Theory X And Theory Y Essay

2202 words - 9 pages

McGregor (1960) described two views on human motivation: Theory X and Y. Theory X, the more conventional one, holds the view that people are in themselves not intrinsically motivated to work and even attempt to avoid it, that people have no ambition, are resistant to change, are not particularly intelligent and that people only work for money and security. Management’s objective is to direct employees efforts, motivating them, controlling them and modifying their behavior to ensure that they behave in line with the organization’s needs and goals.
In contrast, Theory Y holds the view that work can be child’s play. People are committed, can work autonomous and still reach their work objectives, act responsible and are creative in fulfilling their tasks and dealing with problems. In principle, Theory X and Y are managerial theories, they reflect the propositions managers hold about their subordinates. Typical Theory X management is the traditional management style. Table 1 summarizes the underlying assumptions of both theories.
In this essay Theory X and Y are perceived as two ends of one continuum, this means that every individual holds both Theory X and Y- motivation attitudes, but the extent to which these theories prevail within individuals differ. As described in later developed economic agency theory, management driven by theory X assumptions (X management) needs to control behavior very strictly. The agent and principal have a conflict of interest and therefore agency of the agent is needed. Management driven by theory Y assumptions (Y management) would argue that employees need to be motivated by offering opportunities to satisfy their personal needs and by trusting the agent to fulfill their tasks correctly.
Theory X Theory Y
The average human is by nature indolent- he works as little as possible. The average human is not by nature passive or resistant to organizational needs. He may become so as a result of experience in organizations
He lacks ambition, dislikes responsibility, prefers to be led. He wants to actualize himself and strives for self-fulfillment.
He is inherently self-centered, indifferent to organizational needs. The motivation, the potential for development, the capacity for assuming the responsibility, the readiness to direct behavior toward organizational goals are all present in the average man.
He is by nature resistant to change. He is not by nature resistant when is safety needs are secured.
He is gullible, not very bright, the ready dupe of the charlatan and the demagogue
Table 1

System X----Y
Johnson (1972) translates the ideas of McGregor into the structural setting of an organization. In his view Theory X- motivation corresponds with a X-system within organizations. The same holds for Theory Y, which corresponds with a Theory Y- structure. He stated that a feeling of dissonance is created in the worker when he is working under X-system conditions. According to him a worker is culturally...

Find Another Essay On Theory X and Theory Y

Theory Y vs. Theory X Essay

786 words - 3 pages After taking a quick quiz, it would seem that I prefer the environment created by a Theory Y management style. Theory Y is the most predominately used method of management. This theory has gone through a few transformations since McGregor first wrote about his X and Y theories in the early 60's. I think that companies have realized that managing people like robots does not promote a sense of ownership among employees and eventually diminishes

Theory X & Y Essay

642 words - 3 pages Ron's want to join the AP computers (AP) can offer:better career prospectsbig companyhandled international projectshe would excel in his position at APMcGregor related employee motivation to the style of management. He categorized employee behavior into two types - Theory X and Theory Y. Theory Y employees seemed to like work, were eager to please and worked hard on their own initiative. McGregor suggested that employee behavior was the result

Theory X and Theory Y: Two Theories of Management

636 words - 3 pages Untitled Theory X and Theory Y: Two Theories of Management Theory X and Theory Y are theories of human motivation. These theories were developed by Douglas McGregor in the 1960s at the MIT Sloan School of Management. Theory X assumes that employees are lazy and will try to avoid work, therefore needing to be closely monitored at all times and a strict management system. Theory Y states that employees are self-motivated and if

Influence of McGregor's Theory X and Y on Time Management

806 words - 3 pages Influence of McGregor's Theory X and Y on time management Role theories suggest people take on various roles within their organizations which shape the individuals behaviors to meet the organizations goals and expectations (Colorado State University-Global Campus, 2013). McGregor’s Theory X and Y managerial assumptions seek to explain the role of managers in organizations and how their managerial views influence key business decisions

A Brief Introduction to Theory X and Y

775 words - 3 pages A Brief Introduction to Theory X and YMcGregor related employee motivation to the style of management. He categorized employee behavior into two types - Theory X and Theory Y. Theory X employees are categorized as lazy and unmotivated and only worked when forced to and never worked hard. By contrast Theory Y employees seemed to like work, were eager to please and worked hard on their own initiative. McGregor suggested that employee behavior was

