The Quality Management Challenge
Fast and consistent corrective action and preventive action (CAPA) processes are central to maintaining regulatory compliance and improving the quality of your product and service. The reality, however, is that many organizations today are struggling to establish an effective product quality management system. They have geographically dispersed engineering and manufacturing environments where information about product quality is decentralized and inconsistent. This is further complicated by the fact that different locations, business units, and departments use completely separate processes to communicate and resolve product deficiencies. The result is millions of dollars in increased warranty and service costs each year. The need to improve product quality management in the manufacturing and service phases of the product lifecycle is only half the equation. There is a greater benefit when companies can analyze product quality factors since such insight can drive improved design very early in the development process. Agile Product Quality Management provides a collaborative environment across the extended enterprise where teams dynamically update, access, and analyze information about product quality from internal departments, customers, and suppliers. Such visibility in a platform supports more-intelligent decisions about next-generation products (Contributor, 2011).
Quality Assurance procurement
The following provisions with their terms and conditions shall become an integral part of the purchase order to the extent specified in the purchase order and shall become a supplement to the presently existing terms and conditions of the purchase order. All specifications and standards referenced in this document are the latest issue in effect at the time of Purchase Order placement, unless otherwise stated(ViaSat, Inc., 2014).
The effectiveness on cost of quality:
Agile methodology is used where the scope is not clear and software is developed in an iterative manner. In other words Agile has very high leverage for scope changes. The term ‘Scope creep’ seems to have no relevance. But this term needs to be modified to suit the agile philosophy. Though scope is not clear, and development is iterative, when a particular iteration is decided and the functionality is chosen for development, ability to freeze on this chunk of functionality (pertaining to this particular iteration) is important for timely completion of the development of this iteration. This is to prevent iteration within iteration. This scope creep within iteration is highly deterrent to the timeliness as well as quality of the deliverable of this iteration. It could so happen that the code of a particular iteration can be scrapped in the future because of a large change in the functionality. In iterative mode of development, success depends on the ability of the team to freeze the scope of that iteration. Many a times the scope creep goes unnoticed or...