The Rule Of Law In America

1066 words - 5 pages

There is a Centuries long debate as to why our Nation’s Founding Fathers chose for us to be ruled under rule of law instead of rule of man. Our Founding Fathers founded this nation on a promotion “We the People”. They ruled that we should be led under the rule of law rather than the rule of man for multiple reasons. Our government now though is stipulating whether or not the old American government made the right choice, when compared to other foreign countries. At the beginning of our country the Constitution was not meant to be read as a collection a suggestions rather as a way to get men away from their old tendencies. Those were the days where the rights of the average man were the top priority of the government. Today however we need to remember that the rule of the law is supposed to focus on the rights of the citizens and not on who is wearing what in Hollywood. Over the years we have ruined our government, even Woodrow Wilson said, “I have unwillingly ruined my government.” The factors now included in Rule of Law are a little different from they were 250 years ago. To find out why the Founding Fathers Chose Rule of Law we need to look at several reasons why our nations’ officials like or don’t like the rule of law. We must also look at whether the factors are too much at this point for our nations to change and go another way with our leadership and the way we run our country.
The rule of law is required by the government to exercise its power with clearly written rules, legal principles, and regulations. In a rule of law system the government keeps guidelines, our constitution, setting our way of governing. In the other Countries they don’t always agree with the way we rule and vice versa. In Canada they are rules under rule of law and very loosely run their government the way we do, they just have a Prime Minister. The prime Minister rules under the same law though, as our presidents always have. The rule of Law is used in our society today as the fundamentals for our countries framework. The rule is said to make our society as fair and wealthy as it can possibly be now.
The factors to the Rule of Law now though are vast and great in number. They start with the limited government powers. That means that even the government is not above the law, no matter the act. That we are all, by the constitution, given the right to a trial by our peers and are innocent until proven guilty. Another main factor in the rule of law is the order and security of the nation. The order and security of the nation is what is supposed to keep everyone and their property safe. If the order and security of a rule of law nation fails then the government leaders are left with pandemonium. The last of the most important factors in a rule of law society is an open government. This means the relationship between the nation’s leaders and...

Find Another Essay On The Rule of Law in America

Rule of law Essay

9161 words - 37 pages Real and Imagined Threats to the Rule of Law: On Brian Tamanaha's Law As A Means To An End.† Ofer Raban∗ Brian Tamanaha's Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law is a book about an allegedly dangerous transformation of legal consciousness - from a "non-instrumental" to an "instrumental" view of the law.1 The book - which gathered rave peer reviews and was selected in 2007 for special honor by the Association of

The Melting Pot and Liberty: The Relationship Between Rule of Law and Shari'ah Law in a Multicultural Society

3512 words - 14 pages The relationship between the principally westernized concept of Rule of Law and the Islamic foundation of Shari'ah law have such fundamental differences that the contemporary melting pot of our multicultural society is being impeded by way of a divergence of customs. Where the premises of multiculturalism is to encourage equality while allowing citizens old and new to maintain their identity and take pride in their ancestry, it is also crucial

The Meaning and Constitutional Significance of the Rule of Law

2130 words - 9 pages The Meaning and Constitutional Significance of the Rule of Law The rule of law means different things to different people. The meaning of the rule of law is a state of order in which events conform to the law. The rule of law often is stated to be one of the fundamental doctrines of principle of the UKconstitutional. Generally it has been seen as a characteristic feature of western liberal democracies. A widely-assumed

Seperation of Powers and the Rule of Law

1139 words - 5 pages ‘…If you maltreat a penguin in the London Zoo, you do not escape prosecution because you are the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.’ The rule of law broadly requires; that all are equal before the law , that the government is subject to the law and must exercise its power according to the law, finally that ‘there exist fundamental individual liberties and minimum standards of justice, to which the law must conform’ . The rule of law is problematic

Malaysia: Rule of Law and Independence of the Judiciary

6151 words - 25 pages competition, guaranteed civil and political liberties, including freedoms of press, of speech and of association, accountability and transparency of governance and the Rule of Law. Given these principles of democracy and the alleged insufficiency of their adherence in Malaysia, the country has been referred to as a paradox of "semiauthoritarian" rule in a participatory political system and has therefore often been labeled as "semi-democratic" or

