This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Security Of A Free State: This Essay Points Out Some Of The Major Flaws In The Argument For Strict Gun Control And Argues For The Constitutional Right To Keep And Bear Arms.

1081 words - 4 pages

The possession and use of firearms is a source of much debate in the United States. Some people favor stringent gun control laws, while others are staunch supporters of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Both sides of the issue have many voters in agreement with them. For example, the "Million Mom March" is an organization (which incidentally, has only about 750,000 members) that supports stricter gun laws, believing that will make the world a safer place for kids. On the other side, we have the National Rifle Association, a 4 million-member group that lobbies for more liberal gun laws, in accordance with our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. While firearm opponents have strong convictions and beliefs, people supporting the right to own and use a gun have logic on their side. The power to keep and bear arms, which the second amendment of our constitution grants to Americans, is a vitally important right and we must vehemently protect it as such.An important aspect of the gun control debate that has been frequently making headlines lately is the right of citizens to carry concealed weapons. Challengers of this right like to assert that if ordinary people are granted the "right to carry", the country will be awash in shootouts, people will be toting their guns with them wherever they go and minor arguments will have deadly endings. However, the 36 states that already have laws allowing their residents to carry concealed weapons have not found this to be the case. In most states, only tiny fractions of people with "right to carry" permits have had their privilege revoked due to firearm misuse. For example, professor John R Lott, Jr, in an article for the Kansas City Star, wrote that "In the 15 years after Florida's concealed-carry law took effect in October 1987, about 800,000 licenses were issued. Only 143 of these (two-hundredths of 1 percent) were revoked because of firearms-related violations" and that "From 1996 through 1999, the first four years that Texas' concealed-handgun law was in effect, 215,000 people were licensed. Permit holders turned out to be law-abiding, with licensees convicted of a crime only 6 percent as often as other adult Texans". (Lott) People who are willing to purchase a gun legally, register it, and apply for and be accepted for a concealed weapons permit are generally not the people who are going to use their gun for illegal purposes. Not allowing legal gun owners the right to carry their weapon hidden on their person poses a serious imposition on their second amendment right. First of all, it forces them to transport or wear their guns in plain view, which can understandably make people around them nervous. If a person wants to drive with their gun to a shooting range, they must have the gun in plain sight or risk being accused of concealing a firearm. Just imagine the scene that might play out if that person is stopped by a police officer for a traffic violation. If an officer approaches a...

Find Another Essay On The Security of a Free State: This essay points out some of the major flaws in the argument for strict gun control and argues for the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Right to Bear Arms. This essay is about gun control and some problems with guns. It is pro guns for law-abiding Americans

609 words - 2 pages "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." These are the words of the second amendment as written by our forefathers. Many laws have since been passed on the right to bear arms. Currently laws are being drawn up to give the right to citizens to sue gun manufacturers. If this is passed who will be next, car manufacturers, toy companies? The

The Bill of Rights and the Right to Bear Arms

1244 words - 5 pages Firearms Act and other gun control laws that were created to mitigate violence? However, the most important question is would there be more or less crimes in the world if this amendment had not been written? The second amendment does give an individual the right to bear arms. Amendment two states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” However

Both sides of the gun control issue -Which Side of the Barrel? The right to bear arms

976 words - 4 pages Which Side of the Barrel?The right to bear arms in the 2nd Amendment has been debated before the ink on the Bill of Rights was dry. Both sides of the gun control issue have been passionate about their point of view. Both sides argue about what they feel are legitimate concerns about this controversial issue. A person who is still undecided on which side he should be on, will have his head spin while both sides spew out a myriad of facts and

This essay is about the Second Amendment and whether its meaning was for personal gun use or military gun use. It is based on the book "Whose Right to Bear Arms Did the Second Amendment Protect?"

622 words - 2 pages to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." (65) What does this mean? According to the Federalists, it guaranteed a strong central government who had control of the militia. They believed a militia was needed to keep the country in order and protect citizens from tyranny, especially by the mob, outside invaders, and corrupt individuals within the government.With guns in the hands of the individual, a militia was needed to stop rebellious

The Right to Bear Arms

1397 words - 6 pages In the United States the right to own a gun is enshrined by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The text of the Second Amendment reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Adams, 2004). The founding fathers borrowed this idea from Niccolo Machiavelli, the Italian thinker. He wrote about the weapons necessary for freedom to

Title: Gun Control, this essay is about the right to carry concealed weapons for the right of protection

595 words - 2 pages concealed weapons, and have experienced a large drop in the crime rate." ( Lott 2)The second amendment says, " That a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." (2nd Amendment 1) The right to carry concealed weapons should not be infringed upon, because it says so in the constitution. Studies also show that, "Restrictive laws have either increased

The Right to Bear Arms

2039 words - 8 pages enemies were approaching from various directions such as from the sea or borders. Thus, everyone had to be arm to survive. Also, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution allowed the American citizens to bear arms. It stated, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” A revolution of technology in the history should be considered as a factor that increased the carrying arms in the country. In 1840, Samuel Colt invented a

The Right to Bear Arms

1435 words - 6 pages Currently, The United States of America is at war against 27 words that were written by James Madison in 1789. The Bill of Rights is known as the first 10 amendments to The Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights states the rights of its citizens. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(Madison

The Right to Bear Arms

565 words - 2 pages security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." We are given this right in order to protect our lives as well as the lives of our families. The world has become a deadly place and firearms are effective tools when it comes to protecting yourself from danger. With the new threat of terrorism it now makes even more sense to own guns. We saw on September 11th, 2001 how vulnerable we truly are. If our

The Right To Bear Arms

1073 words - 5 pages Wisconsin to New York, Milwaukee City has three times the murder rate of New York City. I am convinced that this is due to the fact that New York has the right to carry firearms. I believe that law in Wisconsin defies our natural rights and should be declared invalid, as stated in the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being the necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

The Right to Bear Arms - 2044 words

2044 words - 9 pages statement, you will see that “a well-regulated” means firmly controlled, or held to high standards. A militia is a group militant citizens. Next, the phrase “being necessary to the security of a free State,” means we have permission defend our rights to being a free country. Following, we have “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed,” which explains our entitlement to acquire firearms. Secondly, guns are used for more

Similar Essays

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1677 words - 7 pages The Right to Keep and Bear Arms The right to keep and bear arms was considered a fundamental, individual right in the original 13 colonies from the pre-Revolutionary period through the ratification of the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution in 1791. The Amendment states: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The right to keep and

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1292 words - 6 pages State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It guarantees the people’s right to keep and bear arms. The opposition may say that we should interpret this to mean that citizens may carry arms for a “well regulated militia” but not concealed personal carry. However, nowadays, even if we do not need to carry arms for such a purpose as we have an actual police force and military for such a purpose, we have our personal

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms In The Usa

1209 words - 5 pages “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” These words have become forgotten as individuals, former member of the U.S. Supreme Court John Paul Stevens, attempt to strip away the individual aspect of the second amendment. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. However, if more

Americans Have The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

1547 words - 6 pages States of America have the right to keep and bear arms.      The controversy about the Second Amendment is derived from how it is worded (Jordan). The debate about the wording can be broken into two different arguments. To understand the arguments it is important to know how the Amendment is worded. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms