This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Main Strengths Of The Cosmological Argument

871 words - 3 pages

The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument
There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have
proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these
strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and
Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the
existence of a non-contingent being.

One of the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument is from Aquinas
way I that was about motion. This would be a posteriori argument
because you need to gather evidence from the world around you. Aquinas
stated that “Whatever is put in motion, is put in motion by another”,
by this he is saying that nothing can be both mover and moved. So
nothing can move by itself, it is easily to prove this by using an
example in the world. For example you could talk about the line of
humans, they depend on other factors to move. However you could state
that humans move by themselves because they can move at their own free
will, but that is only technically true, because we rely on muscles,
blood and the brain to help us move so we are not moving without help
from other factors. Nothing in this world can move by itself, there
will always be something moving it.

Another strength is from Aquinas way II that was about cause. He
states that “nothing is ever found to be the efficient cause of
itself” thus meaning that nothing can reproduce by itself or create
itself. Yet it could be said that the matter which created the earth
was created by itself. Nevertheless if that were true then that would
mean that matter was non-contingent and would mean we are all
non-contingent however we are because everything has a beginning and
an end.

One criticism of the Cosmological Argument asks why cannot God not be
the originator and now no longer exist? On the other hand Copleston
replied with his “In Esse” theory that God has to be there for
everything to exist. Without...

Find Another Essay On The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument

The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1245 words - 5 pages infinite regression of movers. Therefore, there must be an Unmoved Mover. This Unmoved Mover is God. Strengths of the argument The strengths of the Cosmological Argument consist of the simplicity and easily understandable concept that there cannot be an infinite number of causes to an event. Some arguments for God's existence require more thought and education in terms and concepts, but this argument is basic and

The cosmological argument for the existence of God

1445 words - 6 pages argument relies on science. The kalam argument says that everything that exists must have a cause. But we have seen that that is no longer true. The theory of the big bang, that the universe started in a little point and then exploded and is getting bigger. Scientists are saying that the universe is getting bigger suggests that there was a starting point, which is the big bang. But the big bang is only a theory and hasn't been proven. One of the main strengths of the cosmological argument is that how could any thing come from nothing. If using the big bang theory, how did the big bang happen itself? I believe in 1 God but think that the weaknesses are stronger than the strengths.

strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument

983 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not

The Cosmological Argument is Self-contradictory

1160 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument, also known as the First Cause Argument, is one of the most important arguments for the existence of God, not only because it is one of the more convincing, but also because it is one of the most used. The thought that everything that happens must have a cause and that the first cause of everything must have been God, is widespread. The cosmological argument is the argument from the existence

The Various Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

2389 words - 10 pages nothing moves itself goes against the fact that people and animals move themselves. He stated that Newton’s first law of motion, in which movement can be explained by a body’s own sluggishness from previous motion, disapproves Aquinas’s argument. It is possible for object to have uniform motion as well as to be in a state of rest. b) The strengths of the Cosmological Argument lie in both its simplicity and easily

Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1344 words - 5 pages Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The term cosmological comes from the Greek language, meaning ‘world’ or ‘universe.’ The argument is based on facts about the world. The topic of cosmology refers to the study of the universe. The cosmological argument begins with a general claim about the physical universe e.g. that some events have causes and that there must be a

The Key Ideas of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1709 words - 7 pages point, which is the big bang. But the big bang is only a theory and hasn’t been proven. One of the main strengths of the cosmological argument is that how could any thing come from nothing. If using the big bang theory, how did the big bang happen itself? I believe in 1 God but think that the weaknesses are stronger than the strengths.

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Ontological Argument - A Level - Information

1525 words - 7 pages reformulations of Plantinga and Malcolm. It is sometimes questioned what the main idea or purpose of the argument is, whether it is supposed to be a formal ‘proof’ of God to the atheist, or whether it is simply another way of interpreting or meditating on God’s existence. As Anselm wrote, “believing, I seek to understand.” Anselm lays out his argument by defining God as ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’. From here he states that

Does the Cosmological Argument persuasively argue for the existence of God? - Essay

2072 words - 9 pages The Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God are arguing for God's existence from the starting point of the existence of the universe. The word cosmological comes from the Greek word for cosmos meaning world or universe. The Cosmological Argument is an a posteriori and inductive argument which means it is based on our experience of the world around us. I will be arguing that the Cosmological Argument does persuasively argue for the

Describe The Main Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism

1040 words - 5 pages Utilitarianism was Originally formulated by Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century, and fully developed by John Stewart Mill in the 19th. It Asserts that we should always act so as to produce the greatest ratio of good to evil for everyone concerned with our decision and As with all moral theories, has many strengths and weaknesses.The prominant criticism of Utilitarianism is that it is extremely hard to predict the results of an action. The

The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument

862 words - 3 pages The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument Aquinas’s argument was as follows: If the universe was infinite, it would have an infinite number of days. The end of an infinite series of days can never be reached, so today would never arrive. However, today has arrived, so the past cannot be infinite. Time began when the universe began, which was an event. Events are caused; therefore there must have

Similar Essays

The Main Properties Of The Cosmological Argument

1220 words - 5 pages The Main Properties of the Cosmological Argument The cosmological argument began with Plato and ever since been defended and attacked by many great philosophers. One of the supporters was Leibniz. The cosmological argument is basically an argument about causation. Its major supporter was Thomas Aquinas though Gotfried Leibniz also put forward a simplified version of Aquinas's cosmological argument. The major critics

The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

940 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not logic so the outcome is probable or possible not definite. The argument is in three forms; motion, causation and being. These are also the first three ways in the

The Cosmological Argument Essay

1863 words - 7 pages must be caused to move. There cannot be an infinite regression of movers. Therefore, there must be an Unmoved Mover. This Unmoved Mover is God. Strengths of the argument The strengths of the Cosmological Argument lie in both its simplicity and easily comprehensible concept that there cannot be an infinite number of causes to an event. Some arguments for God's existence require more thought and training in

The Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

1298 words - 5 pages could a timeless cause give rise to a temporal effect? Moreover, the cause must transcend both matter and time to create matter and time. Finally, in order to create the universe ex nihilo, this cause must be enormously powerful, if not omnipotent. One is warranted in concluding that therefore, God exists. With that, I now turn it over to kohai for his opening argument. Works Cited 1. David S. Oderberg, "Traversal of the Infinite, the “Big Bang” and the Kalam Cosmological Argument", Philosophia Christi 4 (2002): 305-36 2. Alexander Pruss, "From the Grim Reaper Paradox to the Kalaam Argument" http://alexanderpruss.blogspot.com...