This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Not So Patriot Act Essay

1780 words - 7 pages

The Not So Patriotic Patriot Act
On September 11, 2001 the United States was attacked by a terrorist group on our own soil. On October 26, 2011 the US Government signed into law the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA Patriot Act). Only one and a half months after we were attacked physically by a terrorist group, our government decided that we would be better off with a lot less freedom in order to better protect America from terrorist attacks in the future. Although this seemed like an obvious need in 2001, now almost ten years later there is little evidence supporting a need for such an Act. The bottom line is that the Patriot Act allows the US Government the right to know all that we are doing, but nothing of what it is doing and why. The very freedoms we fought to protect when our country was born are now being taken away in the name of safety. Although there are many ways that the Patriot Act is directly in violation of the US Constitution the two sections that we are going to take a closer look at is Section 213 dealing with sneak and peek searches and Section 215 dealing with Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) orders for any tangible thing. The goal in this research paper is to look at how Section 213 and 215 are able to assist in stopping terrorism, how these could be misused and some ideas on how they could be revised to protect from terrorism but also give the appropriate rights to those not involved with any kind of terrorism activity.
After September 11, 2001, law enforcement agencies were concerned that the time window between getting a search warrant and executing the search warrant was too broad. Too many people are too well connected giving terrorist time to clear out before any hard evidence was found or arrest could be made. Section 213 was written into the Patriot Act as a way to “sneak and peek” locations before potential criminals or evidence had a chance to be relocated. This would give law enforcement time to completely search through someone’s property either physically or electronically without their knowledge of it. However, at some point, they were required to inform the party of their search. In many cases, law enforcement works within a time limit during investigation of a case and Section 213 is intended to give law enforcement more leeway on how the fourth amendment is interpreted in terrorist type cases.
To sum up Section 213, agents, through very little proof of evidence, are able to enter someone’s house and do a full search of their property without any kind of notice. Obviously when it is at the discretion of the officers, they will likely overuse this power to extend past just possible terrorist attacks and call for the use of this section in other cases as well. Although there are obvious issues with this ruling, Heather MacDonald in The Patriot Act Is No Slippery Slope argues that this section is...

Find Another Essay On The Not So Patriot Act

The USA Patriot Act Essay

2666 words - 11 pages explained. Still, critics say, the reason so many communities are denouncing the Patriot Act is because they believe the measure ? passed in the wake of the September 11attacks ? vastly expands the power of federal investigators, not only for investigating terrorism suspects, but also for probing into the lives of ordinary Americans. Timothy H. Edgar, the legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said that a far more frightening

The Patriot Act Essay

504 words - 2 pages The Patriot Act The patriot act: “THE UNITING AND STRENGHENING OF AMERICA BY PROVIDING APPROPRIATE TOOLS REQUIRED TO INTERCEPT AND OBSTRCT TERRORISM.” What do you think of when you hear this phrase? This is the phrase used to introduce what we call the patriot act. Pretty much the patriot act allows government officials to search your house which is called a “sneak and peak” without you being aware of it, or even the tracking of your car, or


1332 words - 5 pages criminal charge or even evidence, if the Attorney General considers them a threat to national security. If they commit minor or non-terrorist offenses, they can still be booted out, without so much as a day in court, because the law would exempt habeas corpus review in some cases. The PATRIOT ACT says that authorities can wiretap anybody for 15 days, and snoop on anyone's Internet usage (including chat and email), all without obtaining a warrant (22

The Patriot Act

1319 words - 5 pages security a little easier to fight, this would come to be known as the Patriot Act “PATRIOT” is an acronym for “Uniting and Strengthening America by providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The Patriot Act allows the government and law enforcement agencies to have certain freedoms that have not been allowed since before the attacks. The most controversial part of the Act is that surveillance guidelines have been

The Patriot Act Persuasive

796 words - 3 pages The PATRIOT Act: Taking Law Too FarMartin Luther King, Jr. describes an unjust law as "a code that a numerical power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself." While this definition is absolutely true, and was very relevant in King's time, the relevancy has decreased recently due to desegregation and civil rights. These days, however, we have a different kind of law that takes away from our freedoms and

