This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

"The Ontological Argument": Explain The Traditional Forms Of The Ontological Argument Put Forward By Anselm And Descartes

1584 words - 6 pages

a) Explain the traditional forms of the ontological argument put forward by Anselm and Descartes. (33 marks)The ontological argument is a deductive a priori argument that attempts to prove God's existence from logical reasoning. The first and best known ontological argument was proposed by St Anselm (Archbishop of Canterbury) in his writings 'Proslogion', however since then variations have been developed by other philosophers such as Rene Descartes, Gottfried Leibnix, Norman Malcolm, Charles Hartshorne and Alvin Plantinga; a modal logic version of the argument was formulated by Kurt Godel. The argument itself examines the concept and definition of God, stating that this implies the existence of God - it is to contradict oneself to say that God does not exist. There have been many versions because each one begins with a different notion or definition of God.In Proslogion Anselm wrote that he wished to form a single argument that 'needed nothing but itself alone for proof' and an argument that would, alone, be enough to prove that God exists and that he is the 'supreme God' Anselm belonged to a group called the 'early scholastics'; these were people who taught in religious schools, and used reasoning to solve problems.St Anselm states that the argument that can prove God's existence stems primarily from the definition of 'God', which he concluded as "something than which nothing greater can be thought", meaning God is the greatest possible being. Anselm was not referring to something that happens to be greater than anything else, materialistically; he is rather referring to his idea of perfection, of the 'absolute'. Regardless of whether you believe he exists or not, Anselm said that one could still comprehend this definition - and is able to imagine the greatest possible being. He then developed this definition, stating that if God existed in our minds, he must exist in reality, claiming that something that exists in reality is always far greater than something that exists only in our minds: "Surely than that-than-which-a-greater-cannot-be thought cannot exist in the mind alone. For if it exists solely in the mind it can be thought to exist in reality also, which is greater." Therefore if God only existed in our minds (i.e. if he didn't exist), he was not the greatest possible being, as something that exists outside of the mind is always greater. Anselm bases his argument on faith - it is an appeal to God to understand him better, not a quest to prove his existence for personal religious reasons.In the seventeenth century, Rene Descartes created a similar set of arguments. In his writings the 'Fifth Meditation', Descartes provides 'proof' showing that God does exist due to the fact that God is the supremely perfect being and one cannot be perfect without existing. For example, you cannot conceive a triangle whose interior angles do not add up to 180 degrees - it is a triangle's defining property, as perfection is God's.Descartes starts by dividing...

Find Another Essay On "The Ontological Argument": Explain the traditional forms of the ontological argument put forward by Anselm and Descartes

The Ontological Argument Essay

3667 words - 15 pages Outline and discuss the various forms of the Ontological Argument The Ontological Argument. Ontology is the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. "˜Onto' means "˜being', the ontological argument is an a priori argument. And ontological argument for God's existence is an attempt to prove rationally that God exists, without referring to Scriptures or otherwise. It differs from other arguments of that kind by taking as

The Ontological Argument Essay

1442 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument   The Ontological Argument, put forth by Saint Anselm in his Proslogium, attempts to prove the existence of God simply by the fact that we have a particular concept of God - that God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived." Saint Anselm presents a convincing argument that many people view as the work of a genius. It is also quite often considered a failure because, in William L. Rowe's words

Critique of the Ontological Argument

926 words - 4 pages Are human beings morally obliged to be mutually honest in a true friendship? Can a real friendship continue without honesty? For instance, let’s say friend A is good friends with both friends B and C, whom happen to be married with each other. Friend A finds out that husband B is having extra-marital sex without the consent of wife C. Should Friend A be honest to husband B’s wife C? I believe that friend A does have an obligation to tell

The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas

1455 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas Descartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, developed Anselm’s argument, in attempting to prove God’s existence from simply the meaning of the word ‘God’. The ontological argument is a priori argument, such arguments use logic to prove an initial definition to be correct. The basis of these arguments depends upon

strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument

983 words - 4 pages logic so the outcome is probable or possible not definite. The argument is in three forms; motion, causation and being. These are also the first three ways in the five ways presented by Aquinas through which he believed the existence of God could be shown. Aquinas regarded Aristotle as the principal philosopher so many of these concepts originate in the thinking of Aristotle. One example of the cosmological argument is the argument

