This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected The Cosmological Argument

862 words - 3 pages

The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument

Aquinas’s argument was as follows: If the universe was infinite, it
would have an infinite number of days. The end of an infinite series
of days can never be reached, so today would never arrive. However,
today has arrived, so the past cannot be infinite. Time began when the
universe began, which was an event. Events are caused; therefore there
must have been a first cause. This first cause was God.

Tennant said there are things in the world which are contingent. These
are "might not have beens" because they might have not existed.

Secondly, "The world is a real or imagined totality of individual
objects, none of which contain within themselves a reason for their
own existence." Here, he is saying that everything within the universe
is not self explanatory. He moves from saying that some things depend
on others, to saying that all things depend on others. All things can
only be explained by something external to them.

Third he said that the explanation for the existence of everything in
the universe must be external to the universe. If we accept both the
second premise, and the theory of Sufficient Reason, then it says that
outside the universe there must be a cause for everything inside the
universe. He then goes on to say that this explanation must be an
existent being which self explanatory is. This, Copleston refers to as
a necessary being. If everything within the universe is contingent or
dependant, then if we have accepted his ideas, the final explanation
must not be necessary. In other words, the final explanation could not
not exist. It could not fail to exist; it is not dependant on anything
else. This is what Copleston considers to be God.

One other supporting idea for the Cosmological argument is that of the
Big Bang theory. The idea that the universe was created by natural
causes, such as a large explosion, is considered frequently, but
thinkers and philosophers would then argue that the explosion could
have been as a result of a divine being, who wished it to happen, and
this was simply its way of completing its task.

However, amongst all the supporting...

Find Another Essay On The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument

The Main Properties of the Cosmological Argument

1220 words - 5 pages exist. Some great base must exist, he said, that was in itself the ultimate reason, the ultimate "brute fact". Coppleston, in his famous debate with Bertrand Russell, described Leibniz's logical end as a "necessary being" or a "being, which must and cannot not exist". However many major thinkers have rejected the cosmological argument such as David Hume. Hume states that it is illogical to think of God. God is

The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument

871 words - 3 pages because everything has a beginning and an end. One criticism of the Cosmological Argument asks why cannot God not be the originator and now no longer exist? On the other hand Copleston replied with his “In Esse” theory that God has to be there for everything to exist. Without God we would not be here, because he is non-contingent being and outside of time he will always be there (whom created the universe). Like the

The Cosmological Argument is Self-contradictory

1160 words - 5 pages thought to be an uncaused being, then this too would raise difficulties for the simple cosmological argument. For if God were an uncaused being then his existence would be a counterexample to premise 1. If God exists but does not have a cause of his existence then premise 1 is false, in which case the cosmological argument is unsound. If premise 1 is false, i.e. if some things that exist do not have a cause, then the

Outline and explain two reasons why some people argue that sociology cannot be a science - Sociology - Essay

432 words - 2 pages Some people, like the philosopher Karl Popper, believe the key feature of a practice that makes it scientific is its ability to be falsified. ‘All knowledge is capable of refutation at any moment’. For example, a scientist may hypothesise that all swans are white, and then proceed to search the surrounding area for black swans. It is impossible to say that all swans are white, as it is always possible for the next swan the researcher finds is

The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1245 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. Arguments like this are thought up to recognize why we and the universe exist. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically

The cosmological argument for the existence of God

1445 words - 6 pages A) The cosmological argument is to prove the existence of God. In this type of argument we are looking at cause and not design. This type of argument is an aposteriori argument because it is based upon experience. Thomas Aquinas puts the key ideas into 3 ways. First way is, motion/change. Nothing can move by itself or change itself. The first thing to have moved must have been moved by something else and that thing therefore must be God." It is

Does the Cosmological Argument prove that God exists? - Philosophy - Essay

970 words - 4 pages Does the cosmological argument prove that God exists? (15) The cosmological argument being a term that includes a number of arguments, asserts that the universe is a product of many causes and effects. This entails that as everything that has come to exist in the universe has to have been caused somehow then there must be a preliminary cause to start off the chain of events. Such a preliminary cause must be uncaused and the thesis of the

Opinion Survery...A paper written about what a random selected group of people feel about family traditions, and some reasons why they might feel that way

682 words - 3 pages family values.The first independent variable that I used for this issue, was the question of religion. For the dependent variables, I simply used "yes" and "no". With this independent variable I was not looking for a specific religion, just religious in general, that is why I only used "yes" or "no" for the dependent variables. Secondly, I used gender as a variable and my two dependant variables for this were male and female. Next, I asked the person

The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas

1455 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas Descartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, developed Anselm’s argument, in attempting to prove God’s existence from simply the meaning of the word ‘God’. The ontological argument is a priori argument, such arguments use logic to prove an initial definition to be correct. The basis of these arguments depends upon

The Reasons Why

867 words - 4 pages previous experiences that make up our schemas, and if one of the “important” values is suppressed the unconscious tries to bring it out through our dreams. There are many reasons why certain events occur. Whether it is our ancestors, culture, or underlying factor’s that bring about the event. Therefore, in order to break the cycle that has come about from these factors we must recognize what they are and then seek to control them. This is the

The Various Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

2389 words - 10 pages a genus. It could therefore be said that the cosmological argument can work on the assumption that the cause of existing things is not a thing, in which case the above contradiction would disappear. The Kalam argument depends on assumptions that can be rejected, for instance: that every event has a cause; that the universe needs an explanation outside the universe; that the question 'what caused God' is illegitimate

Similar Essays

The Reasons Why Re Urbanization As Opposed To Suburbanization Has Become A Common Process In Some Parts Of The World

275 words - 2 pages Physically, Socially, Economically and environmentally regenerate the docklands.One of the reasons why London would chose to regenerate the Docklands instead of suburbanizing is because that London is already too huge of a city, UK is a small island, if London grows anymore, it will be impossible to manage.Docklands is already in the inner city, transportation is in place, all there is to be done is to build up the buildings around the Docklands. Many

The Cosmological Argument Essay

1863 words - 7 pages must be caused to move. There cannot be an infinite regression of movers. Therefore, there must be an Unmoved Mover. This Unmoved Mover is God. Strengths of the argument The strengths of the Cosmological Argument lie in both its simplicity and easily comprehensible concept that there cannot be an infinite number of causes to an event. Some arguments for God's existence require more thought and training in

The Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

1298 words - 5 pages could a timeless cause give rise to a temporal effect? Moreover, the cause must transcend both matter and time to create matter and time. Finally, in order to create the universe ex nihilo, this cause must be enormously powerful, if not omnipotent. One is warranted in concluding that therefore, God exists. With that, I now turn it over to kohai for his opening argument. Works Cited 1. David S. Oderberg, "Traversal of the Infinite, the “Big Bang” and the Kalam Cosmological Argument", Philosophia Christi 4 (2002): 305-36 2. Alexander Pruss, "From the Grim Reaper Paradox to the Kalaam Argument"

What Was The Reason The U.S Dropped The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki? Find Out Some Of The Reasons Why This Happen And How It Got Started. Dbq

563 words - 2 pages Why Did the U.S Dropped the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?On August 6 and 9, 1945 the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by the first atomic bombs used in warfare. The United States decision to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima was strictly military measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post-Second-World-War era rather than a strictly diplomatic measure designed to force Japan's unconditional surrender. The