Third Party Intervention In Civil Conflict

1194 words - 5 pages

Third Party Intervention in Civil Conflict
Struggles involving civil wars and violence far outnumber those dealing with external aggression and conflict, especially in today’s society. These internal conflicts over identity, territory, and government are more difficult to resolve through peaceful negotiation, creating an augmented sense of collective responsibility to acknowledge. If handled incorrectly, the situation may worsen, causing tension and (possibly) execution. The use of third parties (military intervention) in civil conflict often creates national distress, reeking havoc and tremendous costs upon assisting nations.
One cost of military intervention is a rise in anti-American sentiment, freshly evident in Somalia. When United States Marines made their landing in Mogadishu eight years ago, the Somalis greeted them with acclaim. One year later, eighteen Americans died at the hands of the Somalis. Hatred of the United States was apparent, particularly in the published photo of content Somalis dragging an American corpse through the streets (Kressel 187). The gruesome scene triggered the U.S. to withdraw troops. Despite the apparent goodwill at the beginning of the assignment, American engagement was widely resented once they became part of the war. The intervention had created a threat to U.S. interests where there had previously been none.
Comparable ill will greeted United States soldiers when they attempted to land in Haiti in 1994. Based on preceding attempts to influence Haiti's domestic affairs, such as withholding of financial aid in crude attempts to influence Haiti's domestic affairs, the U.S. should have expected Haitian resistance (Kressel 122). Faced with violent opposition to the American presence, the Clinton Administration proscribed the ships to turn around and dismiss the original plan-landing the ships so that third party "peacekeeping" could take place. This fear of confrontation by the most powerful country in the world, the United States, did significant damage to American credibility (Kressel 123).
Interventionism also jeopardizes U.S. vital interests in other ways. The most obvious hazard is to the lives of American soldiers sent into the conflict. Once troops have been deployed, it becomes a critical interest to ensure their security. If they are in danger or if troops have been taken hostage, the United States has a responsibility to protect them. It was for that reason that President Clinton declared March 31, 1994, as the date for withdrawal from Somalia and, at the same time, took what appeared to be the contradictory action of sending thousands of additional troops to Mogadishu (Snyder 24). To guarantee the security of the troops already there, auxiliary forces had to be deployed. Again, the intervention threatened the interests of the United States.
Pointless interventions also waste the public’s espousal for military operations. Failed missions produce tremendous cynicism about future...

Find Another Essay On Third Party Intervention in Civil Conflict

How significant are third party candidates in US Presidential Elections?

718 words - 3 pages When the Republican Party's candidate, Abraham Lincoln, won the presidency in 1860, his was a minor party. Now, of course, it's one of our two main parties. But there are and have been many "third parties". Anti-Masons, Free-Soilers, Know-Nothings, Prohibitionists, Populists, Socialists, Communists, States' Righters and Libertarians-- they've all nominated candidates for president in the past.America currently have five nationally organised

Importance of Third Party Political Organizations in the US

852 words - 4 pages political parties such as Libertarian Party that have ideas on how to save the economy and reform social security. Third party political organizations are an important part of the United States government. One of the major issues that the Constitution Party is currently against is gun control. In order to support their disagreement with the policy they call upon the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which preserves citizens of the United States

This paper is an analytical essay on the US intervention in the Iraqi conflict

1642 words - 7 pages On March 19, 2003, after much debate and protest, the United States began Operation Iraqi Freedom. What was originally intended to be a swift, effective liberation of the Iraqi people has become a drawn-out, controversial conflict. Now, the coalition is faced with many new and pressing decisions. As the hostility intensifies in the Middle East, people in many nations are asking why the United States is still in Iraq. The thin line between

The Negative Consequences of the US Intervention in the Guatemalan Civil War

1916 words - 8 pages late Hugo Chavez are the product of this. US intervention was absolutely and unquestionably very important in the Guatemalan Civil War. It was a strategic failure, inciting only violence and repression of rights and anti-American sentiments. Today, venturing to Guatemala, we see visible scars of the conflict upon society, and of the significant US insertion into Guatemalan affairs. Bibliography 1 Ortega, Gaytán Jorge Antonio. Los Kaibiles

Why did the Chinese Communist Party Win the Civil War in 1949?

1297 words - 5 pages The Chinese Civil War, which lasted from 1927 to 1949, was a civil war in China which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) overthrew the Guomindang (GMD) . As the CCP had always been inferior to the GMD in many aspects, many were shocked and startled by the Communist's victory; although numerous factors show that the Communist's victory was almost inevitable. This essay will examine the factors that lead to the Communists victory, which includes

American civil liberties are defined as civil rights designed with the purpose of limiting government intervention in citizen’s affairs (Civil Lib

1113 words - 5 pages American civil liberties are defined as civil rights designed with the purpose of limiting government intervention in citizen’s affairs (Civil Liberties 1). After the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, the United States government enacted new policies that did not universally coincide with the civil liberties Americans are guaranteed. Several of the new procedures enacted were unnecessary and caused average

The World Of The 20th Century

1007 words - 5 pages , which led to many conflicts within the country, like the Soviet-Afghan war, after the intervention of the Mujahedeen. Meanwhile in China at the end of World War Two, a civil war broke out between Sheks nationalist party and the Chinese communist party. Eventually it led to the upbringing of Mao and his cultural revolution that also caused conflict within the country. At the end of the war, in august 1945, Japan surrender, this gave Ho Chi Man his

Foreign decision making

1797 words - 7 pages third parties, with particular stress on two interrelated points. The first point is to identify and analyze the various roles that international third parties may play and the criteria needed for success in each of these different roles. The second point is the specific international actors that have either played or have the potential to play third party roles in ethnic conflict resolution.In Kaufmann's When All Else Fail: Ethnic Population

Humanitarian Intervention

1842 words - 7 pages leader and that he is not within his scope of legitimacy in his policy. Had such intervention been used in the US Civil War, the USA may be a very different place today. The reasoning here is simply that the Western thought is not necessarily the 'right' thought. China and India represent a third of the world's population and they do not subscribe to interfering in other nations personal matters. The legitimacy of the will of the world's

Outsiders Cannot Bring Peace To A Civil Conflict

1187 words - 5 pages soviet troops invaded Afghanistan. These troops fought for almost 10 years against the "Western-backed Islamic groups" (Isachenkov 2). The soviet troops withdrew in 1989, but the communist regime in Kabul.Russian intervention did nothing to prevent further killing. Both conflicts were not solved directly or indirectly by an outside force. Although having a civil conflict solved by a third party is possible, it is shown by the last two situations

France and the Spanish Civil War

2685 words - 11 pages During the Spanish Civil War, France decided on a policy of Non-Intervention in order to promote economic and political stability. Firstly, the Non-Intervention policy kept France from having a financial stake in the war, which they would have should they have supported one side over the other, and was in fact financially beneficial as it allowed France to trade with both sides of the Spanish Civil War without difficulties. In addition, since

Similar Essays

Cost Benefit Analysis Of Third Party Intervention In Intrastate Conflict


Third Party Conflict Resolution – Sick Leave

1517 words - 6 pages Third Party Conflict Resolution – Sick Leave The case of sick leave involved Kelly, who was hired by Soto Board of Education in Japan. Her employment was with The Japan Exchange and Teaching Program (JET) and Conference of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) had taken over the contracts for the workers of JET. CLAIR’s role was to be a liaison during recruiting and selection, counseling and participant welfare. Their main

Third Party (3 Pl) Logistics In India

2165 words - 9 pages logistic service shows the great changes towards success. So in research we try to determine, the various key success factors in the Indian 3PL industry. Third-party logistics (3PL) is a service that refers to the performance of one or more than one logistics activities like transportation, warehousing, production, information, various cost, planning and service and other logistics associated activities like packaging, inspection, security which

The Effect Of Third Party Candidates In Presidental Elections

1478 words - 6 pages The Effect of Third Party Candidates in Presidental Elections Although citizens of the United States have the opportunity to vote for many different offices at the national, state, and local levels, the election of the president of the United States every four years is the focal point of the American political process. The American political system has maintained a two- party system since its inception. Political scientists argue that a two