Descartes - Ontological Argument

1044 words - 4 pages knowledge is discovered because of sensory input, besides the knowledge of God. Hence, our ideas of God are innate. We know for certain this knowledge must have been hardwired by another being. This ontological argument is required here because questioning God's intentions is necessary for addressing Descartes skeptical arguments. The skeptical challenge is addressed by questioning if God actually exists. God's existence can further be examined through

Anselms Ontological Argument And The Philosophers

1838 words - 7 pages Anselm's Ontological Argument and the Philosophers      Saint Anselm of Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury, perhaps during a moment of enlightenment or starvation-induced hallucination, succeeded in formulating an argument for God's existence which has been debated for almost a thousand years. It shows no sign of going away soon. It is an argument based solely on reason, distinguishing it from other arguments for the

Explain Anselm’s version of the Ontological Argument for proving God’s existence and Gaunilo’s criticism

1033 words - 5 pages exist “in both reality and thought”. It is true by definition which is the tautology aspect of his version of the Ontological argument. As you can see, the first part gives great emphasis on proving God’s existence. The second part of the argument attempted to demonstrate how God’s existence was “necessary” which means that God’s existence is not dependant on any other being. According to Anselm, it is God’s independent nature that means He is not a

Describe the ontological argument with reactions and contributions made to it by individual philosophers

1109 words - 4 pages The ontological argument is concerned with being it is an a priori argument for the existence of God. That is, it is not dependent on experience but is an argument where all knowledge is derived from the mind. It is also a type of argument that follows reason and not ones senses. The ontological argument is based on words and their meanings. Anselm (1033-1109), was the first philosopher to put forward the ontological argument in a logical form

Descartes Ontological Argument for God's Existence

1547 words - 6 pages true than saying that all ideas that are vague and ambiguous to me are untrue, unconditionally. Also, the existence of God depends on the clarity and distinctness with which we perceive the idea of God, for if it was not clear and distinct then it would not necessarily be true. But the clarity and distinctness of our thoughts depends on the existence of God. That is no less circular an argument than the one employed by the more traditional

St. Anselm's Ontological Argument

561 words - 2 pages is not the point he's trying to prove, thus contradicting the later premises. In order to avoid the contradiction, Anselm poses the idea of God existing in both the understanding and reality in premise (3). By rejecting the previous assumption of God only existing in the understanding and accepting the later premises, the opposite then becomes true.St. Anselm uses the reductio ad absurdum argument combined with strong reasoning to prove the ontological argument. He uses the premise that God only exists in the mind, to later prove that God also exists in reality.Perry, John. Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings. 2006.

Similar Essays

Explain The Development Of The Ontological Argument

1313 words - 6 pages Explain the development of the Ontological Argument The Ontological Argument was constructed differently to arguments such as, the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument. Whilst, these two were developed through revelation by drawing conclusions from observing external factors. The Ontological Argument was brought together through reason, this is the process of drawing conclusions through the mind’s logic. The Ontological Argument

Exposing The Weakness Of Saint Anselm Of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

1211 words - 5 pages Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument In a world of scientific inquiry, atheism, and the assassination of God, we are often neglectful of our Glorious God’s existence. With new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution, and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to edge God out of our lives, to be replaced with cold, empty scientific thought. What, with meme theory

Exploring The Ontological Argument Essay

2212 words - 9 pages contradiction to suppose that we can imagine a being greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined.)” (Himma, n.d., sec. 2a para. 2). 6. “Therefore, God exists.” (Himma, n.d., sec. 2a para. 2). To better explain the ontological argument of St. Anselm, I will explain each premise so that intention and purpose of the argument is clear. The first premise is pretty clear already. God is supposed the greatest being out there. Nothing

The Ontological Argument Essay

1593 words - 6 pages come to a conclusion by the use of reason and not proof. A deductive argument means that if the premises that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Thus, Anselm tends to base his argument on the definitions and terminology used. Anselm’s first form of the argument is that God is "that than which none greater can be conceived". Firstly, it must be emphasised that Anselm’s definition does not limit God to being