America Needs the Patriot Act

880 words - 4 pages patriot act has enhanced information sharing in the United States between intelligence agencies to help prevent and stop acts of terrorism. Before the patriot act, intelligence agencies were not allowed to share information with each other making it more likely for a terrorist attack to happen. People support it because they fear terror attacks and say that they have nothing to hide. They believe that the Patriot act helps ruin terror plots and

Historical Methodologies: The Patriot Act

1280 words - 6 pages patriot act allows police to enter homes and seize your property without informing that a search has taken place through “sneak and peek” warrants. It spies on religious and political organizations without any evidence of criminal activity and citizens can be detained against their will and will not allow to have access to a lawyer based on “secret evidence” The media was more critical over the patriot act over the year with the most recent being

The Patriot Act: Pros & Cons

2217 words - 9 pages was different because he wanted to patch up relations with Muslims and the West but he has "extremist" friends so the government decided to kick him out ("A Visa Revoked" A22). This is another example of how the law is ineffective at stopping terrorists and hurts innocent people. Another way the Patriot Act is not working is cases that are labeled terrorist but are not. The terms in the act are so broad that it involves innocent people (Zeljak

The "Patriot Act"

1269 words - 5 pages intelligence information can now be more dangerous than ever before. Section 203 of the United States Patriot Act, authorizes the disclosure of the criminal and foreign intelligence information, which dose not have judicial supervision. Officials such as the CIA, FBI, INS, and other federal agencies are authorized to obtain this information that is necessary for investigation. The disclosure of internet and telephone conversations and foreign

The Patriot Act is Unconstitutional

2885 words - 12 pages infringes on the privacy of the American people, as well as others in the world. The Patriot Act should be weakened in order to preserve the rights of the American people and to reaffirm to the world that the U.S will not tolerate violations of human rights. On September, 11th, 2001, the United States faced the largest terrorist attack in its history. Over 3,000 innocent civilians lost their lives due to a terrorist attack. This attack gave

Russell Feingold: A Patriot Against the USA Patriot Act

1137 words - 5 pages Feingold’s constituents soared. Just five days after his controversial vote against the Patriot Act, “constituent response [was] running nearly 2 to 1 in favor of his position.” Feingold’s support did not come just from the Democrats and Liberals who most readily supported him. Notable Republican newspaper the Waukesha Freeman declared that, “Feingold deserves praise for taking on this tough cause when nobody else would,” and even went so far as to

Similar Essays

The Patriot Act Is Not So Patriotic

832 words - 3 pages immigration authorities in arresting and deporting immigrants suspected of terrorist acts. Under the Patriot Act, American law enforcement personnel have far more authority than is constitutional. This act should be repealed and should not be enforced.The Patriot Act has many loop holes and is open for interpretation for the government to use to its liking. The act states that anyone can be accused of terrorism by:"Guilt by association, association as

American Civil Liberties Are Not Violated By The Patriot Act

2131 words - 9 pages American Civil Liberties are NOT Violated by the Patriot Act As we face the threat of terrorism, how do we protect ourselves without hurting our freedoms? Today, terrorism is a major threat to our homeland security and has become increasingly more prevalent and difficult to monitor with the public's accessibility to communication and information through today's technology. Terrorists are now able to communicate more freely

The Usa Patriot Act Essay

955 words - 4 pages enforcement of several laws that may have prevented these attacks from ever occurring. The reason the laws were not and are not being enforced is because of the headache and time to get through all of the liberal, bureaucratic tape and sometimes even getting through that is impossible. This Act streamlines the process and eliminates the need for such a lengthy process to obtain what is needed to do the job. A lot of the Patriot Act critics claim

The Patriot Act Essay

2267 words - 10 pages in hindsight is the unparalleled power and access to information that was otherwise inaccessible, was now readily available to law enforcement agencies (American Civil Liberties Union). In the years that followed the Patriot Act, the harm done to the privacy of Americans was so great; the man who authored it was actively fighting to curtail the constitutional mess he created. In 2001 Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner worked with republican leaders