The Stanford Prision Experiment Essay

768 words - 3 pages

Philip Zimbardo, a world-renowned psychologist at Sanford University, conducted the landmark psychological study known as ?The Stanford Prison Experiment?. Performed in the summer of 1973, the experiment set out to study the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. Volunteers played the roles of guards and prisoners, and lived in a mock prison. However, the quickly took a turn in the wrong direction, and concluded early.Subjects were recruited through an ad placed in the local newspaper and offered $15 a day to participate in a 1-2 week study. Of the 75 participants that were selected, Zimbardo selected 21 to take part in the prison experiment. The subjects were predominantly white, with the exception of 1 subject of oriental background, and middle-glass young males. Of these 21 males, half were divided, at random into two groups of ?prisoners? and ?guards.The prison was ran out of the basement of the Stanford Psychology building, which had been converted into the mock jail. A large hallway was converted into the housing for the prison, along with rooms for the guards, warden, and superintendent. Notably, Zimbardo played the position of the superintendent, and a research assistant by the name of Jaffe played the role of the warden. The environment in which the prison had been arranged allowed the prisoners to always be watched by the staff, with the exception of solitary confinement, lovingly called ?the hole?.With the experiment underway, Zimbardo set out to create an environment of obscurity, in which the guards and prisoners were identified not to be individuals but 2 cohesive unites. Zimbardo accomplished this by assigning certain physical characteristics to each groups. For the prisoners, who were made to wear smocks that resembled a dress, and no underwear, this caused them to adapt their normal behaviors and stance. Also for the guards, Zimbardo chose identical, neutral khaki uniforms and had the guards wear sunglass as to deter eye contact with the prisoners. This added another element to the environment of anonymity and allotted the guards a mysterious nature that the prisoners could not see.The experiment got out of hand very quickly. Prisoners suffered aggressive and humiliating maltreatment at the hands of the guards, and...

Find Another Essay On The Stanford Prision Experiment

Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation Critique

893 words - 4 pages PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: ARTICLE CRITIQUEArticle Critique Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation January 17, 2012This is a critique of an article published in Chronicle of Higher Education, (v53 n30 pB6 Mar. 30, 2007) on "Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation" by Philip G. Zimbardo. This article discusses issues related to how good people can turn

In this paper there are five questions asked and answered about the Stanford Experiment conducted in 1971. The questions are about the ethics of the experiment.

2135 words - 9 pages Discuss the ethics of the Stanford Prison Experiment. In your answer, be sure to touch on the parts of the experiment that may be considered unethical, why the study was conducted the way it was and what was done to protect the subjects, and whether you feel that under the current ethical guidelines this study could be conducted today.Ethics is thought of as a moral principle, or what should be right. The experiment that took place in the summer

Crossing The Line Question Posed By Instructor: Describe how The Stanford Prison Experiment relates to an event in history.

1406 words - 6 pages in action. So what would people who had undergone stringent psychological evaluations and testing be doing torturing people in the most inhumane ways imaginable? Was it just a few bad apples, or could it be something more? We can get a better understanding of what happened at Abu Ghraib by taking a closer look at The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Dr. Philip Zimbardo in 1971. In this experiment a group of young men answered an ad in a

The Evolution of Ethics in Psychology

2152 words - 9 pages ). ​In conclusion, if it were not for Stanley Milgrim’s experiment, Zimbardo’s Stanford prision experiment, and the 40-year long Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, we would not have such strict ethics codes protecting participants. This experiment now protects the participants from any physical and emotional harm that might stem during or after partaking in an experiment. It is important to note that because of the formation of the APA Ethics Board

Punishment in the Milgram Obedience Experiment

810 words - 3 pages teacher by pressing one of four buttons that lit up numbers for the teacher to see. The teachers were asked to shock the learner when questions were answered incorrectly stepping up the voltage for each wrong answer. The only real shock was a single 45-volt shock given to each teacher. This was to let the teachers see how the shocks would feel. (Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority) The Stanford Prison experiment was began in the summer of

