God is defined as “the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe” (“God”). I find it highly unlikely that God exists because if God is perfect in power and perfect in goodness then why are so many human attributes given to god: A perfect being would be one without emotions such as anger, hate, jealousy, sadness, and happiness to influence their decisions (“God”). I believe it stems from people’s innate sense to belong and be loved due to the evolution of society. Therefore, humans attempt to explain the unexplainable (the creation of the universe) by creating a deity which is not only all powerful but human-like as well because humans realize they are the most complex beings while also realizing they have no certain idea of how the universe and people were created. As a result humans, who have an innate sense of needing to belong and be loved as proved by nature, created a deity who provides humans with a sense of belonging while also serving as an explanation for the creation of the universe. However, there are more reasonable theories as to how the universe was created rather than God such as the Big Bang Theory:
Astronomers combine mathematical models with observations to develop workable theories of how the Universe came to be. The mathematical underpinnings of the Big Bang theory include Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity along with standard theories of fundamental particles. ("The Big Bang - NASA Science")
The Big Bang Theory may be just another theory but it is backed up by ideas that have yet to be proven wrong since the ideas were founded; For example, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, while confronting new anomalies, has yet to be proven wrong (“Overbye”). This shows that while God may be the popular choice for many humans there are more logical explanations for the creation of the universe rather than an all powerful creator. For instance, the main theory that supports The Big Bang Theory has yet to be proven wrong as stated earlier, but the theory of a God has yet to be proven right. Which is a more believable scenario: a creation theory supported by information that has yet to be proven wrong or the creation theory that has yet to be proven right in which a perfect being created the universe?
One critical argument in favor of theism is Thomas Aquinas’ argument that god exists. Aquinas’ argument is:
Everything that is moved is moved by another; Some things are in motion; Therefore, those things that are in motion are moved by another; This mover is itself either moved or not moved; If it is not moved then we have arrived at an Unmoved Mover (U.M.); If it is moved, then this regress either will go on infinitely or will terminate with an U.M.; It is impossible, however, for this regress to go on infinitely; Therefore, we must necessarily arrive at some U.M.; This unmoved mover is what we call God. (Aquinas 1)
In order for Aquinas’ argument to be valid, he must prove...