The Social Action Theory And Symbolic Interactionism

1302 words - 5 pages

The Social Action Theory and Symbolic Interactionism

Max Weber believed that individuals were the key to society. He
developed social action theory, the purpose of which was to find out
why individuals function in certain ways. He thought that every social
action performed by an individual had a meaning attached to it. Social
actions are the result of conscious thought processes that take into
consideration the reactions of other individuals. Weber identified
four types of social action which include, reason (an instrumentally
rational or calculated action), value or rational action (determined
by belief), emotion or effectual action (dependent upon the feelings
of the individual), and traditional action (determined by habit).

In order to investigate society and the role of the individual within
it, Weber developed a method of understanding called Verstehen. There
are two types of Verstehen. Aktuelles Verstehen is a process of direct
observation, and Erklarendes Verstehen, which is a process by which
you try to understand the motives of the individual from their own
perspective. The main concept of Verstehen is to look at society
through the eyes of the individual to try to interpret things in a
similar manner to which they would themselves.

Verstehen has various criticisms. It is possible that observation may
be influenced by personal bias. Direct observation also requires prior
knowledge of the culture being studied. Also, Verstehen assumes that
people in society rationally consider their actions, which may not
always be the case.

Weber believed that class would diversify (instead of the polarisation
that Marx predicted) and that society would become increasingly
fragmented. He thought that ownership of goods, wealth or skills were
more important than the ownership of the means of production. These
properties could be exchanged for money in the economic market - he
was of the opinion that this position in the economic market place
determined class position so that in theory there would be as many
class positions as economic positions. Therefore the class structure
of society is essentially an occupation structure.

Social action theory recognises other divisions apart from simply
class and also recognises that consumption of goods (by which status
groups are stratified) is just as important as the production (by
which class is stratified). It also draws attention to the importance
of the individual and their conscious actions. It does not however
place enough emphasis on class divisions, as it tends to concentrate
more on status.

Symbolic interactionists reject structure and believe that to study
society, the only way to do so is to concentrate on the individual.
Both theories believe in understanding the individual through the use
of empathy.

George Herbert...

Find Another Essay On The Social Action Theory and Symbolic Interactionism

Semiotics And Symbolic Interactionism Essay

1647 words - 7 pages theory is mostly about Herbert Blumer's three core principles of Symbolic Interactionism. These principles being: meaning, language and thought. Mead defines meaning as being "the construction of social reality". (Griffin 54) Meaning arises from the social interaction people have with each other. "Blumer starts with the premise that humans act toward people or things on the basis of the meanings they assign to those people or things." (Griffin 54) A

Symbolic Interactionism and YOU Essay

1731 words - 7 pages sociological theory of symbolic interactionism, where society and individual social interaction provides a subjective meaning to deviant behavior. Many social definitions change for the better, however some change for the worse. One such example was once viewed as normal, with no second thoughts given to it, but now is seen as an actual social problem affecting some groups aversely. This is the topic of homosexuality, a subject that has been on the

mead and symbolic interactionism

2569 words - 10 pages the customer wants and try to look untroubled by obnoxious requests. The barista wishes to convey to the customer that she is willing to meet the customer's needs. However, as soon as the customer leaves, the barista might deride the customer to coworkers. This shows how individuals are constantly attuned to audience and will alter their behaviors accordingly.Dramaturgy is a sociological perspective that is a component of symbolic interactionism

Comparison of the Social Exchange Theory and the Symbolic Interaction Theory

2133 words - 9 pages believe, Social Exchange is a theory entirely separate from Rational Choice theory. So, in keeping with this discovery and despite my better judgment, I will do my best to relay and critique the information I find on either one or both theories and then compare only Social Exchange theory to the Symbolic Interaction framework. Although I will try to get the same information for both theories, there are not many resources which describe Social Exchange

A Critical outline of the main features of Functionalism, Symbolic Interactionism And Marxism

1397 words - 6 pages primarily determined or influenced by the economic system, the means of production, such as the land, factories and offices necessary to produce societies goods. (Cited; Browne.K 'Introducing Sociology' 2002) This approach rejects the idea of society as a consensus but instead sees it based on the constant changing outcomes of conflicts between different groups. This type of approach is known as 'conflict theory'. Symbolic Interactionism is a social

