This Paper Discusses The Evolution Of The Death Penalty In The Us And Arguments For And Against Its Application To Juveniles.

2218 words - 9 pages

The primary purpose of the juvenile justice system is to hold juvenile offenders accountable for delinquent acts while providing treatment, rehabilitation, and programs designed to prevent recidivism. Juvenile courts have recognized that there are developmental differences between adults and juveniles and advocated appropriate rehabilitative systems. However, with the passage of revised death penalty statutes and the increase in violent crimes, the juvenile justice system has seen a shift toward stronger policies and punishments. More juveniles are seeing their cases transferred to criminal courts. With this change, more youth capital offenders are subject to death penalty sentencing.Currently, 38 states authorize the death penalty and 23 of these will allow the execution of offenders who committed capital offenses prior to their eighteenth birthdays. In the seventeen years from when the death penalty was reinstated, 17 men were executed for crimes that they committed as juveniles. Currently, 83 people in the United States are on death row for crimes committed as juveniles.Debate about the use of the death penalty for juveniles has grown more intense because of the demand for harsher punishment for serious and violent juvenile offenders and challenges to the death penalty's legality. Proponents see the use of the death penalty as a deterrent against similar crimes or the most appropriate method for punishing certain severe crimes. Opponents believe that there is no deterrent factor, it is inherently cruel and the risk for wrongful conviction is too great.In this paper I will discuss the evolution of the death penalty and its application to juvenile offenders, justifications for sentencing juveniles to death row, and why proponents feel that there are other alternatives.In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the United States Supreme Court first defended the Constitutionality of the death penalty. The court established three criteria necessary to label a punishment as "cruel and unusual."> It is a punishment originally understood by the Framers of the Constitution to be cruel and unusual> There is societal consensus that the punishment offends civilized standards of human decency.> It is (1) grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime and (2) makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment.In Furman, Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was "arbitrarily and capriciously" applied under existing law. In 1973, in response to the decision, state began to revise their statutes to conform to the guidelines established by the Supreme Court. Gregg v. Georgia (1973), the Court found that the revised statutes did not violate the Eight Amendment when considering the follow stipulations:> In death penalty cases, the determination of guilt or innocence must be decided separately from hearings in which sentences of life imprisonment or death are decided> The court must consider aggravating and mitigating circumstances in...

Find Another Essay On This paper discusses the evolution of the death penalty in the US and arguments for and against its application to juveniles.

Capitol Punishment This paper discusses John Kavenough book and how the death penalty should be illegal

1916 words - 8 pages ?" Most of the criminals sentenced to death are done so as a punishment for murder. What is that saying to the world? The law is trying to show us that it is wrong to murder and if you do kill someone then they are going to kill you to show you how wrong it is.In John Kavanaugh's essay "Capital Punishment is Unjust", Kavanaugh discusses different reasons that we as a society may have for legally killing people by means of the death penalty. He

Arguments of the death penalty Essay

567 words - 2 pages Is death the justification of a murder or are we merely subduing ourselves by performing the same heinous act? This argument had been debated for many decades and although some feel that death is the answer to a murder, there are others that find it completely barbaric. Through a careful analysis between Edward Koch's "Death and Justice" and David Bruck's "The Death Penalty", I believe Koch had the better argument in claiming that death is the

Against the Death Penalty

1821 words - 7 pages has been reasonably effective in promoting and publicising protection of human rights, though there have been limits to its success in its actual protection. The US Supreme Court has held that the Eighth Amendment to the US Constitution (which forbids cruel and unusual punishment) does not prohibit capital punishment. However, the death penalty is available for the most serious crimes. Though, it cannot be imposed for

Against The Death Penalty

869 words - 3 pages University, believe that the death penalty actually hurts society and increases the chances of murder. There is lack of evidence that the death penalty is a deterrent. Some countries in Europe and Canada that do not have the death penalty have lower murder rates than the US, the same holds true for US states that do not have the death penalty.      There are many variables that go into deciding if a person will or will

Against The Death Penalty

984 words - 4 pages potential crimes, the death penalty inhibits the intolerance for murder of any kind. If it is against the law to take an individual's life, why should it be legal to strip a criminal of their humanity? It is erroneous of us to believe that a murderer's life is any less sacred than a victim's is. Even so, the National Research Council has concluded that studies claiming that the death penalty affects murder rates are "fundamentally flawed" because

Against the Death Penalty.

