This House Would Abolish Nuclear Weapons

731 words - 3 pages

This House would Abolish Nuclear Weapons

The abolishment of nuclear weapons has been an ongoing argument since the bombing of Hiroshima. Although this motion is strongly agreed on, not all countries have signed a worldwide treaty to ensure the use of nuclear weapons is prohibited. A nuclear weapon can be used to destroy a large are of space with an explosion that is larger than any other bomb on the planet. The splitting of two extremely reactive elements causes a nuclear explosion.

Have you ever thought of nuclear weapons being a threat to you? If you have never taken this into consideration; think again. Yet some people believe nuclear weapons should not be abolished and therefore every ...view middle of the document...

As this would cause more power stations to be built, there would be higher chance of radiation leakage that would cause civilians to flee their homes if there was a chance they would be exposed to this. This relates to the most recent nuclear disaster that occurred in Fukushima. This occurred when a Japanese nuclear plant had an earthquake occur in close proximity, soon after this earthquake damaged the station, a 15 meter tsunami also hit the power plant causing important areas to be destroyed and to leak radiation. I also believe that the encouragement of building these bombs would lead to countries challenging each other to see who can build the most dangerous bombs and possibly the most dangerous bomb on the planet.

My third and final point is the horrific and threatening reality of the risk of nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands. You may think it impossible for a terrorist or criminal to obtain a nuclear weapon, but in this day and age it is not very difficult to build one of these weapons, in fact the most difficult part is...

Find Another Essay On This House would Abolish Nuclear Weapons

Weapons of Mass Destruction Are Bad

2261 words - 9 pages go to war (Juilet). Weapons of mass destruction can be a good negotiation tool (Juilet). There is no nation that would want to argue or have conflicts with other nations that have access to nuclear weapons (Juilet). They also can bring political power to a nation (Juilet). “A country that owns nuclear weapons is feared and respected.” No one wants to see another Hiroshima happen”(Juilet).They can also bring great pride to a nation. “Nuclear

Nuclear Weapon testing Essay

2834 words - 11 pages Research Project:Should Nuclear Weapon Testing Still Exist?Nuclear ControversyThe United States made a secret military project called the "Manhattan Project" and developed its first atomic bomb called "Trinity" at the Alamogordo Test Range, on the Jornada del Muerto desert in New Mexico on July 16, 1945 (Trinity). They created this project due to the fear of Nazi Germany would build and use their own collection of nuclear weapons against the

The Discontinuation of Nuclear Weaponry Creation

2076 words - 9 pages bring upon this peace. These men and women say that in order to get a reliable, nuclear-free world, the creation of a sovereign or nearly sovereign international power would be required to effectively manage and watch over worldwide security matters. The country would need to definitely be sovereign if the proposal included an entity to arm this international force with nuclear weapons. It can be concluded that a nuclear-free world would demand a

War and Nuclear Weapons

1052 words - 5 pages hears about the Cold War they usually only think about Russia and America fighting. In reality the Cold War was so intense that a third world war was possible. In 1962, the war between democracy and communism was at its peak. Russia moved their own ballistic missiles in to Cuba. This led to the Cuban Missile Crisis, a two week period that almost caused a full on nuclear warfare. Over the next 50 years more and more countries would obtain their

The Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

1524 words - 6 pages Introduction The emergence of nuclear weapons was brought about by distrust amongst states, following progress in nuclear research into uranium fission. Fearing that Germany would create a nuclear weapon first, the United States employed vast resources into nuclear research and developing the first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union followed by testing its first atomic bomb in 1949, thereby beginning a nuclear arms race amongst countries that

Nuclear Weaponry

1260 words - 5 pages . Radiation released from each step in the explosion of the nuclear bomb causes cancer, congenital defects, mental retardation, immune destruction, cancer, stillbirths and other health problems (“The Effects of Nuclear Weapons”). It has also been related that those who suffered a nuclear reaction more than a decade ago will still find genetic disorders and defects in upcoming generations. This can be observed through the Japanese population

