such as

It Compares Hobbes, Locke And Rousseau In Regards To Social Contract, The State Of Nature And Each Of Their Ideal Governments.

1843 words - 7 pages supreme direction of the general will, and in our capacity, we receive each member as indivisible part of the whole." Rousseau, along with Locke, stresses that the social contract is the basis of society. Rousseau was more profound though. He said that the social contract was between all members of society, and essentially replaced "natural" rights as the basis for human claims.Rousseau and Locke differ in what they consider characteristic of social

Differences Between Natural State In Hobbes And Locke

546 words - 2 pages Hobbes, governments arise out of necessity and the fear of death. This view is considerably more pessimistic than the Lockeian view wherein the state of nature is inconvenient, not a state of war.In both Hobbes and Locke the state of nature is accompanied by a natural law. In Hobbes natural law is more of a guideline of how people should act, however they are not obliged to act in such a way. In fact, in the absence of government Hobbes believes it