The Role Of The Commissioner For Judicial Appointments

1186 words - 5 pages

The Role of the Commissioner for Judicial Appointments

The commission was set up originally after Sir Leonard Peach was
ordered to provide a report into how the proceedings of appointments
for the judiciary and the Queen’s Counsel was made. The main aim of
the report was to evaluate the procedures into how judicial and
Queen’s counsel appointments are made. In particular the effectiveness
of the criteria given and the procedures for the selection of the best
candidates, the safeguards against discrimination against race or
gender and the way in which candidates are assessed with regards to
the criteria.

Lord Irvine the current Lord Chancellor before appointment into office
had strongly criticised the so-called secretive and outdated system
and had called for an independent appointments commission. Now that he
has been appointed into his current position, the independent
commission for judicial appointments set up does not actually appoints
the judiciary but instead monitors the Lord Chancellor’s team that
does. In a damning report, it was found that the appointments system
was said to be slow, unsystematic and unprofessional. It also found
that a number of senior judges and leaders of the legal profession did
not provide detailed reasons for their assessments, which was a
requirement. It has been suggested the current system is still
producing a white male dominated judiciary due to the lack of

The goal of the commission set up after Sir Leonard’s report is to
investigate complaints and review the appointments process, and does
not have any role in the appointment of the judiciary or the Queen’s
Counsel. None of the commissioners appointed are practising lawyers
therefore ensuring total independence and bias from the subject
matter. The commission can only examine and report the finding
concerned and is not an appeal body.

The commissioners may investigate any complaints that have arisen from
the application of the appointment’s procedures. In doing so the
commissioner would investigate into whether the complainant’s
application was treated fairly, this would include whether information
gathered and decisions made had complied with the policy stated and
whether the applicant was evaluated against the stated criteria for
the appointment concerned.

The commissioners will only accept complaints that are relevant to
appointments within the judiciary and the Queen’s Counsel, to
competitions after the commission was established and finally if the
complainant has already received feedback from the Lord Chancellor’s
department on the application concerned. Once the complaint has been
accepted will normally refer it to the director general of the
judicial group. Papers regarding the complainant’s application will be
sought after, which would include the...

Find Another Essay On The Role of the Commissioner for Judicial Appointments

Components of the US Judicial System

845 words - 3 pages Points I will cover in this essay are :Summery of the US Judicial System,standard organizational system and issues and challenges that faces each component system. The three component of US justice police, courts and corrections organization and administration work diligently and effortless to deliver the optimal fairness to much extent .How the three component of the US justice system deliver fairness is sometimes questionable. The three

Judicial Process of the Supreme Court

1167 words - 5 pages for its entire American people. Furthermore, the nature of the judicial process of the Supreme Court contains power on controversial cases throughout the conception by stipulating the Supreme Courts discretionary jurisdiction over state and federal courts in addition to its original jurisdiction. The Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) violated the rights of African Americans, which segregated blacks from white schools in result of

The Judicial Process

1989 words - 8 pages The Judicial ProcessRahmaad EkpaGOVT 2302 - 8414Instructor Rey FloresOctober 1, 2011The Judicial ProcessIn America's history it is clear our country has grown. The growth of our country has shifted the role of our government from its original purpose. A government that was intended to lead this nation and be the guiding light of truth, justice, and the American way has now become corrupted by the power it wields. The three branches of power that

The useful and important role judicial review plays in the United Kingdom's constitution.

1966 words - 8 pages Justify the following: "The decision of Maurice Kay J. in R (on the application of Medway and Kent Councils, Essex County and Norman and David Fosset) v Secretary of State for Transport QBD, Admin. Ct. 26 Nov. 2002, illustrates the useful and important role judicial review plays in the United Kingdom's constitution."The operational system of government is divided into "inferior bodies" otherwise known as administrative bodies. These are bodies

The Intervention of the Judicial System in Violence Against Women

1454 words - 6 pages The Intervention of the Judicial System in Violence Against Women Women in this country have been a part of violence for an enormous amount of time. This violence includes pornography, rape, and even domestic violence. The United States judicial system has intervened into the so-called private sphere and eradicated women in society, providing precedent and even updating statutes as well as other types of legislation. Without intervention

