“Remaking the World after the First World War”
The Treaty of Versailles and the Problem of Peace.
It was in Paris after the World War I that the conference to make peace that will surpass all other ones were done. The mind of man just at the start of the World War I was still much more the same today especially with respect to attitudes like bigotry, narrow-mindedness and idealism to mention a few. The making of peace is not cheap and from the attitude or perspective that the only way out is to win so as not to lose makes the whole system of war ruthless.1 David A. Andelman and Margaret Macmillan agreed that at the peace conference issues at stake were of such that individual nation represented want to know the way out of the war before anarchy was capitulated, but also to gain an upper hand on the victims or less privileged of war. Considering individuals like the prime ministers of Britain and that of France, Clemenceau and David Lloyd George respectively, with their main decisions as when can they make the war to end? But this cannot be materialised without the British ships or men of France.
David A. Andelman claims accordingly it is just the big Four Allied forces that divide the rest of the wounded, maimed and rejected after the great war. They were callous, brutal and left the losers more impoverished so that they can divide the spoil of war among themselves.1 Against Macmillian, ibid Adelman ibid2 believed there is the big four and not three comprises of Italy, Britain, France and America. The failure of the great power are so obvious that the generation of Thailand to the remotest part in the world does not give a good view of the powers of the shattered peace. From Asia to the Middle East to the other parts of Europe, there are signs of the omission or commission of evil. When they can divide the Ottoman empire so that the Emirate or Kings of the other parts of Africa will never contend with France or Britain. But seeds of hatred was sown in Versailles around 1919. It was cool in Paris, but not in Iraq, not in Arab world and not in minority cities of Europe. Is it not an evil that we need to curtail, but alas we are reaping the discord now, with the threats of terrorism. ibid Even Woodrow Wilson knows the world power has come to divide the spoils of war and not for peace because he stated it. Oh what a soul of the big four!
How to decide the hero of the Great war is one that need to be considered in a broad manner with a flat spectrum view. So the peace conference in a way though confined and defined by the amount of contemporary information or resources available needed to find peace for the wounded nation as well as for the winning nations.2 Oh can we count them as innocent? No we cannot.
In the events of 1919, the plots are such that three important leaders of the world from Britain, America and France need to use the best of all their knowledge as they are considered the best to give the required quick fix.2 David Lloyd...