Motivating Employees with Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, X/Y Theory and Expectancy and Contingency Theory

1105 words - 4 pages ;2. the rewards are desirable;3. the task obtains the desired outcome; and4. better performance most likely will bring greater rewards. (Peak, 2007, p. 52)B. Building on McGregor's (X/Y Theory) and Herzberg's (Hygiene/Maintenance) motivational theories, Morse and Lorsch relate the contingency theory proposing that people need to build on a sense of competence, to be competent in their work; but that tasks requiring structure and organization are

Common Management Theories: Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs theory and Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y

1287 words - 5 pages During the 1950's early management theorist, Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs theory and Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y, represented a period in the development of motivation concepts. A comparative review sets a foundation for practicing managers, who chose regularly to use their terminologies in explaining employee motivation. Even though these theories are now heavily disputed and there validity called into question, they are

Theory Y

972 words - 4 pages Theory X and Theory Y are two theories developed by Douglas M. McGregor. They are often compared and contrasted however, for the purposes of this paper the primary focus will be on Theory Y. It is important to note the differences between the two theories to understand why Theory Y is thought to be superior. McGregor was intrigued by what motivated people to work hard and how leaders could foster their motivation (Bobic and Davis, 2003, p

Theory X

2035 words - 8 pages 1 30 24 Introductory Pysics M 1 36 24 20 Modern Physics M 1 36 25 Wave Physics Y 2 18 22 10 Electromagnetic field theory Y Y 2 36 40 Electromagnetic field theory I I 3 26 18 Electromagnetism D 2 28 20 Engineering Mechanics D D 2 44 26 4 Modern Physics I 3 36 Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics Y 3 30 18 Modern Physics Y Y 3 42 34 Specialized courses, mainly aimed at the profiles "Applied Physics" and "Physical Electronics".Year Lecture

Motivation Theory X

4369 words - 17 pages , and he has formulated two models which he calls Theory X and Theory Y. Theory X Assumptions The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he can. Because of their dislike for work, most people must be controlled and threatened before they will work hard enough. The average human prefers to be directed, dislikes responsibility, is unambiguous, and desires security above everything. These assumptions lie behind

X-Bar Syntax and Its Contribution to the Linguistic Theory

2229 words - 9 pages X-Bar Syntax and Its Contribution to the Linguistic Theory 'X-bar syntax, as a theory of phrase structure grammar, makes a significant contribution to both the descriptive and the explanatory adequacy of Linguistic Theory.' The aim of a theory of language is to describe a speaker's linguistic competence. (Class notes) In order for a grammar to be satisfactory it must satisfy two main conditions: descriptive adequacy and explanatory

Similar Essays

Theory X And Theory Y Essay

1225 words - 5 pages Theory X and Theory Y, developed by Douglas McGregor, grew out of opposition towards classical management methods. Classical management theorists, such as Fredrick Taylor, focused on scientific training and efficiency and did not account for personal and behavioral issues, such as management styles or job satisfaction. McGregor saw these deficiencies in the classical school of management which lead him to develop a theory of management that

Mc Gregor’s Theory X And Theory Y

1113 words - 4 pages McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y Introduction Human beings have been studied systematically and objectively for many years to determine if they are resistant to work or self-governing. In addition, managers who tend to utilize McGregor’s Theory X generally receive poor results from their employees. This report essay will address McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y in contrasts to include how these theories benefit the criminal justice system

Douglas Mc Gregor’s Theory X And Theory Y

770 words - 3 pages Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y Biography of Douglas McGregor Douglas McGregor was born on 1906 in Detroit, America. In 1895, it was here that his grandfather, Thomas McGregor started his business and given its name as, McGregor Institute. The business provides assistance to Great Lakes sailors and other transient labour. The Institute provided shelter, warmth and food to approximately 100 men every year. When Thomas McGregor

Theory X And Theory Y Leadership Model

1381 words - 6 pages The Keller Case Paper describes Wolfgang Keller and the way he is trying to turn around the Konigsbrau-Hellas beer company subsidiary in Greece. In this paper, the leadership style that Keller was effective in using as well as the business concepts that made him an effective leader will be further explained. The leadership model that is being chosen in this paper is the Theory X and Theory Y Leadership model and how to compare the two