590 words - 2 pages . To kill someone is to end their life and... the rest is unknown. Why should we take the risk of taking an innocent life when we don't have too?One of the main reasons for keeping the death penalty established is that it reduces crime. Who knows why anyone would say this when many studies have shown the exact opposite. "The Ehrlich studies have been widely discredited. In fact, some criminologists, such as William Bowers of Northeastern University

Against The Death Penalty

1932 words - 8 pages capital punishment. Ancient Roman and Mosaic Law authorized the notion of revenge; they believed in the rule of "an eye for an eye" (Death, 57). Death penalty continued into the middle Ages when religious crimes such as sacrilege, heresy, and atheism were sentenced to death. European settlers brought the death penalty to the American societies, where witchcraft, rape, perjury, and other capital crimes existed. Nowadays, Death penalty continues

A Paper Against the Death Penalty

1183 words - 5 pages with Sakulanda's statement; death penalty is a cold-blooded treatment for humans. Death is absolutely not the correct means of penalty for a guilty criminal offense.Moreover, I believe in my Catholic religion that God is the only person who has the right to take a person's life away, "Posterity will remember this merciful gesture. As Christians, we believe that God is the giver of life and only God can take it away." (Africa News Service

The Death Penalty and Its Necessity

981 words - 4 pages A devastated, victimized family mourns the loss of Dawn Garvin, a young woman who had recently been murdered for an unknown cause. Many families across the nation face this pain and regret in their lives everyday as they must live through the deaths of their loved ones. What should we do to prevent these tragic events from happening? As many people would say, "The death penalty should be enforced to keep the criminals off the streets." Also

A brief history of the death penalty in the US and the current trends.

2577 words - 10 pages . This shows that the death penalty is not working and its purpose is no longer valid and can very well be an inhuman and cruel punishment. In a 1993 poll, 44% of Americans preferred life without parole that included restitution rather than the death penalty. Less Americans, only 41% preferred the death penalty and 15% were not decided. Given alternatives to the death penalty, more Americans will choose the alternative.During the early eighteenth

No Death Penalty for Juveniles

2288 words - 9 pages its application in many states does. The court notes capital punishment was likely to be imposed in a discriminatory way and that blacks were far more likely to be executed than whites. The decision essentially ends the practice of executions. 1976, Gregg v. Georgia. A Georgia death penalty statute is held constitutional, a ruling that sets the stage for resumption of executions. 1987, McCleskey v. Georgia. Justices rule state death penalty

Similar Essays

The Death Penalty And Juveniles. Essay

796 words - 3 pages bright.On the contrary, juveniles are and should be sentenced the death penalty. The execution of juveniles is legal and practiced in the majority of states that administer the death penalty, the 38 of them. The minimum age for the death penalty in the United States is 16, set by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Thompson v Oklahoma. Currently 24 states allow the death penalty to be given to juveniles (Execution of Child Offenders). So of the 38 states

Discuss And Evaluate The Arguments For And Against The Use Of The Death Penalty.

3024 words - 12 pages Discuss and evaluate the arguments for and against the use of the death penalty.Capital punishment is "the infliction of death as punishment for certain crimes" (dictionary online). In the Bible itself it prescribes death for crimes such as murder, kidnapping, witchcraft and many more. By 1500, in England, only foremost felonies conceded the death penalty - murder, larceny, burglary, rape, arson and treason. However, from 1723 under the "Waltham

Arguments For And Against The Reintroduction Of The Death Penalty For Murder

1924 words - 8 pages 3,058 people were sentenced to death in 65 different countries. ( 2001.) This essay will discuss arguments for and against the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder. One of the most straight forward arguments for the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder, is that once an offender has been executed they are obviously unable to kill again. (Hudson 1996.) A

This Essay Discusses The Two Opposing Viewpoints Of Death Penalty With Its Pros And Cons. It Also Gives Some Facts About People Dieing From The Death Penalty.

575 words - 2 pages consideration. (Associated Press, March 6, 2003).Execution of Texas Man Slated for March 12 Despite Questions of InnocenceTexas is scheduled to execute Delma Banks on March 12 despite the questions of innocence that have been raised in his case. Attorneys for Banks assert that, in addition to evidence of racial bias in this case and the failure of Banks' trial attorney to provide an adequate defense, the underlying case against their client depends upon