This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Prince By Niccole Machiavelli Essay

1030 words - 4 pages

The controversial Niccolo Machiavelli guides us to be a successful ruler in his novel, The Prince. Machiavelli explains the best ways for a prince or any ruler to rule a territory, prosper the society, and maintain their position. The book was intentionally just for Prince Lorenzo The Magnificent, a ruling member of the Medici family, but today, anyone can read this book to get some pointers on political issues. Because Machiavelli had ideas that were referable to evil and brutality, he raised a lot of eyebrows, and was called the devil by many. He believes that the ruler*s main focuses should be conquering, remaining in control of the people, and to always keep war in mind. It was very easy to understand him with his simple logic and I like his ideas, despite a few disagreements I had on his solutions to some problems. Some of his specific ideas were to be better off feared than loved by the people, to not be neutral, and to shun flattery.In Chapter 17, Machiavelli states it clearly that being feared by the people is safer thenbeing loved by them. He explains that every prince must desire to be considered merciful and not cruel, but should not misuse the mercifulness, or he would be taken advantage of. Those who inject a little cruelty now and then, will keep his subjects united and faithful, as they are afraid to disobey him in the sense that they will be punish severely. If the prince was to be merciful to all, though loved, he would cause disorders to arise, that would affect the whole society, instead of only the few that his cruelty has affected upon. A prince must not also be feared to a point of great hatred, because it leaves a door open for a rebellion by the people. Fear in an army would only make them stronger, since " . . . It is extremely necessary that he should not mind being thought cruel; for without this reputation he could not keep an army united or disposed to any duty." Pg 90. To find that perfect level, where the people fear you, yet remain loyal to you is achieved only if you were to use cruelty for proper justification or with sensible reasons. Machiavelli sums it up by saying, " . . . that man will love at their own free will, but fear at the will of the prince . . . [the prince] must rely on what is in his powers and not on what is in the powers of others . . . " pg 91.Whether to be neutral or not, referring to warfare, it hits home for us today. Machiavelli thinks that being neutral is a dangerous place to be for a prince, politically. Because if the prince is neutral, both sides would be against him. And that would lower his reputation which is something he cannot afford to lose is what I translate what Machiavelli is saying in Chapter 21. "Irresolute princes, to avoid...

Find Another Essay On The Prince by Niccole Machiavelli

The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, Chapter 18

1138 words - 5 pages classical culture of Ancient Greece and Rome. The Prince, published in 1513 at the decline of the Renaissance and written by Italian statesman and humanist thinker Niccolo Machiavelli, discusses how to successfully, some may say amorally, use power politics to rule successfully. In chapter eighteen of this piece of influential renaissance literature, Machiavelli gives practical and realistic advice on how to rule successfully and unify a group of people

Analysis of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

679 words - 3 pages "The Prince" by Niccolo Machiavelli is about the origination of a prince. More or less how a prince can start from the bottom and become a great king or die at the feet of his people before reaching his prime. To become a prince there are many different ways which is explain in this book for example "To arrive at this position depends not entirely on worth". Stating that there are a number of way you can become a prince by Favor of the people

machiavelli and the prince

1980 words - 8 pages , Machiavelli observed the effect of having one prince ruling a united country and in 1512 he wrote his most famous treatise The Prince. Remembering how the French benefitted from having one principality ruled by one prince, Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to centralize Italy under one principality, as well as how to gain, maintain political power. Most importantly, The Prince suggests how to rule effectively and what kind of prince is

Machiavelli The Prince Review

1268 words - 5 pages The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli isn't about one man's ways to feed his power hungry mindset through gluttony, nor is it just explaining altercations between a nation's states. This writing is regarding to how one's self-confidence can make them become powerful in a society and also, the way morals and politics differ and can be separate in a government. Originally, Machiavelli wrote The Prince to gain support from Lorenzo de' Medici, who

Utopia by Thomas More and The Prince by Machiavelli

819 words - 3 pages Utopia by Thomas More and The Prince by Machiavelli Thomas More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince both concern themselves with the fundamental issues of how a society works and maintains itself. The goals behind the two works, however, differ considerably. The goal of Utopia is to illustrate the maintenance of an “ideal” society and the goal of The Prince is to instruct a prince, or ruler, on how to maintain his state. On

