The Stem Cell Debate Is Not About Medical Benefits

2641 words - 11 pages

In the final analysis, the debate about embryonic stem cell research is not primarily about medical benefits.

In his great novel The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky raised the question whether it would be right to build a world without human suffering if "it was essential and inevitable to torture to death one tiny creature" such as an innocent child to achieve that end. Each of us must answer that ultimate question in the depths of his or her own conscience. The claim that destructive embryo research will achieve such a utopian end is, we believe, a hollow promise. In the meantime, however, the killing will be quite real.

We hope that you will consider these reflections and  agree that our government should not support research that relies on the destruction of innocent human beings.

Most Christians have grave concerns on this critically important issue of embryonic stem cell research. In our view, conducting research that relies on deliberate destruction of human embryos for their stem cells is illegal, immoral and unnecessary.

It is illegal because it violates an appropriations rider (the Dickey amendment) passed every year since 1995 by Congress. That provision forbids funding "research in which" human embryos (whether initially created for research purposes or not) are harmed or destroyed outside the womb.(1) National Institutes of Health guidelines approved by the Clinton Administration nonetheless give researchers detailed instructions on how to obtain human embryos for destructive cell harvesting, if they wish to qualify for federal grants in "human pluripotent stem cell research."(2) Clearly, obtaining and destroying embryos is an integral part of this project, even if the specific act of destroying embryos does not directly receive federal funds. By implementing these guidelines, the federal government would encourage researchers to conduct destructive embryo experiments that are punishable as felonies in some states.(3)

 

This proposal is immoral because it violates a central tenet of all civilized codes on human experimentation beginning with the Nuremberg Code: It approves doing deadly harm to a member of the human species solely for the sake of potential benefit to others. The embryos to be destroyed by researchers in this campaign are at the same stage of development as embryos in the womb who have been protected as human subjects in federally funded research since 1975.(4) President Clinton's National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) and its 1994 predecessor, the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel, conceded that the early human embryo is a form of developing human life that deserves our respect(5). Treating human life as mere research material is no way to show respect.

 

Finally, this proposal is unnecessary because adult stem cells and other alternatives are already achieving some of the goals for which embryonic stem cells have been proposed, and new clinical uses are constantly being...

Find Another Essay On The Stem Cell Debate is Not About Medical Benefits

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research

2325 words - 9 pages The Moral Debate over Stem Cell Research President George W. Bush looked stern and confident as he addressed the American people on August 9th, 2001. It was an historic day for the 43rd president, as he explained the debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research, including its possible benefits for science but also its problems surrounding morals and ethics. “The issue is debated within the church, with people of different faiths, even

The Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research

1280 words - 5 pages .  Also, stem cell research can be used to test new drugs and help people who need organ transplants by replacing bad tissue and muscle cells.  Scientists go about this by taking stem cells and fusing them through a catheter in the area where it is needed.  Stem cell research can potentially save a lot of lives, but not without extensive research.  The problem with this is that the government has to approve of the research to fund these kinds of

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research

859 words - 3 pages intrigue me, but not to the point as to where I would make a career of it. I think that stem cell research is a really great idea because it saves people’s lives. After hearing both sides of debates I have to say the research being done is good because of the progress and the advances it can bring to the medical community.      In the articles I have read on this very controversial debate on whether stem cells should be destroyed or used for

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research

803 words - 3 pages Inside an embryo there are dozens of stem cells. They are basically empty shells, but the special thing about them is that they are pluripotent, meaning that they can develop in to any cell or organ in human body. That makes stem cell research a gigantic part of today’s medical research. With enough research, stem cells can be a big help to the human kind. Their extraordinary abilities could help scientists return memory to Alzheimer’s patients

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research - 1136 words

1136 words - 5 pages greatest happiness principle, has had a large share in forming the moral doctrines even of those who most scornfully reject its authority.” However, other people feel happiness is not merely what occurs to us, but, rather how we deal with our circumstances. This brings us to the controversial position on stem cell research. Scientists want to do research on aborted embryos or fertilized human embryos left over from medical procedures, such as

