This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Theory Of Knowledge Essay

1136 words - 5 pages

The methods that available in the production of knowledge are limited by the ethical judgments, but the definition of whether the method is ethical or not depends on a couple different things. The first one is the personal judgments. Each person would have different judgments for the same method. However, one personal based judgment cannot be universal. The second one is the social judgment. It is related to the personal judgment. When a personal opinion for a method is agreed by most of people in the society, this opinion would become a social judgment.
One example of ethical limits on natural science is the drug test. Human uses animals to test whether the new drugs are safe or not – which some people think is not ethical to do so. The judgments of the drug test are also divided into two opposite schools: the first school states that any animal test would be unethical; the other school thinks that competing to the benefits the animal tests have on human being, it is ethical.
I personally agree with the second school. As I said, my personal judgment cannot represent a universal judgment, but let’s assume this theory is true. According to the statement “it is ethical because it has bigger benefits on human being”, what used to judge something is ethical or not is the value of benefit it produces. Logically, this means if one ethical issue can have profits that are way bigger than the ethical issue, this issue would be ethical. I know that it sounds ridiculous, but it is true if you think about it. Go back to the drug test example, when a new medicine which can save hundreds of human’s life comes out, who would care about the death of a couple laboratory rats? You may argue with me: “it is because the life of a couple laboratory rats is not that important.” As I said, if anything can have profits that are way bigger than the ethical issue, it could be ethical. One example is the famous paradox: there is a bomb hidden somewhere in a city that is big enough to kill everyone in the city. The police caught a criminal who knows where the bomb is. However, this criminal will not say anything unless the police torture him. We know that torture is a very unethical action, but if you were the police, would you torture him? I believe that most of you would say yes. Compete to thousands of life; a torture seems not that important. I can still give you more examples about this if you want.
Again, what I explained above is my personal judgment but not universal judgment. Nevertheless, if most number of the people in the society agrees with me, then my judgment would be a social judgment. Most of people think about things by using mathematical measuring judgment, so this judgment is more or less universal as a social judgment. That is also the reason why we still have animal tests now.
I consider ethic and math is somehow related – they are both about number. This is true in the nature science area. Ethical judgment is like an inequality equation: on the...

Find Another Essay On Theory of Knowledge Essay

Theory of Knowledge Essay

1219 words - 5 pages supported the Copernican theory (that the Earth and all the planets move around the sun). Galileo was tortured and excommunicated, although his theory was correct.The question of morals is often used in scientific arguments over whether or not knowledge should be sought, as seen recently with the debate over genetic engineering. Such an approach shows a backward view to science, similar to the persecution of the supporters of Copernicus by the

The Theory of Knowledge Essay

1671 words - 7 pages know whether Olber’s paradox was due to other unexplained phenomena of physics and must therefore require the development of knew knowledge to disprove it. The knowledge shown to be wrong by Olber however was proven to be wrong in Einstein’s ‘Theory of General and Special Relativity’. Einstein showed that Newton’s model was impossible and that a different model would need to be found (which was found by Edwin Hubble in 1929). Einstein proved the

The Theory of Knowledge

1686 words - 7 pages many hypotheses and theories, such as Newton’s laws of physics and the Big Bang theory this often leads to the subject knowledge being further built upon and evolved. Although Scientific claims and hypotheses are frequently discarded, they can also be slightly altered to make them not false. Most frequently in the natural sciences, if theories have taken hold and are proven to be false, they may be replaced by a theory that simply changed minor

Plato's Theory of Knowledge

1276 words - 5 pages Plato's Theory of Knowledge Plato's Theory of Knowledge is very interesting. He expresses this theory with three approaches: his allegory of The Cave, his metaphor of the Divided Line and his doctrine The Forms. Each theory is interconnected; one could not be without the other. Here we will explore how one relates to the other. In The Cave, Plato describes a vision of shackled prisoners seated in a dark cave facing the wall

Theory of Knowledge

1665 words - 7 pages life, or in my case, the topic questions. I used to believe that the topic questions are all identical because I only depended on my memory to ensure that I can solve them. In this essay, I will investigate two tools that aid us in the process of corroboration. Firstly, I will be looking at how the strong faith we have always had and still have for what the authorities publicize can act as a tool to determine what we accept as knowledge in society

