The Royal Prerogative Essay

2510 words - 10 pages

The royal prerogative is a source of constitutional law; it is derived from common law powers that have been handed down from the monarchy to the executive. The significance of the prerogative in constitutional law is that it provides the executive with considerable power to act without following ‘normal’ parliamentary procedures. As Dicey explained, the prerogative is ‘every act which the executive government can lawfully do without the authority of an Act of parliament’.
In constitutional terms, it is therefore important to explore the means by which the UK constitution secures the accountability for the exercise of prerogative powers by the executives.
Historically the prerogative was exercised by the monarchy, the majority of powers are now used by ministers, and very few remained the personal preserve of the sovereign. The extent to which the judiciary and the legislature are able to regulate the exercise of prerogative powers by the executive has increased. However, there are still some who are concerned by the lack of control that can be exerted by the other constitutional bodies.
The challenges to the power of the Monarch was by the reign of James I (1603-25) the monarch was faced with an increasing effective Parliament, culminating in the temporary abolition of the monarchy in (1625). Consequently, the monarchy’s powers were eroded by both revolution and by legal challenges, which included the case of Proclamations (1611) , the monarchy could not change the law by proclamation. The law of the land, which required that the law be made by Parliament, limited the prerogative. In the case of Prohibitions Del Roy (1607) the Monarch had no right to act as a judge, and in the case of the Ship Money Case (1637), although the court declared it to be within the Monarch’s power to determine a state of emergency, requiring tax raising, the Ship Money Act 1637 was passed, making it illegal for the monarch to raise taxation. The bill of rights of (1688) can be seen as the historical origin of the supremacy of parliament and since that point, many of the prerogative powers have been abolished or superseded by the state. Prerogative powers, then can be described as the residual powers of the state that are not governed by the legislation and do not require authorisation by parliament.
These include important matters of governance; the disposition of the armed forces; regulation of the armed forces: the grant of honours; diplomatic relations and making of treaties; the appointment of the minister and the dissolution of parliament.
The queen retains the personal power to grant certain honours, to assent the Bills passed by parliament, to appoint the prime minister, and to dissolve parliament.The powers that fall within its scope are often of crucial importance to government, and it is perhaps peculiar that the limitations and controls upon the prerogative have not yet been formalised.
Modern use of prerogative powers may be defined as the legal...

Find Another Essay On The Royal Prerogative

To what extent can the UK be said to feature a "constitutional government"?

814 words - 3 pages A constitution is a system of rules which describes the structure and powers of government, the relationship between different parts of the government and citizen. When talking about a constitutional government, we really mean whether or not the United Kingdom has a constitution. This is a discussion which has been argued over many years. The sources of the constitution are also important, statue law, common law, royal prerogative, conventions

To what extent & for what reasons did divisions emerge in Parliament between the summer of 1641 & the summer of 1642?

1145 words - 5 pages during this time. Finally, in December of 1641, the Militia Bill was passed. The following year in January, there was the attempted arrest of the Five members of Parliament and the King leaves London.In early 1641, to begin to dismantle Personal rule, the Prerogative Courts of Star Chamber and High Commission were abolished, and Ship Money and Knighthood issues were declared illegal. The limits of the royal forest were also redefined, (so some people

Clash of civilizations

1000 words - 4 pages Russia on the other. Of course this issue quickly defused. What about religion? Religion defines a culture meaning that one’s religious views can shape the way they see things in a political since. According to the article “Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom”4 states that after the Second World War, the vast majority of British colonies and territories became independent, effectively bringing the empire to an end. Many Crown prerogatives

Elizabeth's Reaction to the Execution of Mary Queen of Scots

1369 words - 5 pages succession, he gave his urgent request that she marry, asking her for an heir. Parliamentary pressure ensued in early 1559, when the House of Commons entered its plea for her to marry. Revisionist view: Though parliamentary pressure was powerful; Elizabeth was reinforced on the marriage issue and others by the English tradition, which upheld royal prerogative. Revisionists claim that the 16th century Parliament

What have the events around UK’s decision not to participate in international action against Syria demonstrated about the nature of the UK constit

