Thomas Hobbes Vs. John Locke: Who Is The True Liberal?

1685 words - 7 pages

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are often referred to as the premier liberal philosophers, a label which is actually misleading. The political philosophies of Hobbes and Locke are only similar in their methodology, not in their conclusions or in the form of government they advocate. In fact, the ideologies of Hobbes and Locke are so dissimilar they should not even be counted in the same category. Hobbes and Locke both begin with a theoretical "state of nature," which they use to explain how and why governments are formed and what purpose they should serve. This leads many people to place them in the same category of thought, even though the basic structure of their respective states of nature are very different from one another, and the conclusions they draw from these theoretical states are wholly different. Liberals are characterized by their belief that humans are rational, self-interested beings, and by their desire for a new form of government in which all people are free to pursue their own individual interests. John Locke should be considered the real liberal, because he is the only one of these two writers to truly believe in the rationality of all men, and he is the only one to advocate upholding individual freedoms above all else.A major tenet of liberal philosophy is the belief that men are inherently rational. Thomas Hobbes claims to believe that men are rational beings, yet his writing on the subject is so full of contradictions that it is difficult to discern what he actually believes. In Hobbes' state of nature, men are in a constant state of war. He describes this state in The Leviathan as a state of "continual fear, and danger of a violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. (Ball 2002, 68)" Hobbes' writing implies that men are actually irrational, incapable of living together in peace without a sovereign man (or body of men) watching over them, ensuring that they do not harm each other too much. Hobbes portrays men as brutal, instinctual beings who would indeed require a benevolent monarch to curb their passions and restrain them from destroying each other. Hobbes' men are irrational, animalistic beings, who resort to constant warfare when not under the rule of some great man.Hobbes' view is very different from Locke's version of the state of nature, in which men are portrayed as the rational beings both Hobbes and Locke claim they are. In Locke's state of nature, men are free to do as they choose and to exercise their own judgment of what is right and wrong, moral and immoral. Each man has the right and obligation to enforce the law of nature as he sees fit; each man is judge, jury and executioner of this law (Fuller et al. 2000, 28). In Locke's view, this state of nature is a state of perfect freedom, rather than a state of perpetual war. This view promotes the idea of men as rational beings, by showing that men can live pleasant and peaceful lives even without the watchful eye of a sovereign...

Find Another Essay On Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke: Who is the true liberal?

Comparison of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Human Nature

1546 words - 6 pages nature freely shares itself with others: “Every one, as he is bound to preserve himself . . . ought he, to preserve the rest of mankind” (Locke 8). As much as one wishes to fulfill his own needs, he also naturally seeks to serve others, thus eliminating competition. Locke’s state of human nature thrives on equality, weaving harmony, while Hobbes sees humanity’s debauchery ignite war. For Hobbes the violence of the English Civil War and the

A Futuristic interview with Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

2533 words - 10 pages Creative Essay PaperGentian ArtaksiThe following is a transcript of a televised debate betweenThomas Hobbes and John Locke, as seen on November 24, 2093, viaTime~Warp Broadcasting Inc.COM: Television commentatorMED: Mediator of the debateHOB: Thomas HobbesLOC: John LockeDebate # 3Hobbes vs LockeNovember 24, 2093COM: Good evening and welcome to the third debate of our sevendebate series featuring some of the most prominent theorists of alltime

Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx

772 words - 3 pages society, Karl Marx, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes had three different ways to reach to the same destination. Karl Marx claimed that "History is economics in action". John Locke's political theory advocates for common people can protest against an unjust ruler. Thomas Hobbes's "Leviathan" illustrates administration of natural and civil laws, as it powers many individuals who make themselves its people. "The philosophers have only interpreted the world

differences between the social contract theory of john locke and thomas hobbes

2347 words - 9 pages will, etc. are interchangeable terms. Rousseauǯs theory inspired French and American revolutions and given impetus to nationalism. He based his theory of social contract on the principle of DzMan is born free, but everywhere he is in chainsdz. COMPARISION OF THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CONTRACT OF THOMAS HOBBES, JOHN LOCKE AND JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU 1. Hobbes asserts that without subjection to a common power of their rights and freedoms

In this discussion we will look at the meaning and nature of the social contract as seen from the point of view of political theorists, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.

