This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Personal Decision Of Euthanasia Essay

2060 words - 8 pages

The Personal Decision of Euthanasia

Every year two million people die in North America. Chronic illnesses, such as cancer or heart disease, account for two of every three deaths. Approximately seventy percent of those suffering from a chronic illness make a decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment (Choice in Dying). The ongoing debate concerning this issue remains whether patients should have the opportunity to implement euthanasia.
Euthanasia originated from the Greek work meaning "good death." It is the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies (Religious Tolerance). Euthanasia became a world renowned movement launched by a celebrated 1973 case of a doctor who helped her mother die and then was acquitted of criminal charges (Branegan 31). Since then it has been praised and protested all around the world. When a person commits an act of euthanasia, they bring about the death of another person because they believe that their existence is so bad that they would be better off dead. However, euthanasia has many different meanings, which tends to create confusion. Passive euthanasia refers to removing some form of life support, which allows nature to take its course. Forms of life support include removing life support machines, stopping medical procedures and medications, stopping food and water, or not delivering cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Active euthanasia refers to causing the death of a person through a direct action, in response to a request from the person. Physician-assisted suicide refers to a request physician supplying information or the means of committing suicide to a person, so that they can end their own life. Involuntary euthanasia refers to the killing of a person in opposition of their wishes. This is basically a form of murder (Religious Tolerance 2-3).
Ultimately, euthanasia is a question of choice, empowering people to have control over their own bodies. But the choice is only to be given to an elite group of terminally ill patients. Advocates of voluntary euthanasia contend that a person should be allowed or assisted in their death, if a person is:
 Suffering from a terminal illness
 Unlikely to benefit from the discovery of a cure
 Suffering from intolerable pain as a result of the illness
 Has an enduring and rational wish to die
 Unable to commit suicide without assistance
(Overberg) Modern technological advances, such as respirators and kidney machines, have made it possible to sustain a patient's life for long periods of time. Proponents of euthanasia agree that prolonging life in this manner may cause great suffering to the patient and their family. As a result, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1985 completed the Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act. This act entitles patients the choice to refuse life support (Baird 167-171). It is a subtle form of...

Find Another Essay On The Personal Decision of Euthanasia

The history of euthanasia Essay

1953 words - 8 pages were also a financial drain on the society as a whole. Jost, a German writer, also presented the idea of a right to death. He argued that patients should be allowed to request or consent to euthanasia since sometimes a person’s personal value of life can drop down to nothing. Despite this beginning climb of support for euthanasia, in 1895 the medical society weighed in on the debate, releasing a scathing rebuttal against the proposal for, “making

The History of Euthanasia Essay

1426 words - 6 pages . Haiselden, who advised against performing surgery to save the child. Five days later, the baby was dead, and the case and Dr. Haiselden’s decision were widely debated. Many prominent thinkers, like Clarence Darrow and Helen Keller, argued that physicians had the right and the duty to decide whether a life was worth living. In the early 1900s, a physician’s ugly decision brought euthanasia to the evident of public debate. The use of euthanasia was

The Legalization of Euthanasia

1635 words - 7 pages pain and suffering, voluntary euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be available as a last resort option .” A request for euthanasia or assistance in suicide usually derives from severe patient distress and indicates significant suffering. Suffering comes in a variety of forms, and can be defined as an aversive experience characterized by the perception of personal distress that is generated by adverse factors that

The Ethics of Euthanasia

1417 words - 6 pages practice and research. Some of the major issues concerned with bioethics are: abortion, stem cell research, fertility drugs, defining death, and genetic engineering. The defining of death and the different topics that it involves, such as euthanasia, will be discussed in detail in the following essay.Before the development of advanced life support technologies, death was defined as the moment when one's heart stopped. Today, however, hospitals can

The Practice of Euthanasia

1212 words - 5 pages For years, people for and against the use of euthanasia have questioned and debated ethics of the use of euthanasia. The main debate has been about whether people have the right to end a life that many believe is given to us by God; However, changes in social values and political institutions have changed the focus of the debate throughout time, but to me the questions are still the same. Should we take a life that is given by God? Should the