Morality in the Judicial Process

2221 words - 9 pages despite his doubt of the constitutional correctness of the original ruling. Although it is tempting to think of these choices as rooted purely in academic theory, all of them have implications for - and are informed by considerations of - the wisdom, justice, social impact and morality of the decision. It will not be controversial to anyone who follows the judicial process to suggest that these academic theories held by justices tend to align

Tension Between the Legislative and Judicial Arms of Government

1991 words - 8 pages order. This often includes criticism of the judiciary for perceived lenient sentencing. It is sometimes noted that the Attorney General, who has ultimate responsibility for the judicial system has to decide whether to defend the group he is responsible for, or join with his political colleagues in the attacksFrustrated politicians and legislators often complain that the High Court goes beyond its power derived from the separation of powers

Judicial Review in the UK

2083 words - 8 pages The role of the courts in judicial review is to ensure that Public authorities act lawfully; all such authorities are subject to the rule of law and are not permitted to act ‘ultra vires’ (beyond their powers). The power that authorities have comes from powers granted to that authority by statute or delegated legislation. The Human Rights Act 1988 (HRA) created an additional ground s6(1) making it unlawful for public bodies to act in a

Science and the Judicial System

869 words - 3 pages both together through connections hopefully to support my idea that they are both inextricably connected to what we call life and its relationship to the human mind. Science is a controversial subject very much like Judicial System. Although Science is largely composed of observation, experiments and their results, it raises controversy because imagination and perspective play a key role in those interpretations. As we know that imagination

Judicial Branch: The Government's Ear

1266 words - 5 pages listened to and decided upon by the Judicial Branch. This branch has the power to sentence a person for breaking a law or to grant them money because of a wrongdoing by the government. Either way, the Judicial Branch is the spokes person of the Government and the mediator between the people and the government. Although the Legislative branch makes the laws, the Judicial Branch decides on what those laws actually mean. The Judicial branch has limited

Who Guards the Guardians? Judicial Control of Administration

2827 words - 11 pages Administrative law encompasses laws and legal principles governing the administration and regulation of government agencies (both Federal and state). Such agencies are delegated power by Congress (or in the case of a state agency, the state legislature) to act as agents for the executive. Generally, administrative agencies are created to protect a public interest rather than to vindicate private rights. So basically, the administrative law is

Similar Essays

The Need For Judicial Diversity Essay

2013 words - 8 pages ) ‘ Equalilty and the judiciary : why should we want more women judges ?’ Public Law • Legg, T (2001) ‘ Judges for the new century’ Public Law • Malleson, K (2004) ‘ Creating a Judicial Appointments Commission : which model works best ?’ Public Law • Moran, L (2006) ‘Judicial diversity and the challenge of sexuality : some preliminary findings’ Sydney Law Review • Rackley, E (2005) ‘When Hercules met the happy Prince : Re- imagining the judge

The Importance Of Judicial Review

1215 words - 5 pages By creating a Constitution, it is assumed that the people are going to agree to it as the law of the land. The Supreme Court is responsible for upholding the Constitution by interpreting the laws for the benefit of the people. The justices would be violating their oath if they were to oblige this obligation. If the Constitution were not the law of the land, why would it exist? This is the justification for judicial review, or the right of the

The Power Of Judicial Review

1323 words - 6 pages for writs of mandamus. Marshall compared this act to the third article of the Constitution, which discussed all of the powers of the court, and found that Congress had no power to change the original jurisdiction, therefore finding the Judiciary Act unconstitutional. This is where the problem of judicial review arose in this case. Marshall found an act of congress unconstitutional and declared it null and void. This meant that Marbury, in addition

The History Of Lie Detection And The Role Played In Judicial Law

3054 words - 12 pages suspects during interrogation. Using this method, he was able to detect significant changes in blood pressure when the subject was lying. Excited with his success, he claimed to have discovered the specific lie response, predicting “the end to man’s long, futile striving for a means of distinguishing truth-telling from deception” (Marston 1938). Marston’s “systolic blood pressure detection test” later became famous for its role in catalyzing a