1403 words - 6 pages members of the House of Commons, with the leader of the opposition requesting the Prime Minister to refrain from using the powers of the royal prerogative to go ahead with an intervention. This rejection by the House of Commons speaks volumes about the constitution of the United Kingdom, its institutions, and the various doctrines pertaining to it. By nature, the constitution of the United Kingdom is largely unwritten in character, and wholly

Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629

4213 words - 17 pages increasingly joint rule. The will of Parliament for change represented a new era. Although no-one would dare go against the established belief that the King was above everyone else in the Kingdom, the extent to which they believed in Royal Prerogative, the Divine Right of Kings and other such feudal principles was becoming less clear cut. Parliament realised that the King could make mistakes and that some Kings were a lot

Critical Reflection on the Hidden Influence of the British Monarchy on Politics

2080 words - 9 pages 2014. Available at Hennessy, P. (2013) Confidence in British monarchy at all-time high, poll shows. The Telegraph [Online] Last accessed 16th March 2014. Available at Maer, L. and Gay, O. (2009) The Royal Prerogative. Parliament

Elizabeth’s Relationship With Her Parliaments

3129 words - 13 pages anything.” She portrayed herself as being uncooperative because she did not allow Parliament to discuss religion, marriage, foreign policy and succession as they came under royal prerogative, however Parliament also did not show that they were cooperative either, so conflict arose. However this view becomes questionable when the fact that the Queen tried to compromise is assessed. This is why the Revisionist

Civil War In England. Which Were More Important, Short-term Or Long-term Causes?

1033 words - 4 pages own interests.The measures Charles took to raise finances such as ship money and the composition of knighthood also caused much dislike. Ship money involved the crown levying ships from the Kingdom's ports for the purpose of national defence during emergency. During the Personal Rule, however, the King levied money in order to build and maintain the Royal Fleet and thereafter it was collected annually and so became a regular tax which was

The British Political System

2362 words - 9 pages intervene and refuse to give royal assent. Convention defines the Constitutional Position of the Crown. The monarch as the formal head of Government has the significant powers, which are called the “Royal Prerogative.” Firstly, she assents to Bills passed by Parliament, on the advice of Ministers. Secondly, giving audiences to Ministers, at which Her Majesty may be consulted, encourage and warn. Thirdly, opening each new session of Parliament. Lastly

Richard II

724 words - 3 pages dynastic ambitions in Castile, Spain. By leaving Gaunt left Richard at the mercy of his enemies, who instigated Parliament to impeach his chancellor, Michael de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, and created an eleven man commission to oversee the king's activities for a year. When Richard declared these measures treasonable violations of the royal prerogative, his opponents retaliated by having the Parliament of 1388 outlaw his closest friends, some of

Similar Essays

The Royal Perogative Essay

2007 words - 8 pages The royal prerogative is a source of constitutional law, it derives from common law powers that have from the monarchy to the executive. The significance in constitutional law of the prerogative is that it provides the executive with considerable power to act without following ‘normal’ parliamentary procedures. As Dicey explained, the prerogative is ‘every act which the executive government can lawfully do without the authority of an Act of

Critically Discuss Whether Prerogative Powers Exercised By Ministers Should Be Codified In Statute. Constitutional And Administrative Law Essay

2151 words - 9 pages : Text, Cases and Materials, 3rd edn. p383] [6: Foreign Affairs Committee, Kosovo (HC 1999-2000, 28-IV) para 166. ] “The purpose of our Parliament is to provide a government and to scrutinize their actions and decisions, but only to the extent that government will allow. This is not good enough. The royal prerogative is a chilling manifestation of the way in which our democracy is deficient.”[footnoteRef:7] [7: Charles Whardle MP, HC Debate

Was Australia's Participation In Iraq Illegal?

902 words - 4 pages conflict. To do this, it is first useful to look at who has the power to make such a decision, this being the, executive government, or more expressly, the Prime Minister. These powers are derived from 'royal-prerogative,' a common law authority that allows government to bypass parliament on several major issues. Through this, declaring war remains a purely executive act in which Parliament has no formal legal capacity and such is maintained by

The British Monarchy Essay

1042 words - 4 pages royal prerogative? The reason is the existence of monarchy makes the existing powers above the law. It is clear that supporting the monarchy is a conservative view because it is anachronistic to have a king or queen in modern, society multicultural. What's more, that is against progressive change. We ask for democracy, and we need democracy indeed, but is it possible in a monarchy country? Of course not. However