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research - 1274 words

1274 words - 5 pages well as the most controversial aspect of the research; the embryonic stem cell. This has much of the nation in an uproar because of ethical and moral views on the situation at hand. Many feel that embryos should be considered human beings and should not be destroyed for the causes of medical science. Therefore these groups and political figures are most definitely holding back the process of finding cures and helping to distract scientists from

The Great Stem Cell Research Debate

1498 words - 6 pages difficult, but sometimes you don't deal with the same things you would if you were a doctor.One of the biggest controversies still in debate in the medical field is that of stem-cell research. Debates about the ethical and social limits of medical science are becoming an everyday thing. Of course, the fear that medical science is moving too fast and into areas where it doesn't belong is not new. The current pace of scientific discovery seems to

The Great Stem Cell Research Debate

1497 words - 6 pages difficult, but sometimes you don't deal with the same things you would if you were a doctor.One of the biggest controversies still in debate in the medical field is that of stem-cell research. Debates about the ethical and social limits of medical science are becoming an everyday thing. Of course, the fear that medical science is moving too fast and into areas where it doesn't belong is not new. The current pace of scientific discovery seems to

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research - 1470 words

1470 words - 6 pages affect health care and my future studies if I chose to pursue medical research in graduate school, is critical. Unfortunately, having not had the occasion to do my own research on the subject, I feel this assignment presents the perfect opportunity (and encouragement) to explore the area. First isolated in 1998, stem cells are the body’s clay, having the potential to become any type of cell. Stem cells are divided into two classes - adult and

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research - 1002 words

1002 words - 4 pages correct the errors that cause these medical conditions. A stem cell is a primitive type of cell that can be coaxed into developing into most of the 220 types of cells found in the human body (e.g. blood cells, heart cells, brain cells, etc). Some researchers regard them as offering the greatest potential for the alleviation of human suffering since the development of antibiotics. Over 100 million Americans suffer from diseases that may eventually be

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research - 2739 words

2739 words - 11 pages year that the implications of his work should not be overstated and that he himself supports funding both embryonic and adult stem cell research. However, medical and patient groups have now tilted the pendulum so far toward outright denial of the facts about the promise of adult stem cell research that Dr. Prockop recently felt obliged to correct the record. Responding to an article that questioned the benefits of adult stem cells, he notes

Similar Essays

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research 1246 Words

1246 words - 5 pages Stem Cell Research Should stem cell research be allowed? Stem cell research has been a major biological breakthrough in recent years. It has great potential to help people and ease suffering. But there is also a moral question raised about stem cell research, and that comes from the source of stem cells. Ever since Stem Cell research started, there has been much debate over whether or not it should be allowed. Some

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research 2372 Words

2372 words - 9 pages , religious, legal and medical values and belief. These form the basis of the debate as to whether or not it is humane and ethical to destroy even one embryo for the advance of the sciences and the benefit of millions. However there is an alternative method of stem cell research which makes use of adult stem cells that are found throughout the body, including in bone marrow and hair follicles. Robert Hoffman, of the American medical research company

The Heated Debate Concerning Stem Cell Research

3493 words - 14 pages the delays in research funding are harming patients who could eventually be treated by therapies based on embryonic stem cells. Mid-July 1999: The White House releases a statement saying the administration "recognizes that human stem-cell technology’s potential medical benefits are compelling and worthy of pursuit, so long as the research is conducted according to the highest ethical standards."14 The report does oppose the federal funding of

The Debate Concerning Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1515 words - 6 pages embryonic stem cell research. Those opposed to embryonic stem cell research argue that the potential benefits of such research do not justify the termination of a young human life. There is no question, they say, that even at the blastocyst stage a young human embryo is a form of human life. Therefore, opponents argue, as a human life, embryos possess the same rights and are thus entitled to the same protections as are afforded to other human