The Effects of Euthanasia

1567 words - 7 pages The Effects of Euthanasia The case Wyatt v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust hinges on the life of Charlotte Wyatt who was born three months prematurely weighing less than a pound with serious heart and lung problems that have resulted in her needing to be hooked up to an oxygen machine indefinitely. The crux of the case is that the doctors (Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust) do not want to resuscitate Charlotte should her body fail and Charlotte’s

The Five Forms of Euthanasia

2424 words - 10 pages at least twenty percent of the cases go unreported (United). Another issue is the worry that many who chose euthanasia do so out of depression. Due to that concern some places have required patients seeking euthanasia to first be referred to a psychologist or psychiatrist to ensure they are not being impaired in their decision making by a mental disorder. Oregon—where this is required—is sadly failing in this regard and as such “some depressed

The Slippery Slope of Euthanasia

1289 words - 5 pages The debate on whether voluntary euthanasia should be legalized has been a controversial topic. Euthanasia is defined as ‘a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering’ [1]. Voluntary euthanasia refers to the patients who understand the terms in the consent and sign up under consciousness, while involuntary euthanasia is performed against patient's wishes and some people may

The Killer of Hope: Euthanasia

1484 words - 6 pages When asked, “Why it is important to accept Euthanasia?” the answer is always about releasing patient from pain, but why take a naïve solution when there is hope? Take a second and think about how will a one say goodbye to the ones he love? The answer is obvious, it is impossible to let go of those we love. Hence, one should keep an open mind to the following lines whether you are against or for Euthanasia. Euthanasia or so called physician

The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia

822 words - 3 pages The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia An incredibly controversial issue clouds the minds of millions of people everyday as death confronts them. The problem revolves around the ethics of euthanasia. Should medical assisted suicide be outlawed in all situations or under certain circumstances, could it be considered ethical? Do humans violate nature’s course with science and advanced technology by playing God? Why should doctors and

The Catholic View of Euthanasia

874 words - 3 pages The catholic view of euthanasia is that euthanasia is morally wrong. it has always been taught the importance of the commandement "you shall not kill". The church has said that "nothing and no one can in any way permit the killing of an innocent person, whether a foetus or an embryo, an infant or an adult, an old person, or one suffering from an incurable disease, or a person who is dying". the church says any law permitting euthanasia

Similar Essays

The Ethics Of Euthanasia Essay

560 words - 2 pages IntroductionIs euthanasia moral? Does anybody have the right to make the decision of life or death for another person? Should euthanasia be legal? Do religions accept euthanasia? These are just a few of the questions I will investigate in this essay.According to the dictionary, euthanasia is: 'The bringing out a gentle and painless death of a person suffering from a painful, incurable disease.'There are two main types of euthanasia. Active and

The Morality Of Euthanasia Essay

1031 words - 5 pages : active (injecting lethal substance or forces used to end patient’s life) and passive (withholding of life-sustaining treatments) (Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide, 2012). Therefore, I see four types of euthanasia: active voluntary euthanasia, where a patient makes a conscious decision to die; active involuntary euthanasia is when a lethal injection brings a patient to death without his or her consent; in passive voluntary euthanasia, the patient

The Legalization Of Euthanasia Essay

1914 words - 8 pages for the legalization of euthanasia. Shortly after in 1938, the Hemlock Society was formed. This society was established to help those with their decision to die and to offer support when they are ready to die. Doctor Jacob Kevorkian, also known as “Dr. Death”, was an American pathologist and euthanasia activist that willingly helped dozens of terminally ill people end their lives. Dr. Kevorkian once said, “The prosecutor calls it a crime, a

Non Voluntary Euthanasia: The Future Of Euthanasia

3037 words - 12 pages respect equal dignity.   It may be objected that these arguments are theoretical and do not necessarily apply to the actual decision-making required in medical practice at or near the end of life. Thus, it is said doctors are not monsters who would suddenly begin to take life indiscriminately, and the risk of extension of one euthanasia practice to the other is overstated and no more than scare mongering, for which, in any case, there is no