Thomas Hobbes And The Social Contract

1634 words - 7 pages

Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to connect the philosophical commitments to politics. He offers a distinctive definition to what man needs in life which is a successful means to a conclusion. He eloquently defines the social contract of man after defining the intentions of man. This paper will account for why Hobbes felt that man was inherently empowered to preserve life through all means necessary, and how he creates an authorization for an absolute sovereign authority to help keep peace and preserve life. Hobbes first defines the nature of man. Inherently man is evil. He will do whatever is morally permissible to self preservation. This definition helps us understand the argument of why Hobbes was pessimistic of man, and called for a social contract theory. This is the only way to keep peace and preserve life. These points will lead to why Hobbes called for the citizen to give consent to absolute rule.
Prior to issuing the social contract, Hobbes in Leviathan has to define the state of man. In Chapter 8 of Natural Condition of Mankind, as concerning their felicity and misery Hobbes notes the individualism of man. He states how man has no obligation to other people, and that they are the center of the universe. He defines how man’s inalienable right is for self preservation. He detours from traditional logic and reasoning stating that man is emboldened to need god to attain his end means. This is a secular theory that has never been presented before. The fact is that man lives by only one rule: to preserve the right to preserve. Man lives to kill or be killed. Every man acts as a singular body that has the duty to preserve his own successful end means. Freedom is an obligation to preserve and defend your own life even if it calls for the end of others. His new theory takes the role of god being a divine authority that man should obey, and concludes that man has only one rule to obey. That is the preservation of man’s own success. He states, “by force or wiles to master the persons of all men he can, so long till he see no other power great enough to endanger him. And this is no more than man’s(sic) own conservation requireth, and is generally allowed” (Hobbes, 1994, page 75).
Hobbes states that with this singular rule to abide leads to three characteristics of outcome. That man first looks to invade and conquer through competition. He will look to go to war with anyone that gets in the way of a successful end. “Man is enemy to every man..(therefore) men live without other security” (Hobbes, 1994, page 76). The need to define man as a savage individual leads Hobbes to the Laws of Nature, and will help define the need authorizing an absolute sovereignty.
Why is this information important? By defining the intent of man, Hobbes is setting up the need for absolute sovereignty to create a conducive community where man can live with others. If he can establish that man is inherently seeking only for himself,...

Find Another Essay On Thomas Hobbes and the Social Contract

In this discussion we will look at the meaning and nature of the social contract as seen from the point of view of political theorists, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.

2024 words - 8 pages How did people ever get together, and probably be still long enough, to form government? Were their rights negotiated or given? In this discussion we will look at the meaning and nature of the social contract as seen from the point of view of political theorists, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.General Social ContractAccording to Roland (1994): "The fundamental basis for government and law in this system is the concept of the social contract

It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in regards to social contract, the state of nature and each of their ideal governments.

1843 words - 7 pages up their rights, they are subjecting themselves to inequality. Rousseau says if people don't give up their rights, then they can never leave the state of nature.Thomas Hobbes originated the concept of the social contract. Hobbes believed that all the phenomena in the universe, including political institutions, could be understood using principles of geometry. In Leviathan, Hobbes argued that all humans are driven by two impulses: fear of death and

Comparing Thomas Hobbes and Augustine

819 words - 3 pages control. Hobbes, on the other hand, believes that war is a natural condition of mankind. Although Hobbes and Augustine seem to both believe that there needs to be one source of law (Augustine, God and Hobbes, Social Contracts), Hobbes takes off to suggest that we are motivated by selfish self interests and because of that, we are better off living in a world of moral rules. Without there rules we are at the mercy of other people's self - interest

The philosophy of thomas hobbes

1199 words - 5 pages . If one does not go out in the world and fight for what one wants and needs then one is surely going to be put in the back of the pack, looking for whatever scraps are left, not gaining anything one wants. But to Hobbes there is a way to get out of this violent state of nature, one in which sacrifices must be made in order for the society to last as a whole.Hobbes' social contract explains what Hobbes believes must happen before man can live in a

Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes: The Science of Man

1390 words - 6 pages In this paper I intend to examine the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes, in particular their ideas relating to the science of man, and attempt to explain why their ideas prove that it is not possible to construct a science of man. I will also briefly mention the philosophy of Donald Davidson in regards to a science of man. The theories of Hobbes and the contemporary socio- biologists attempt to