Lawyer: An Ambassador of the Rule of Law

1316 words - 5 pages Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2014- 15 Edition, Lawyers. 8 January 2014. Web. 10 March 2014. . Echaore-McDavid, Susan. Career Opportunities in Law and the Legal Industry, Second Edition. United States of America: Library of Congress, 2007. Print. “How Much Do Lawyers Make?” Access2knowledge.org. 7 September 2013. Web. 17

UK's Constitution: The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty

2184 words - 9 pages operation of the legal system and the manner in which the powers of the state are exercised. However, since the Parliament is capable of making any law whatsoever, the concept of the rule of law poses a contradiction to the principle of parliamentary supremacy, entailing that Parliament is not bound by the Rule of Law, and it can exercise power arbitrarily. The case of Jackson v Attorney General scrutinised the relationship between the rule of law and

The Extent to Which the Human Rights Act of 1998 Strengthened the Rule of Law in the U.K. Constitution

3695 words - 15 pages The Extent to Which the Human Rights Act of 1998 Strengthened the Rule of Law in the U.K. Constitution The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), an Act introduced to give effect to rights from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in domestic legislation. Its introduction has affected many legal areas; especially the conceptions of the rule of law and their place in the UK constitution. To understand the effect of the HRA

America Needs the Exclusionary Rule

2155 words - 9 pages evidence is inadmissible in a court of law. The point at which most desire to attack the exclusionary rule is that it enables those who are found with incriminating items to walk free. The most ardent critics of the exclusionary rule underestimate the good done by the rule, while appealing to commonly held paranoia of losing a war on crime in order to exaggerate its weaknesses.      The reason we make such a priority out of protecting the

Why is there so much disagreement about the meaning of the rule of law? Illustrate your answer with reference to at least two rule of law theorists.

1886 words - 8 pages There are several main approaches to defining the rule of law including formal and substantive, and functional conceptions of the rule of law. In this essay I am going to explore the formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law. The formulistic approach to the rule of law which is to explore the definitions of the rule of law we must look at the existence of certain criteria to test the rule of law and not see whether the law is ?good

The rule of Faith

1416 words - 6 pages theologians defended the Christian faith and communicated doctrines they believed were essential to the “rule of faith.” Irenaeus defended the understanding of salvation and the role of tradition in his book entitled Against Heresies. In opposition to the secret traditions the heretics claimed to have received from the apostles, Irenaeus argued that, the teachings of the apostles, which secure salvation for those who accept them, are made known

Similar Essays

The Rule Of Law In America

644 words - 3 pages were given the short end of the stick. But through all of this I do believe we have some of the most caring people in the world. To say that a bad government must be established for fear of anarchy is really saying that we should kill ourselves for fear of dying. Our country is a copy of Greek democracy because of founding fathers action to let us be. In US if you don’t have a rule of law there will be chaos. The founding fathers believed that

The Rule Of Law Essay

714 words - 3 pages The Rule of Law The rule of law maybe defined in brief as a doctrine that no individual, however powerful is above the law. In principle Rule of Law had a significant influence on attempts to restrain the arbitrary use of power by rulers and the growth of legally enforced Human Rights in many western countries. It is often used as a justification for separately legislative from

The Rule Of Law Essay

1289 words - 5 pages The Rule of Law The Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights 1688 were attempts made by people of the time to enforce the rule of law in Britain. The rule of law is a set of values or principles that are the cornerstone of our legal system. These principles are known or readily discoverable and therefore do not change without

The Rule Of Law Essay

1375 words - 6 pages The Rule of Law The United Kingdomis generally regarded as a country that has a tradition of respect for the rule of law. In general terms this means that there is a historical tradition of public bodies providing a specific legal justification for their actions, and of the courts adjudicating impartially on disputes between citizens and on disputes between citizens and the state. Furthermore this also means that those