This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The North American Free Trade Agreement

3714 words - 15 pages

The North American Free Trade Agreement

NAFTA's proponents promised benefits for the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
Benefits such as new U.S. jobs, higher wages in Mexico, a growing U.S. trade surplus
with Mexico, environmental clean-up and improved health along the border—all have failed to take form.

It is commonly believed that free trade between nations is a mutually beneficial arrangement for all parties involved; indeed, this is held to be an absolute truth. Though free trade is undoubtedly the most effective form of commerce between countries from a purely economic standpoint, increasingly we find that our so-called "free trade agreements" are horribly unbalanced. Indicative of these fiascoes is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA is a lopsided and detrimental deal, hastily hammered out by an inexperienced group of American negotiators under constant pressure from the Bush Administration. I will outline several primary concerns about NAFTA, looking at the effects and circumstances surrounding the development of this deal.
In June 1990, president Salinas of Mexico met with president George Bush to discuss a proposal to expand Mexico's maquiladoras program (named for the Maquiladoras Act of 1972: a law designed to exempt international companies from certain environmental and labor laws) by establishing a free trade agreement between Mexico and America, and possibly Canada; anxious to find something to make him look favorable in the upcoming election, Bush jumped at the idea, and immediately began lobbying Congress for "fast-track" authority to bypass Congressional involvement in the subsequent trade negotiations. That hurdle overcome, President Bush hastily assembled a group of ad-hoc trade negotiators and threw them pell-mell at the professional Canadian negotiators and the high-priced Washington insiders and ex-government employees that had been hired by Mexico. On August 12, 1992, President Bush announced completion of the treaty and hailed it a major U.S. victory; by November, it had been signed into law.
What emerged from these back-room dealings was a monumentally flawed agreement. On the issue of job creation, the central focus of pro-NAFTA campaigning, it is fair to measure NAFTA's real-life results against its supporters' expansive promises of hundreds of thousands of new, high paying U.S. jobs. However, even measured against more lenient "do no harm" standard, NAFTA has been a failure. Consider this recent opinion poll of Americans on NAFTA's performance:

66% of Americans believe that free trade agreements between the U.S. and other countries cost the U.S. jobs.

66% of Americans believe that NAFTA has helped large corporations.

73% of Americans believe that NAFTA has not helped small business in the U.S.

58% of Americans agree that foreign trade has been bad for the U.S. economy because cheap imports have cost wages and jobs here.

81% of Americans say that Congress...

Find Another Essay On The North American Free Trade Agreement

Has the North American Free Trade Agreement Hurt the American Economy?

1005 words - 4 pages taking advantage of Mexico’s free trade agreement with the U.S. (Bethel University, 2006). Perched in his ivory tower and arguing for the defense of NAFTA is Daniel T. Griswold, who takes the view that NAFTA was both “an economic and foreign policy success” (Bethel University, 2006, p.286). Amazingly, in my view, Griswold takes the position that “NAFTA was more about foreign policy than about the domestic economy. Its biggest payoff…has been

The European Union (EU) vs the North American Free Trade Agreement

3368 words - 13 pages The European Union (EU) vs the North American Free Trade Agreement Introduction The European Union (EU) is the organization which integrates the countries listed below, both politically and economically. It is a customs union, which is an agreement amongst a group of countries to eliminate trade barriers between them on the movement of goods, services, labor and capital, and also to establish a common external tariff on goods and

Central American Free Trade Agreement

782 words - 3 pages the United States, more than 750,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and were replaced by low-wage service jobs. Working conditions in Mexico have deteriorated substantially with the maquila (sweatshops) sector as the primary source of new jobs: the median salary has lost 23% of its purchasing power, and 8 million more Mexican families live in poverty than before NAFTA went into effect. Not

North American Free Trade Agreement - Blue Valley High, AP Gov - Essay

402 words - 2 pages 1. North American Free Trade Agreement of 1993 2. Economic and Foreign 3. The policy created prosperity through increased trade and production which resulted in jobs for citizens of every country participating. Also inspired by eliminating tariffs to stimulate trade amongst the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Trading costs were high for Mexico to the United States due to the Trade and Tariff Act passed in 1984. 4. The policy relieved the