Stanford Prison Experiment

772 words - 4 pages Gandhi once said “Our thoughts become our words, our words become our actions, our actions become our character, our character becomes our destiny.” That very quote was proven in the 1973 Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo. Zimbardo placed an ad in the newspaper asking for young males to par take in his experiment with in return getting paid $15 a day. Out of 75 volunteers 24 were chosen as participants. Zimbardo randomly

Critique Final

646 words - 3 pages Adriana Szeltner23 September 2014W1 W131Critique Final"The Stanford Prison Experiment" by Philip G. Zimbardo raises troubling questions about the ability of individuals to exist repressive or obedient roles, if the social setting requires these roles. Philip G. Zimbardo, professor of psychology at Stanford University, began researching how prisoners and guards assume submissive and authoritarian roles. Considering the riots and outbreaks that

Reviewing Zimbardo’s Experiment

949 words - 4 pages “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo was written to explain the results of the Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo while trying to gain support for his conclusions of the experiment, demonstrated many errors in his writing, and in his own experiment. The errors that Zimbardo commits call into question the validity of his argument, and the experiment. The goal explained by Zimbardo was “to understand more about the process by

The Core Allegiance of our Being: Are we Essentially Good or Evil? Examples in Modern Culture

1746 words - 7 pages , not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways” (Buddha). I have come to these conclusions because of real-life historical events and symbolism in the story, such as: the Stanford Prison Experiment, Abu Ghraib, Jack Merridew, the Jonestown massacre, and The Beast. In the summer of 1971, at Stanford University, Philip G. Zimbardo developed The Stanford Prison Experiment to test his theory on the Lucifer Effect. The theory that good people

The Menace Within

605 words - 2 pages things can be explained as common sense, but when two contradicting facts both seem as common sense, this is where you should start to think critically. Not because common sense is usually wrong, but because common sense more easily describes what has happened than what will happen.On week 3, we were given a handout called "The Menace Within". It talks about a psychological study called "The Stanford Prison Experiment" that took place in the

Fate in Holes by Louis Eochar

800 words - 4 pages is excited so he runs home and the police notice him, then he is arrested, then he is convicted guilty, then he is sent to juvinile prision, then he has to endure bad guards, endure poisionous lizards and he has to work all day in the blazing hot sun. The family curse affected everyone in Stanley's family by giving them bad luck and negative life outcomes. Stanley's great grandfather Stanley Yelnats II gets all of his valuables stolen when his

Similar Essays

The Implications Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

1115 words - 4 pages The Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Dr Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in the basement of Stanford University. This involved imprisoning nine volunteers in a mock up of Stanford prison, which was policed by nine guards (more volunteers). These guards had complete control over the prisoners. They could do anything to the prisoners, but use physical violence. The subjects were all students

The Ethics Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

941 words - 4 pages When put into the position of complete authority over others people will show their true colors. I think that most people would like to think that they would be fair, ethical superiors. I know I would, but learning about the Stanford Prison Experiment has made me question what would really happen if I was there. Would I be the submissive prisoner, the sadistic guard, or would I stay true to myself? As Phillip Zimbardo gave the guards their

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Philip Zimbardo

1937 words - 8 pages nailed to the floor and a metal toilet which is also nailed to the floor. They close the metal bars behind you and it’s loud. Then all you can hear are the chains of your neighbors. All of this, and you're innocent. These are the events that happened to twenty four college males who participated in the Stanford Prison Experiment. This is just one example of many controversial psychological experiments. Certain psychological experiments

A Critique Of The Stanford Experiment

561 words - 2 pages A Critique Of the Stanford Experiment'The Education of a Torturer' is an account of experiments that has similar resultsto that of Milgram's obedience experimentsthat were performed in 1963. Though bothexperiments vary drastically, both have one grim outcome, that is that, 'it is ordinarypeople, not psychopaths, who become the Eichmanns of history.'The Stanford experiment was performed by psychologists Craig Haney, W. CurtisBanks, and Philip