2024 words - 8 pages standards, he was the first of a long line of ideologists and political theorists to emphasize the importance of the individual and make them the center of politics. He believed that government springs from human beings -individuals, and not from some divine sense of purpose or a birthright.If Hobbes can be thought of as the first liberal thinker, than it is only fitting that we consider John Locke, the father of liberal democratic thought

Social contract theorists: Hobbes vs. Rousseau This paper compares and contrasts Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and then I discuss who I think has the stronger position and why.

1754 words - 7 pages Thomas Hobbes believes that all people are naturally evil, hostile, and self-seeking whereas Jean Jacques Rousseau claims that all people are naturally good people and generally happy. I plan to prove that Rousseau has the stronger position of the two contract theorists.Thomas Hobbes claims all people are hostile and naturally self-seeking. Hobbes's claims when two people have a desire for the same resource the natural result is war. The state

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan and John Locke's Second Treatise of Government

2995 words - 12 pages state of cease fire, “for those that are so remissely governed, that they dare take up Armes, to defend or introduce an Opinion, are still in Warrre; and their condition not Peace, but only a Cessation of Armes for feare of one another, and they live as it were, in the procincts of battaile continually.” For Locke, the opposite is true: people who are ill treated under an absolute arbitrary power will be ready to revolt easily, whereas mistakes

Force, Morality and Rights in Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's Social Contract Theories

1635 words - 7 pages Force, Morality and Rights in Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's Social Contract Theories Throughout history, the effects of the unequal distribution of power and justice within societies have become apparent through the failure of governments, resulting in the creation of theories regarding ways to balance the amount of power given and the way in which justice is enforced. Due to this need for change, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke created two

The Ideas of Hobbes VS Locke

964 words - 4 pages Hobbes Vs. LockeNick CappyThomas Hobbes and John Locke were English philosophers who attended Oxford University. Hobbes was born in Westport, England and Locke was born in Wrington. These two philosophers became famous because of their ideas about politics and the understanding of human nature. Thomas Hobbes had a very negative view on human nature. He describes human nature as being constantly at war with one another. According to Hobbes

Literature of Protest. Speaks of authors who became spokesmen for their particular protest movements. Thomas Paine, Thomas Nast, John C. Calhoun, and Martin Luther King

2818 words - 11 pages Thomas Nast. When one mentions protest literature, Nast is not a name that many people would refer to, mainly because much of the general public thinks of him as 'only' a political cartoonist. However, political cartoonists can be considered authors of protest literature; after all, they oftentimes can point out problems with one illustration much more efficiently than a journalist who writes a lengthy story. Also, political cartoons often invoke

The Enlightenment: Hobbes versus Locke

920 words - 4 pages secular, and secondly a constitutional monarch. None of the philosophes were advocates of democracy.By contrast, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) was considered a Machiavellian, he wrote Leviathan and with it depicted the transition from medieval to modern thinking. He and Locke had many opposing views, although both of their theories on government and society were revolutionary. Hobbes' premise of the "State of Nature" was that man is not by nature a

Similar Essays

John Locke Vs Thomas Hobbes Essay

688 words - 3 pages peace, security, and protection from one another. John Locke embraced many of the ideas presented by Hobbes in his theories on the state of nature and the rise of government. They differed however, in that Locke believed that God was the prime factor in politics. He believed that individuals were born with certain rights given not by government or society, but by God. This he said, is what gives all people equality. Locke said in the state of

John Locke Versus Thomas Hobbes Essay

1303 words - 5 pages Change is in the inevitable byproduct of society. As societies evolve they change according to the life style of the people who inhabit them. Without change, society would never progress and thus would be frozen in a single moment in time. Thomas Hobbes and John Lock were two English philosophers who observed tremendous changes in English politics between the years of 1640 and 1690. In closely examining the views of both of these philosophers in

Comparing John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

1232 words - 5 pages Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two political philosophers who are famous for their theories about the formation of the society and discussing man in his natural state. Their theories are both psychologically insightful, but in nature, they are drastically different. Although they lived in the same timeframe, their ideas were derived from different events happening during this time. Hobbes drew his ideas on man from observation, during a

Hobbes Vs. Locke Who Was Correct? Essay

1088 words - 4 pages John Locke believes that man is good; Thomas Hobbes believes that man is evil. One can look at man in these two ways. In Locke's view, man's intentions are benevolent by nature and can live without a central government telling them what exactly to do. Hobbes, the antagonist, believes the complete opposite--that man is brutal by nature and cannot live without a central government running everyone's life. In today's society, Hobbes's philosophy on