This paper discusses the insights of The Prince by Machiavelli

698 words - 3 pages lived at a time of turmoil within the states of Italy but had held various diplomatic and administrative posts and had witnessed other ruling entities in Europe.One of the key aspects that Machiavelli talks about is fate and how it effects the decisions of a ruler. During Machiavelli's time, it was commonly thought that events were ruled by fate and by God only. Machiavelli did believe in fate, but he did not believe in the fact the fate

Book report on The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

1164 words - 5 pages The Prince, written by Niccolo Machiavelli, is one of the first examinations of politics and science from a purely scientific and rational perspective. Machiavelli theorizes that the state is only created if the people cooperate and work to maintain it. The state is also one of man?s greatest endeavors, and the state takes precedence over everything else. The state should be one?s primary focus, and maintaining the sovereignty of the state one?s

Cesare Borgia: An example in The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

768 words - 4 pages In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli considers Cesare Borgia to be perfect example for princes or whomever, to follow if they wish to apprehend how to secure and strengthen their principalities. Cesare Borgia, for Machiavelli, is an ideal lesson of a prince who had great prowess, gained his principality through good fortune by his father Pope Alexander VI, showed continuous actions by his efforts to secure his state quickly, and then lost it to

Political Ideology in The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli

745 words - 3 pages Niccolò Machiavelli transformed political theory by forming new ideas essential to the progress of Europe in the 16th century, strengthening the Heads of State in Italy, and revolutionizing views on politics through his views of power and dominance. The ideology that Niccolò Machiavelli manifested in his many political writings created a new motive for politics. Before he began his works such as The Prince and The Discourses, Machiavelli had

Morals and Ethics in The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

1501 words - 7 pages . However, while Machiavelli attempts to completely decouple the actions of good rulers from personal ethics, Erasmus argues that the church has lost track of its original principles down the line. In The Prince, Machiavelli attempts to completely decouple the actions of a good ruler from personal ethics. Machiavelli begins to do this by first establishing what he believes human nature to be Machiavelli argues that numerous traits that are innate

The Tao-te Ching by Lao-Tzu and The Prince by Machiavelli

1751 words - 7 pages “The Tao-te Ching” by Lao-Tzu and “The Prince” by Machiavelli Throughout history, it can be argued that at the core of the majority of successful societies has stood an effective allocation of leadership. Accordingly, in their respective works “The Tao-te Ching” and “The Prince”, Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli have sought to reach a more complete understanding of this relationship. The theme of political leaders and their intricate relationship

Similar Essays

The Prince By Machiavelli Essay

1237 words - 5 pages Living in a tumultuous era, filled with political and religious conflicts, warring city-states, and a continent ruled by a government who used the church to control and conquer, an exiled Machiavelli wrote the book The Prince to give politicians a basis on how to rule a nation and as a way to continue to make a statement in Florence’s politics. The book itself was unlike the regular “mirrors for princes”, in a sense that instead of telling the

The Prince, By Machiavelli Essay

1921 words - 8 pages more fitted for two different situations and the fact that Rome was able to call on them both was a great move. However, if it had been just one, it would’ve had a more defeated result because neither one would’ve been capable of success alone. In chapter IV of The Prince, Machiavelli explained that all known monarchies had been governed in either one of two ways. “. . . either by one Prince with all others as his servants, who, acting as his

The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli Essay

1074 words - 5 pages Niccolo di Bernardo dei Machiavelli also referred to as Niccolo Machiavelli born May 3, 1469 is an Italian Renaissance many of talents and qualities. He was a historian, politician, diplomat, philosopher, humanist, and writer. Machiavelli’s most notorious masterpiece was a novel called The Prince, which consider the most untraditional novel of the Italians renaissance period. Although, Machiavelli knew the consequences of his masterpiece

Commentary Of The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli

1177 words - 5 pages , by saying they’re “ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain,” because they will favor the prince “when danger is far away” but they’ll turn away in bad times. That’s why, if a prince has too much compassion with his men and relies on what they say, he won’t succeed and will “come to ruin”. Machiavelli points out that it is better for only a few individuals to be harmed out of a prince’s condemnation than