Theory of Knowledge

706 words - 3 pages because information may or may not be processed into knowledge depending on the situation. Think of someone entirely new to biology. How would someone know how the skeletal system works? Reading about it in theory is only one side of the system. If, however, a student takes an existing skeleton apart and learns about the different roles and functions played by each physical component, in time, the student will know enough about them and their

The Theory of Knowledge

1781 words - 7 pages . Hindsight allows for predictions based on the past, a theory vindicated by history sometimes repeating itself. For example, there were clear similarities between the causes of the two World Wars, such as feelings of being wronged that prompted belligerence; the belief in pre-emptive action to prevent invasion and that war would distract the populace with nationalism. In history, knowledge in the past was rejected, but not discarded. All

Theory of Knowledge : Logic

1311 words - 5 pages Theory of Knowledge07 February 2012How can beliefs affect our capacity to reason well and to recognize valid arguments? Can they affect a person's capacity to distinguish between fallacy, good argument and rationalization? What is the difference between a rational argument and a rationalization?Reasoning is known as the process of forming conclusions, judgments, and inferences from facts or premises ("reasoning"). Being able to reason is a trait

John Locke's Theory of Knowledge

2440 words - 10 pages I. General Notions Francis Bacon and Thomas Hobbes were not truly conscious of the phenomenalistic consequences of their theory of knowledge, which was based on empiricism. Both considered sensation as phenomenal presentations and also as representations of reality. Thus they still had something upon which to build an absolute metaphysics. With Locke gnosiological phenomenalism enters its critical phase. By considering sensations merely as

John Locke's Theory of Knowledge

1554 words - 6 pages John Locke (1632-1704) was the first of the classical British empiricists. (Empiricists believed that all knowledge derives from experience. These philosophers were hostile to rationalistic metaphysics, particularly to its unbridled use of speculation, its grandiose claims, and its epistemology grounded in innate ideas) If Locke could account of all human knowledge without making reference to innate ideas, then his theory would be simpler

Plato's Theory of Human Knowledge

910 words - 4 pages Plato's Theory of Human Knowledge Plato contended that all true knowledge is recollection. He stated that we all have innate knowledge that tells us about the things we experience in our world. This knowledge, Plato believed, was gained when the soul resided in the invisible realm, the realm of The Forms and The Good. Plato's theory of The Forms argued that everything in the natural world is representative of the ideal of that form. For

Similar Essays

Theory Of Knowledge Essay

1245 words - 5 pages grows everyday but does not necessarily change every day. The areas of knowledge that will be discussed in this essay are natural and human sciences. In History we can see that at one point something that was considered knowledge then transformed into different knowledge, especially in the natural sciences. However, in the past, due to lack of technology, it might have been more of a lack of knowledge that then turned into knowledge on the topic

Theory Of Knowledge Essay

1246 words - 5 pages This essay will be considering the question: to what extent can history and the natural sciences be used to understand the relationship between common belief and truth? Looking at the natural sciences this can be seen through the disproof and refinement of human theories. Through the lens of history ideas and ideals held by the majority can or cannot be as they are perceived. Looking at history and the natural sciences one can see that

Theory Of Knowledge Essay

1067 words - 5 pages The knowledge available is sometimes limited by ethical judgments but it depends on each human being how much would that knowledge could be limited for both natural sciences and arts depending on the aims and focuses that the scientist, artist or viewer on it respective case if the morals and ethical judgments of supposed person are against something this person will never dig into it however there is people that think different, were rose

Ib Theory Of Knowledge Essay

1654 words - 7 pages /Primum_non_nocere [Accessed: December 2, 2009]Conformity studies: http://scienceaid.co.uk/psychology/social/majority.html [Accessed: September 20, 2009]Scientific method: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method [Accessed: December 2, 2009]Cubism: http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/ent/A0857656.html [Accessed: December 2, 2009]Confirmation bias: http://skepdic.com/confirmbias.html [Accessed: September 20, 2009]Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diplima 2005, Cambridge, p. 238