The Symbolic Interaction Theory and My Family

1460 words - 6 pages relates to the Symbolic Interaction theory. Family members attach meaning to the action of my mom smoking and learn to act accordingly. The action is a way of communicating a need for time alone. While some symbols are a constant to a society, others are related only to certain situations or family member. The perception of an object or action determines how we react in a given situation. Theory two: Structural Functionalist The meaning of

Harbermas' Theory on Social Labor and Communicative Action

3267 words - 13 pages Harbermas' Theory on Social Labor and Communicative Action ABSTRACT: In contemporary philosophy and social theory, Harbermas's theory of communicative action stands indisputably for a modernity enlightened about itself and its potential. Yet, however much he professes his commitment to universalist ideals of inclusiveness and equality, his influential theory is also marked by disquieting statements on matters of gender. I argue that the

Functionalism Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interaction

581 words - 2 pages Functionalism Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interaction The functionalist thoery can be traced to a movement in the late nineteenth-century under the influences of Darwinism on the biological and social sciences. It is an attempt to understand the world, and it tests the cause and effect of sociological behavior. Some of the more famous functionalists are Charles Darwin, Emile Durkheim, and Horace Kallen. Horace Kallen's article in the

Exchange Theory and Communicative Action

1939 words - 8 pages and added that people calculated their actions based on the reward level of their action as well as the level of power they receive from their actions. Blau also explains how exchange theory becomes an institutionalization. I will also being going over Habermas’s uses of the theory of Communicative Action to develop a theory of society with practical intent. Homans observation of four different social groups; street gang, work group in a

The Causal Theory of Action: Overpopulation

1625 words - 7 pages Action. Thinkers like Davidson and Clarke do not do enough to solve this problem of mental overpopulation. They attempt to show that the Causal Theory of Action forms the foundation on which we act. The problem of mental overpopulation reveals the cracks in the casual theory’s foundation. Thus, the Causal Theory of Action cannot withstand the problem of mental overpopulation. The Causal Theory of Action is one way that philosophers try to

The Social Bond Theory

928 words - 4 pages In 1969, Travis Hirschi developed what is known as Social Bond Theory. Hirschi built on the work of other social control theorists and was able to provide a better picture of what social bond is. In Social Bond Theory there are four basic elements that make up social bonds. They are attachment, involvement, commitment, and belief. It is these four bonds that all humans hold and ultimately determine conformity or deviant behavior(Agnew, 1985

Similar Essays

Structural Funcionalism, Conflict Theory, And Symbolic Interactionism

1640 words - 7 pages his theory is structured, orderly change. If this were true, revolutions and civil wars would not occur. A stronger criticism of functionalism is that it is illogical from the basis of epistemological reasoning. From this viewpoint, functionalism is tautologous; where other social theories try to pinpoint the causes of certain societal behaviors or occurrences, functionalism sates that “functional analysis does not seek to explain why the action

Applications Of Symbolic Interactionism Theory Essay

683 words - 3 pages Applications of Symbolic Interactionism Theory George Herbert Mead begins his discussion of symbolic interactionism (talking with others) by defining three core principles that deal with meaning, language, and thought. The theory states that meaning is the construction of social reality. Humans act toward people or things on the basis of the meanings they assign to those people or things. The second principle of symbolic interactionism

Theories Of Symbolic Interactionism Exchange Theory And Rational Choice Theory

1073 words - 4 pages Theories of Symbolic Interactionism Exchange Theory and Rational Choice Theory This essay will address actions of individuals and the contribution individual actions make to the social structure, how society flows to the actor via the “Me” and is constructed or reconstructed by the “I,” giving the “I” a place in creating society. I will further analyze the theories and explore the impact of norms and values on the decisions by the actors

Social Control And Symbolic Interactionism In Literature

1351 words - 5 pages Social Control and Symbolic Interactionism in Literature The way in which social order is achieved has been the subject of many theories presented by respectable sociologists such as Emile Durkheim, Thomas Hobbes, George Herbert Mead, and Karl Marx. Among the most prominent of these theories are Hobbes’ “Social Control” theory and Meads’ “Symbolic Interactionism” theory. Through these two theories, it is possible to gain a better