Natural Law, Rationality and the Social Contract

2079 words - 8 pages commonwealth is usually performed without explicit deliberation, there is a common consensus amongst philosophers that something unique to the human experience is the driving force behind this decision. Contained within this something are highly contested points of debate amongst both past and contemporary political philosophers. Two such philosophers are Thomas Hobbes and Thomas Aquinas. Each of these political writers provide detailed arguments

The Social Contract

913 words - 4 pages Social Contract" in 1762. In 1770 he completed his "Confessions" and lived mostly in France until his death in 1778.Rousseau's sole purpose or thought in writing "The Social Contract", was to consider if, in political society, there can be any legitimate and sure principal of government, taking men as they are and laws as they might be. (Rousseau) His argument is his belief that once men have entered into society; freedom comes to be inseparable


1108 words - 4 pages , the freedom that he experiences in the State of Nature?"How to find a form of association which will defend the person and goods of each member with the collective force of all, and under which each individual, while uniting himself with the others, obeys no one but himself, and remains as free as before." This is the fundamental problem to which the social contract holds the solution. (361)Rousseau believed that if each individual joined in

Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

2212 words - 9 pages Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau have very different views on the social contract largely based on their fundamental views of the state of nature in humanity. These basic views of natural human nature cause Hobbes and Rousseau to have views on opposite sides of the spectrum, based on two controversial speculations, that human is inherently good or that human is inherently inclined towards egotism and perpetual insecurity. Due to his

Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

2132 words - 9 pages many new governments. These theorists all recognize that people develop a social contract within their society, but have differing views on what exactly the social contract is and how it is established. By way of the differing versions of the social contract Hobbes and Rousseau agreed that certain freedoms had been surrendered for a society’s protection and emphasizing the government’s definite responsibilities to its citizens.      Each

Thomas Hobbes Biography And View On Justice

1420 words - 6 pages Thomas Hobbes Introduction Thomas Hobbes sees human from a mechanistic view that life is simply the motions of the organism believes that a state of nature in human kind will eventually become a state of war of all against all. He attempted to justify the absolute power of the sovereign on the basis of a hypothetical social contract in which individuals seek to protect themselves from one another by agreeing to obey the sovereign in all

Similar Essays

Thomas Hobbes' Social Contract Theory Essay

1039 words - 4 pages to suppress our fear, by creating order, to have more order; we must have security, so the social contract appeared. Thomas Hobbes implies to the idea of social contract to resolve the problem of war and disorder. If social contract were not created, there would be no law. If there’s no law, the citizens would do as they please. If that’s the case, the citizens will disregard traffic sign, traffic light, restriction sign and etc. I agreed with

Differences Between The Social Contract Theory Of John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

2347 words - 9 pages will, etc. are interchangeable terms. Rousseauǯs theory inspired French and American revolutions and given impetus to nationalism. He based his theory of social contract on the principle of DzMan is born free, but everywhere he is in chainsdz. COMPARISION OF THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CONTRACT OF THOMAS HOBBES, JOHN LOCKE AND JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU 1. Hobbes asserts that without subjection to a common power of their rights and freedoms

Force, Morality And Rights In Thomas Hobbes And John Locke's Social Contract Theories

1635 words - 7 pages Force, Morality and Rights in Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's Social Contract Theories Throughout history, the effects of the unequal distribution of power and justice within societies have become apparent through the failure of governments, resulting in the creation of theories regarding ways to balance the amount of power given and the way in which justice is enforced. Due to this need for change, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke created two

Social Contract Theorists: Hobbes Vs. Rousseau This Paper Compares And Contrasts Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau And Then I Discuss Who I Think Has The Stronger Position And Why.

1754 words - 7 pages Thomas Hobbes believes that all people are naturally evil, hostile, and self-seeking whereas Jean Jacques Rousseau claims that all people are naturally good people and generally happy. I plan to prove that Rousseau has the stronger position of the two contract theorists.Thomas Hobbes claims all people are hostile and naturally self-seeking. Hobbes's claims when two people have a desire for the same resource the natural result is war. The state