After The Atomic Bomb

2536 words - 10 pages controlled by people. This created a worldwide anxiety of how this newly cast power could be used and changed how the world functions today. The atomic bombs may have resolved one conflict, but with that resolution arose many more. The controversy over nuclear weapons would soon take on a new meaning during the Cold War. Political Change in Thinking The Cold War between the capitalist, democratic Western powers and the Soviet Union was the center

This essay is an examination of two articles of the early atomic age

1128 words - 5 pages certainty of it, morally they are the same, and we have no choice but to address the issue of nuclear weapons as though we knew for a certainty that their use would put an end to our species. Nuclear weapons pose the greatest threat to the downfall of humanity and the complete destruction of the world; this complete disrespect for life is immoral.Nuclear weapons will constantly exist and spread. As more and more nations are arming themselves

Who influenced the conclusion of the cold war, Gorbachev or Reagan?

519 words - 2 pages economies. With this attempt at new ideas, Gorbachev made new rivals, Yeltsin and Ligachev. He visited Washington in December of 1987 to further discuss the removal of nuclear weapons, and agreed with Reagan on the INF treaty that would eliminate two categories of nuclear weapons. Reagan spoke to Gorbachev about opening up his society to free ideas and travel, and this fueled the human rights reform is the Soviet Union. After all of Gorbachev's

The Nuclear Posture Review: The Wrong Road to Security

3249 words - 13 pages commonly regarded allies) very uneasy (Norris).The development of new nuclear weapons is pushed in the NPR a policy which alone has the potential to disrupt decades of nuclear treaties (Norris, 3). New weapons would require as they normally do, testing to ensure actual effectiveness if any, and constancy. This would likely cause the total trashing of the CTBT. Secondly, the goal of NMD shield development is over ambitious to begin with, and

Atomic

726 words - 3 pages the potential exists in them to kill. And no matter what government regulations are put in place or how many peace treaties are signed the potential for global destruction still looms overhead. As well the use of nuclear weapons would place the world in a very ironic situation, they are the most powerful weapons on this planet, however if nuclear weapons are ever used in a full-blown war no one can win. As soon as a country launches a nuclear

Similar Essays

We Must Abolish Nuclear Weapons Essay

1799 words - 7 pages nuclear weapons, the nuclear bombs can create deadly radiation that damages the cells of humans and other living organisms, such as radiation sickness and sometimes death. People who survived nuclear attacks are found to have a greater chance of getting some kind of form of cancer. Scientist has theories/hypothesis that if a war happens and hundreds of nuclear bombs explode, the smoke created from fires would prevent sunlight from hitting earth

Reaons To Abolish Nuclear Weapons Essay

1565 words - 6 pages decades following the explosion. The events that took place at Hiroshima and Nagasaki are two undoubtable signs that banning nuclear weapons would be wholly beneficial. No one can ignore the travesty of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in which more than 100,000 people died, and that in both cases, the cities were totally leveled by the destructive force of the explosion (“National High”). In addition to this terror, Richard Garwin said, because of how

A Proposal For The International Elimination Of Nuclear Weapons

1729 words - 7 pages USA has used and still uses this to develop an argument for the need for intervention by the military to install defense missiles in Europe, particularly the Eastern part. As a result, Russia has made violent reactions that reflect the Cold War era. Thus, there is a possibility that the increase of nuclear weapons in other states may breed nuclear arms race among the world powers. The nuclear powers have not been serious in fulfilling their promise

Nuclear Weapon Funding In Us Defense Budget

2509 words - 10 pages Reduction in Nuclear Weapons, Web. May 2014). What took abroad from this budget is that there was a shortage of authority in trying to carry on the prioritization of the funding of the very issue, we are in retreat of this issue, and it’s a very bulky mistake. In fact the administration officials abolish the approach that the budget emulates a loss of affection on the issue. After all, President Obama spoke in his docket setting his 2009 visit to