The Rights To Bear Arms Essay

1183 words - 5 pages

The Rights to Bear Arms

     Gun control is a very controversial issue among society at present. Many feel guns are the cause of a great amount of crime. This has been an especially popular topic recently in lieu of the shooting at Columbine and other high schools across the country. Are these crimes reason to take away our freedom to bear arms? I do not believe so. The average person uses guns mainly as a means of protection. If limitations are placed on guns, they will only stop the average American from obtaining a gun. The real criminals out there will still be able to obtain guns through the black market. Every American should have the right to protect them self.

The second amendment to the constitution of the United States says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”1 This amendment enforced a practice that had been occurring in America for years. When the constitution was forming, there was not a large standing army. Many inhabitants were minutemen, who needed a gun to help protect society; this is why the militia was mentioned in the amendment. The militia clause is merely a rationale for preserving the right.1 Even if today's well-regulated militia were the National Guard, the Second Amendment still protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.

     Many people feel this amendment should be changed, or more restrictions should be placed on people who want to purchase guns. Some believe that guns hurt more than they help, even though statistics prove otherwise. I feel that guns are not as big of a threat to society as people are lead to believe, mainly by the media. Fatal gun accidents declined by almost sixty percent from 1975 to 1995, even though the number of guns per capita increased by almost forty percent.2 The cart below shows that a number of crimes have started decreasing, even though sales in guns has increased. Recently, the media has shown many incidents of shootings in schools. This is nothing new, as the media makes it out to be. Schools have had trouble with crime for many years. Years ago metal detectors were installed in schools across the nation to stop violence in schools. These detectors were placed because there was a problem in the past. Crime related to guns has, in fact, gone down. The reality does not correspond to the perception created by the media. In 1992, 55 killings occurred in America's schools. In 1997 it was down to 25.3.2

Source: Data points from Gary Kleck, Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control, Walter de Gruyter, Inc., New York 1997, and FBI Uniform Crime Reports. (Handgun homicide rate became available in 1966.)

Guns are a deadly weapon, and should be used with caution. This is why there are gun control laws. The methods of gun control at present consist of the government restricting the ability of individual citizens to purchase weapons. The different types of...

Find Another Essay On The Rights to Bear Arms

The Right to Bear Arms Essay

1435 words - 6 pages Currently, The United States of America is at war against 27 words that were written by James Madison in 1789. The Bill of Rights is known as the first 10 amendments to The Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights states the rights of its citizens. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(Madison

The Right to Bear Arms Essay

1397 words - 6 pages In the United States the right to own a gun is enshrined by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The text of the Second Amendment reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Adams, 2004). The founding fathers borrowed this idea from Niccolo Machiavelli, the Italian thinker. He wrote about the weapons necessary for freedom to

The Right to Bear Arms

2044 words - 9 pages statement, you will see that “a well-regulated” means firmly controlled, or held to high standards. A militia is a group militant citizens. Next, the phrase “being necessary to the security of a free State,” means we have permission defend our rights to being a free country. Following, we have “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed,” which explains our entitlement to acquire firearms. Secondly, guns are used for more

The Right to Bear Arms

2039 words - 8 pages enemies were approaching from various directions such as from the sea or borders. Thus, everyone had to be arm to survive. Also, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution allowed the American citizens to bear arms. It stated, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” A revolution of technology in the history should be considered as a factor that increased the carrying arms in the country. In 1840, Samuel Colt invented a

The Right to Bear Arms - 1575 words

1575 words - 7 pages In 1791 the United States government added the second amendment to the constitution. As stated in the Constitution, this amendment states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. In the early years of the United States it was common for people to walk around with their rifles or revolvers. Nobody really gave a second look or glared at them like they were doing something wrong. Openly carrying a firearm was

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms

1677 words - 7 pages The Right to Keep and Bear Arms The right to keep and bear arms was considered a fundamental, individual right in the original 13 colonies from the pre-Revolutionary period through the ratification of the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution in 1791. The Amendment states: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The right to keep and

Keeping the Right to Bear Arms Alive

1731 words - 7 pages creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations. (Barack Obama)." The president disagreed with a law our founding fathers created. It says in The 2nd Amendment; ” A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Why would we as Americans throw away what our founding fathers fought so hard for us to

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1292 words - 6 pages State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It guarantees the people’s right to keep and bear arms. The opposition may say that we should interpret this to mean that citizens may carry arms for a “well regulated militia” but not concealed personal carry. However, nowadays, even if we do not need to carry arms for such a purpose as we have an actual police force and military for such a purpose, we have our personal

Right to bear arms

742 words - 3 pages Do you know what the second amendment is? Or do you just know the simplest definition? The second amendment is simply defined as the right to bear arms. In further definition, the right to bear arms gives you the right to own a gun but restrains where you can take it and what type it is. First, one of the rights that is restricted is who can own a firearm. The Lewis V. The United States case is related to this restricted right because it is

Right to Bear Arms

742 words - 3 pages Right to Bear Arms Gun control, a big deal in today’s society some people say that we should drop the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms. That is not the American way to do things you just cannot change the law because some people think guns kill people but they do not people kill people. Guns are a very big issue in today’s society. They have caused a huge uproar between the government and the people of the United States and it is

The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

1440 words - 6 pages this country stand upon. Would people really sit idle as the Government takes action to more obser to Tyranny? In addition to the Second Ammendment most people are unaware that the 14th or Civil Rights Ammendment also guarantees the right of freedmen to bear arms. Do advocates against the Second Ammendment suggest that we repeal this ammendment too? Many Americans would not go for that. Furthermore it is obvious that it would be impossible to

Similar Essays

The Bill Of Rights And The Right To Bear Arms

1244 words - 5 pages Enforcement Act by denying the right of the Negro victims to peaceably assemble, to bear arms, to enjoy due process of law and the equal protection of the laws, and of their right to vote and their exercise of that right. The defendants were also charged with two counts of preventing the victims from their natural rights & privileges granted to them as citizens of the United States and of Louisiana. The court dropped all charges against defendant for

The Rights Of The Second Amendment To Bear Arms

1003 words - 5 pages In recent years gun control has been a very hot topic. The Second Amendment, which was adopted on December 15, 1791 in the Bill of Rights, protected the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. Today that right is being tested by the government who plans to tighten its grips on gun control in America. Should or right to protect ourselves be infringed upon? That’s debatable. Guns play a major role in many criminal acts we see on the news in

The Right To Bear Arms Essay 565 Words

565 words - 2 pages After our Constitution was ratified in 1789 some congressmen were still unhappy. They demanded that some changes or "amendments" needed to be made. These changes were listed in what became the Bill of Rights. An issue that the early Americans found very relevant and important at this time was the right to bear arms. As a result they ratified the second amendment to our constitution which reads "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the

The Right To Bear Arms Essay

1073 words - 5 pages Rights with the mindset of having a law that allowed citizens to protect themselves from their government, as well as becoming more independent from it. During the Holocaust, the very first thing Hitler’s Nazi did was to deny the right to own firearms. This event led to one of the most catastrophic genocides in history. If the right to bear arms were not taken away then this would not have happened. The people could have put up a resistance and