Significance of North American Free Trade Agreement for Canada - CHC2D0-E - Paper

1540 words - 7 pages The North American Free Trade Agreement is an arrangement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico that oversees many laws on the imports and exports of products between these three nations. Buying and selling goods without taxes, fees or hindrances was conducted through this agreement. North American Free Trade Agreement is one of the most influential international agreement between these three countries that defined the economic, social

Marketing of Honda motorcycles in the USA The North Americam Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

2020 words - 8 pages . Unfortuneatly, despite the solidity that our economy is so often associated with, we have accumulated a 5 trillion dollar (that's 9 zeros) national debt. Something has to be done about this colossal problem to ensure that the United States retains its status as a world power in the global economy. One vital catalyst to help promote growth and neutralize the massive account deficit and foreign debts is the North American Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA, for

European Union and the North American Free Trade

3022 words - 12 pages /law-and-ethics/similarities-differences-nafta-european-union-main-similarity-agreements-involve-single-approach-trade-countries-illustrate-explain/. [Accessed 01 December 2013 http://www.naftanow.org . 2013. North American Free Trade Agreement | The Agreement | NAFTANow.org. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.naftanow.org/agreement/default_en.asp. [Accessed 03 December 2013] http://www.oxfam.org. 2008. Regional Trade Agreements. [ONLINE] Available

Free Trade Agreement (FTA)

1093 words - 4 pages systems of FTA. The NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement); this began on Jan. 1, 1994. This agreement will remove most barriers to trade investment among the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Under NAFTA, all non-tariff barriers to agricultural trade between the United States and Mexico were eliminated. In addition, many tariffs were eliminated immediately, with others being phase out over periods of 5 to 15 years. Although U.S

Free Trade Agreement

2785 words - 11 pages as North- American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), U.S.- Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA), etc. Specifically, one of the longest standing of FTA is existing between Australia and New Zealand (ANZCER) - more than 20 years, known as the "Closer Economic Relationship" delivering economic benefits to both countries. Then Australia also has concluded two FTAs with Asian trading partners in

The Central American Free Trade Agreement - Central American Studies - Research Paper

3156 words - 13 pages Jorge Esparza Esparza1 Professor Carranza CAS 355 16 December 2013 The Central American Free Trade Agreement The hopes that the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) was going to help promote democracy, and stabilize the economy of Central America, is why U.S. President George W. Bush's proposed the agreement to the countries of

Implications and Issues of the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement

3374 words - 13 pages to date suggests there has been little diversion and that FTAs and regional agreements have been effective in encouraging wider trade liberalisation. A study of the impact of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2000) concluded that there was no evidence that the agreement had had diversionary effects. According to Professor Krueger (1999), the bulk of Mexican products that increased output/exports

Similar Essays

The Negative Effects Of The North American Free Trade Agreement

1211 words - 5 pages The Negative Effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement In January 1994, the United States, Mexico, and Canada implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), forming the largest free trade zone in the world. The goal of NAFTA is to create better trading conditions through tariff reduction, removal of investment barriers, and improvement of intellectual property protection. NAFTA continues to gradually reduce

North American Free Trade Agreement: Nafta

1615 words - 6 pages North American Free Trade Agreement: NAFTA Introduction      I believe that the North American Free Trade Agreement was an inevitable step in the evolution of the United States economic policy. The globilization of the world economy due to technological advances in computers and communications have shrunk the world to the point where no single country acting alone can effectively compete on the foreign market. Even

Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreement

1527 words - 6 pages Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreement In today's globalized economies, virtually every country in the world belongs to some form of regional integrated trade organization whether by direct membership, bilateral or multilateral agreement. Regional integration is a process by which sovereign states in a particular region enter into an agreement to promote economic growth through the reduction of barriers to trade restrictions

North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta)

2079 words - 9 pages NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA) Brief Overview: NAFTA, The North American Free Trade Agreement, came into existence on January 1, 1994. NAFTA is essentially a free-trade agreement between the 3 North American nations of the Unites States, Canada, and Mexico. The major thought behind this treaty was to give the citizens and the companies of the North American nations many incentives to trade between themselves. The duties on U.S