The absurd play “Waiting for Godot” which was written by Samuel Beckett after the Second World War in French. This play was the first play which was so absurd so preposterous for the public that the name “Theatre of Absurd” was coined to classify such plays and drama. The play was first performed in a small theatre in Paris 1953 it was quite farce because of the low comedy and the absurd situations it gave the public. This public greatly countenanced the play and soon the work or rather say the play was translated in English by Beckett Himself. The fact that makes the play Waiting for Godot so unique is its absurdity and incongruity to the audience or the readers; it partially displays it absurdity through the uncertainty of the truth told at many instances throughout the play. There is no explicit end to the play, and this leaves the reader and audience spurious towards the end of the play.
The scintillate in the play is not only lit up by its absurdity, but the aspect of truth that the playwright addendum to the play. The play can be classified as a vehicle which is driven by lack of truth or in the words of simple reader or the audience the truth in this play is quite uncertain. Being uncertain of the consequences which the character claims so be the reason of why they act in such less meaningful and capricious way. While the presence of truth is objective or say detached from the play, at every instance each statement is brought to be questioned in the audiences or the reader’s mind even common labels such as the color, time, and names become dogmatic and chimerical.
In an Article by Misty Jones the perspective of Anurag Sharma for the play written by Beckett. Here Anurag Sharma says that “Truth Is Subjective” he claims that the truth is really unrealistic and uncertain. This statement about the play is neither lacking the verity nor lacking the prim. Beckett's truth in the play is more than subjective rather than objective; it is fundamentally uncertain throughout the whole play. Godot either exists or he does not. Since Beckett never introduces the character of Godot in both the acts of the play, the readers never come to know if Godot truly exists or not. Also, Vladimir and Estragon search for proof of their own existence many a times taking help of their consciousness as to commemorate the past and to remember the relationship they have with other characters in the play but neither method is helpful to provide them with confidence as to who they are in this world around them, a clear epitome for this is shown in the second act when Vladimir and Estragon meet Lucky and Pozzo for a second time. They are not sure if they had met Pozzo and lucky the day before, but show glimpses in their memory of meeting Pozzo and Lucky the day before. This shows that truth is an uncertainty in the play. This also shows that time is an important factor that affects truth being an uncertainty in the play.
The time is imprecise as there is no era or eon...