The National Security Agency is necessary in ensuring the safety of the United States and its people. When faced with the nationless entity of terrorism, we are forced to devise a response that can effectively predict and prevent acts of terror. The NSA is the most effective method of defending against the menace of extremist violence. The NSA, in its entirety, is completely vital towards US interests both domestically and internationally. Originally conceptualized as a small code-breaking unit in the second World War, the Signal Security Agency worked to effectively protect the United States borders from the Axis threats. Over the course of the development of the United States, that once small contingent evolved into an incredibly significant organization known today as the National Security Agency. The presence of the NSA is an extremely contentious issue because its methods of ensuring national security are often denounced as infringing upon civil liberties. However, when analyzing the NSA and its presence, it is important to think sagaciously. While minor breaches of personal liberty may occur, it is paramount to be conscious that in the grand scheme of national security, the upholding of all personal civil liberties to the maximum extent is sacrificed to ensure that American people can live without the imminent threat of terrorism. The U.S is and always will be a target, with our strength and power comes the necessity of retaining strong national security. One must consider the results and consequences that will come with any reform to the NSA, if the NSA were to be restrained, the threat of terrorism will be given greater means to plan, plot, and perform acts of terror. While the National Security Agency may possibly infringe on civil liberties, its presence and its methods are entirely necessary and a sacrifice that the United States people must come to accept.
The National Security Agency has operated and functioned, successfully, within the legal bounds that they have been given. Initially authorized by the the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 ( “FISA”), the NSA was given the measures by which it could survey foreign threats. The FISA Act defines “Electronic Surveillance”, in the context of the spying and retrieving information, as:
“The acquisition by an electronic, mechanical, or other surveillance device of the contents of any wire or radio communication sent by or intended to be received by a particular, known United States person who is in the United States, if the contents are acquired by intentionally targeting that United States person, under circumstances in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant would be required for law enforcement purposes”
After the FISA act was passed through the Congress, the NSA was afforded a bit of legal framework that could define some boundaries. However, many argue that these definitions do nothing to prevent the NSA from overstepping their bounds, and...